RE: Washington Post11 Oct 2020 23:20
I'm afraid we don't share the same definition of sadness and insecurity, Dadsbatty.
What I find really sad and insecure is the fact that there are individuals who, out of thorough delusion and bitterness regarding their investment, will readily smear other companies. Even worse, they rarely own up to their lies. They're just too far gone for that.
Thus you, and all the people who upvoted you (unless you upvoted yourself), are extremely sad an insecure in my book.
Anyway, as promised, Im coming back to assess the bold claim that Novacyt would be incapable of releasing in time the products it had announced.
Let's remind ourselves what grimshady said last August :
*********************
grimshady - 23 Aug '20
"NCYT are having to redesign there (sic) test because it is ****......... they have months of RND then months of trials and approvals ahead of them."
grimshady - 23 Aug '20
"They have a huge job to reinvent there test to look at 2nd gene to be more accurate ect. then they have approvals to get through and trials ect"
grimshady - 24 Aug '20
"Fact clinical trials will be much more stringent than before purely and simply because there are other alternatives now."
*********************
And now for a dose of reality :
- 2-gene test : CE-marked, launched on time.
- Antibody test : CE-marked, launched on time.
- Multiplex panel : CE-marked, launched even before the expected date.
I'm not even mentionning the current share price since it's beside the point of this exercice.
Will grimshady have the decency to apologise for this gratuitous slander of Novacyt ?