Member Info for alfista

Hopefully this is the last week that anonymous bloggers, and their lickers, will try to profit from lack of information. The stated intention to improve investor communications, and dispel the foul allegations will, hopefully, disinfect these chat boards in future.

I'd have thought it demonstrates a thought process, where answers in one trial lead to a further trial, developing the health benefit claims. If the first ones weren't successful then the more recent ones would never have been launched IMHO

Not enjoying this phase, surely has to be funding related. About time we saw a resolution to this need. Of course, if it was linked to some solid progress in commercialisation, that would be perfect.

An observer would certainly be justified in believing that information not in the public domain was being made available to you, you infer as much.

Just saying

Sorry typos

What is it that we are sick of?

If there was price sensitive news to report, then, by law, we would have it.

Blaming the (non) messenger is futile IMHO

I guess there has been no boom in sales, and hope that there hasn't been a dip. Glad to see it back in stock on the other sales channels, glad to see a trcickle of other products maunching, especially as they are getting their supplies direct from {Provexis. Funding is a continued worry, and, I believe, a major driver of the revnt poor performance. When By Health will open up a major selling campaign id their choice, really very little that IF can do about that. He keeps getting the blame for being a bad salesman, when he has never been a salesman at all.

Just blowing off steam, it is frustrating seeing the sp suffer.....

A fatuous argument, and you know it.

This is a market, and if forces have deep enough pockets they can short indefinitely, until positive buyers overwhelm them

Fact

Yes of course, companies that have a global image of being top experts, can not be relied on to produce accurate data.

And your response, as it always is, is to attack the poster, because you can't attack plain facts.

I haven't read any post doing any exhorting. If you are claiming that Schlummy's are telling untruths, you'd better watch your back IMO. Those that have posted using data prepared by them and Baker Hughs are not in any way telling others what to do. Whereas rhetoric like "death spiral" ought to be actionable by instant banning unless absolute proof can be provided. the FACT that recent fundraising was massively oversubscribed makes such claims look the lies that they are, Shorters talking their book should have some level of legal responsibility in my view.

Another fact. You, and the other liars, ONLY appear when shorting activity is being executed.

You pick fights with those who post verifiable positive issues, and accuse them of making it up. Your statements, often claiming the precise opposite of what has been assessed by world standard industry experts, would only be acceptable (IMHO) if they were back up by oil industry information, but they are not. Instead, you constantly promote an anonymous source, which many believe to be your alter ego.

Pantheon need o get physical progress happening again, and develop further their world class discovery. Then, and only then, will you liars run for cover.

That' below acceptable, you are just lying.

Financing completed, extra acreage secured, plans being spelled out, with full discussion in a month.

All are facts,

How many times are you going to repeat flat out lies?

Which is .50 more than Fruitflow direct from Provexis.

Much more profit would go to Provexis, helping profits, which surely any shareholder wants.

Go figure.

The divi was so high, reflecting the political situation. We all knew that, why do these "mood depresser" types keep on appearing constantly talking things down? Nothing to do with shorters of course.....cough.

That indicates that the approvals are the all important stage doesn't it.

Are we nearly there yet? :-)

Are they not taking the long term flow test of the deeper level to conclusion first?

All good speculation. Back to the dot joining days ehh !

The write up is brilliant, science presented in an understandable way.
Good to see activity in the USA, it should have happened a long time ago, but the new gut biota angle give the opportunity to put it before the industry afresh.

You may well think it, but you're in an evidence free zone.
All trades are transfers, between a buyer and a seller, with the MM's in the middle to create some level of liquidity.
That trade, at that price, could have been wither a buy or a sell, but there ought to be a balancing trade, MM's wouldn't keep one on the books for very long at all.

Usually a placing is notified before the trades hit the market.
But it's a chunky amount, and no way would MM's raise the Bid to accommodate that amount unless they has a sale for the shares