Member Info for All_at_sea

I'm ahead of you. I have emailed asking for a statement explaining their holding position - as delusional as such an enquiry will be perceived! Albeit not as knowledgeable as some of you on the legal aspects of these holding positions, my basic understanding of the conversations on this board is that ARCM are clearly in breach of FCA rules? I'm therefore astounded that there hasn't been any statement from PMO or indication of FCA investigation into the holding? This said I'm probably being naive.

Thanks. I had noted over the past year or so the growing resentment (putting it mildly) for GS. I agree with many of you, how it's not illegal is staggering. It must severely constrain investment in PMO likewise PMO's ability to borrow - not that it seams we would want to encourage TD to borrow based on some comments :-)

You're more on the edge of your seat than laidback! :-) A lot like me. I'm more concerned that much of the value has been factored into the share price :-( Some of our more informed colleagues on this board suggest this is the case... I would like to know how robust such a claim can be - albeit many appear to have a rough idea of Zama's estimated value - therefore predicted affect on the share. Any suggestions on scale of bounce or not?

Here's hoping for a big Christmas party at TR6's! :-)

Neither of you need worry.. under Corbyn's hard left socialist regime PMO will be nationalised and all our investments go down the pan... LoL ;-)

mmm... I don't know, is it mis-selling or simply where customer service is these days.... It's like the 12 inches being talked about... should it be nearer a yard... or has the leak been counter-productive?

I thought that was the toast!.