Member Info for All_at_sea

If only!!! As a PMO times holder I need it to double from here :-(

Absolutely LEGENDS Where do they think they will get the base load from!

Will Starmageddon have any effect on Harbour, e.g. GB Energy and the tax demand it will create and his aim to essentially shut down North Sea production?

Is it all hot air or with a super majority will the insanity be pushed through? His tax payer created multi-millionaire donor Dale Vince will be looking for more contracts for windmills :-) The irony is offshore has yet to connected to mainland at a cost of £59bn before you even try and store it! That cost is apparently two Hinckley Point C powerstations according to EoN. Cost effectiveness and energy security plain to see.

Anyway I'm guessing the reply is, Harbour's current price reflects the impact of Starmageddon.

This all sounds fantastic.. which as many often question, so why are we still at 15p in old money. Like Rookie is to some extent, I'm trapped by the rapid devaluation post ARCM fraud and subsequent share consolidation prior to merger and stand to lose a fortune were I to sell at current prices. Unfortunately health implications stopped me bailing earlier, these are still an issue for me. I can now only hope we will see this "dog", as many call it, rise to a more respectable price reflective of your "reasons to be cheerful". I somehow fear we could be waiting some time...

Good luck all those holding!

Jeff.
If you've not watched it take a look at Michael Moore's documentary Planet of the Humans... it answers some of the questions.. depending where your opinions lay with him. Sadly it had to be edited slightly after pressure from Elon Musk before YouTube would allow it to be hosted.. hmm says it all really.

LOL!... If they mentioned Total it would be my guess they are repeating the news from yesterday that Total have pulled out of new UK investments blaming WFT.

Return of the Boris? Many believe he's the only one who can lead them into the next election.. which may come sooner than we think.

Kia Sportage has already previously stated he wouldn't support new fossil fuel exploration favouring signing up to an economically unviable and unsustainable significant ramp up of wind! Who on earth convinced him that's a good idea! Sadly theh are likely to get in soon, if GE called, or in two years... i doubt even a Boris return could save the Tories.

TC. .. I share your sentiment. Do you see a possible Boris comeback sooner than later potentially buoying the market as some predict? I fear Liz doesn't have long.

To my surprise I agree with you on this Rookie. Strike isn't far off the mark. Who and what can anyone do to change this single minded focus on a direction which is more about control than sustainability. Talking to colleagues across academia focussed on this area of geopolitics there is growing scientific evidence this direction has no sustainable benefits long term, both environmental and economic. If it were such a beneficial direction Government's wouldn't need to legislate adoption.
There's plenty of peer reviewed research now published.

Potty time, you're beginning to sound like our great absent friend Sauerkraut.. lol entertaining amongst the madness around us though!
Talking of which I get the frustration..how can the media world be talking of planned 3 hour national power cuts with so much gas available.. why not use UK gas which could easily meet UK demand and as I understand some of Europe's? If I'm to be as cynical as Rookie is this a deliberate political play to blame and remove the Tories create a new landscape and invest further in that crazy wind vision recently passed to Kia Sportage.. sorry Starmer to sell to the misguided masses.
There must be a straightforward reason for lack of support for uk gas and oil at this time - is it simply cost?
Anyway back to my sick bed! I'll wait for someone informed to explain..lol
All at sea.

Cheers Clued, interesting insight. I fear the problem with taxing UK income of Oilers is it will only ever be a political gesture - squeeze too much and companies will surely simply realign structure to reduce exposure . If the Government wish to maintain support it will require wider taxation unless the consumer costs are reduced?

The problem being WT will only raise circa £10bn and Truss is talking about borrowing at £100bn to cover a two year freeze. The repayment period being 20years. Thornbury has just indicated Labour would pursue the whole requirement from WTs. Surely any ongoing WT strategy will simply force profits offshore? Which party will admit taxes will need to rise to repay the borrowing?

I don't know what people expect politicians to do - if the tax payer has to bail out those who need help (the inevitable) we will end up in a vicious cycle of taxation to support energy prices. These prices are here to stay I don't see what legal levers the Government has to reduce them whichever supply route. This country has foolishly believed in the Wind and Solar dream, these are only tertiary at best, we've therefore needed gas to constantly bridge the shortfall in energy, instead like energy resilient France we should have invested in Nuclear. Not wishing to sound too much like Rookie, at a geo-political level it plays into the hands of the WEF 'a (Klaus Schwab) control vision so I don't see these global industry players being overly engaging in any resolution detrimental to them.

Those Green clowns aren't even comparing like for like. Wind is a tertiary (top up) power source, not even secondary such as a tidal system. All they currently have as a fair comparison is nuclear (if you accept it's green) versus gas.. lol

https://www.harbourenergy.com/investors/shareholder-information/dividends/

That will undoubtedly be at the AGM then.
https://www.harbourenergy.com/investors/shareholder-information/annual-general-meetings/

To answer in part, I found this
https://www.harbourenergy.com/investors/shareholder-information/dividends/

I agree with you SK!

It's certainly got the tinfoilers excited and their imaginations running wild...lol. !!

Absolutely! 18p of it in old money! :-))