Member Info for Allguessing

The post does look genuine. Think he’s warming us up for a raise of some description though. We will see. Either way was a good gesture.

Based on previous this could easily be £1 or 10p again.

I wonder how many chased the price and now in at high 30’s.

What an odd share this is.

Why is it when anyone posts anything factual on here they are accused of lying but when the goons ‘can feel an RNS in their water’ they are hero’s. Some predict increases and an RNS every day, sometimes several times a day and when it doesn’t happen have no shame and do the same thing the next day, and the day after and so on.

Crude is trying to help but just because it’s not what we want to hear he is just insulted. I know the feeling though as I emailed NICE and copied my reply but some questioned this. No helping some people.

I’ve been in further contact with NICE and they give really good info but be blowed if I’m putting it on here again.

You may call us stooges Bruno but have no idea what we have, the average or even if we bought at 8p! One things for sure is we were not calling 50/60/70p last week.

If facts make us stooges then stooges we are.

If being a bully makes you clever then you are a genius.

I wonder how much the Saudi trip cost! More cash being spent. They will no doubt say ‘we have some good leads’.

They have more leads than you will see at Crufts but none turn into sales.

I reckon the only Saudi connection any of us have on here is with Sheik-Ma-Chamois the Saudi window cleaner who works up the road

Nice one Daffy :)

I tend to think multi- millionaires don’t have this amount of time to idle away time on a free bulletin board! Like me most on here put money in and dream of it going up the next day or sooner and getting money for nothing. It barely ever works.

I know I am the most miserable poster on here but can’t get past £4.7m out and £50,000 in with pretty much zero sales.

This could come good but with no sales I don’t see an appetite for a buy out until there are proven sales.

They have said in no uncertain terms they are running out of cash. That’s not me being my usual miserable self it’s fact they actually said it.

People are getting excited by them going to a the Middle East. They will be having a great time with great food, great accommodation and the drinks will be flowing. Who doesn’t like a work jolly. Who’s funding it?

Twitter often gets a mention when they like a post (FFS). Their followers have reduced. Liking posts bring in zero revenue.

The NICE recommendation will give this a boast but that won’t bring money in. Only sales will.

It is doing better and let’s hope my misery soon turns to joy.

Fair enough Grim you are right and the person from NICE must be wrong.

Grim I literally copied and pasted the reply.

Baserite you are just a bit of a fantasist. Anyone says anything factual that doesn’t suit your beliefs and you abuse them. You are a bully really. All I was pointing out was the facts from NICE. If you took the time to gather facts rather than ramp ramp ramp you may find you do much better. Now off you toddle to argue with NICE as you clearly know better. Actually clearly know everything about everything.

I agree Lloyd although the NHS waste billions and could manage finances much better. Let’s hope it works out but was an interesting reply from NICE.

Yes I do as I took the time to write to NICE and was surprised they did but they replied. There so much nonsense on here I thought I would find out for sure. He you go:-

The types of recommendations the committee can make are:

Conditionally recommended for use while further evidence is generated.
Made when the committee or panel consider it is plausible that the technology will address the unmet need and it is acceptable for the technology to be used in practice (potentially with measures in place to mitigate risks) while further evidence is generated. How evidence is to be collected (for example, collected while the technology is used in practice or from a research study) will be determined in the evidence generation plan developed.

Recommended in research
Made when the committee or panel are uncertain if the technology has the potential to solve the unmet need, or if the committee do not think it is acceptable for the technology to be widely used in practice while further evidence is generated. For example, if it is too uncertain about the extent to which the potential benefits of use outweigh the potential risks.

Not recommended for use
Made where the committee or panel do not believe a technology has the potential to meet the unmet need, or where there are concerns about the potential harms associated with using the technology even in a research context.

There's no legal requirement to follow the recommendations we make on this type of technology, but it's considered best clinical practice for the NHS to do so. This does mean that even if we've issued guidance recommending a diagnostic procedure, the NHS is not obliged to provide it. Therefore, at this time, it would be difficult to say whether the NHS would have to install the technology for use of patients as it would depend on the type of recommendation and whether individual commissioners decide whether to adopt it.

This is doing better but even if NICE recommend AIHD use the NHS do not have to implement it unless the benefits outweigh the benefits of spending their money elsewhere.

GDR need sales.

It would not surprise me one little bit if some on here, even regular poster hold zero shares. Mark my words some have zero holding.

Been a little better lately but the raise still concerns me.

The NICE news will help but let’s remember they need to sell things to stay afloat (even post raise)

It’s almost as if the £4.7m out and £50k in has been forgotten.

I must admit Roger I am not over surprised. Given where the NHS are now I’m not convinced AIHL will rescue this.

GDR continue to spend at the same rate yet sell nothing.

This really is AIHL or bust (or get taken over for pittance). That raise is coming and to have any chance of corporates taking a punt it will have to be an absolute steal of a price.

I know I will get abuse as not wearing the BB rose-tinted glasses but so be it.

Does anyone know (totally certain) if NICE can insist the NHS use technology they recommend or if it just a best practice recommendation which leaves the ball in the NHS court please?