Member Info for Alfacomp

cf - this article is mainly different in that it is referring primarily to liquid stocks unlike the very illiquid ones that we have on AIM - thus the idea of maximising trading volumes is even less applicable in our case. Apart from that it is a very revealing article.

Dav3J - I think you mean 29.25 - the spread is very tight now, usually a sign that something is about to happen.

we now have a database approaching 50 contacts and a few (3) people who would be willing to contact some of these people each time we have a big story to promote.

I am hoping to build a team of 6+ people who would be willing to use email or twitter to contact some of these people - we are not talking every single journalist each time, just a selected group. Who would be willing to help out with this - the first article to bring to people's attention would be the Corbine Cup ( https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/the-corbine-cup ) which we aim to promote this weekend.

As requested

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/trading-analysis-19th-oct-2018

And even happier buyers.

Thanks very much

28.51, then 28.655 now 28.7

indeed a fair question. From BMN/BE's perspective I suspect that it would be better if RedT were 1) independent and 2) successful.

If BE can get a leased electrolyte model working with anyone then they should be just as able to supply redT at arms length. I am not sure that RedT has anything specific that BE would like and I cannot see how BE, based in SA could make RedT any more successful than it currently is or isn't.

RedT's problems may stem from a general expectation of holders of technology stocks that having a patent is the same as having a business. Maybe you can pull that game in the pharma sector, which is wealthy, but short of new ideas, but in very few others.

Uksteveg - if you are referring to the 1M trade yesterday - I believe that there is stronger evidence for this being a Buy than a sell.

Buys than Sells,

Would anyone like a trade analysis later this morning ?

Nick - I think the next 2 weeks could also be fairly mindblowing - I think that we have seen buying strength without the obvious day traders turning up - and that this will cause the market maker that is 5M short some serious difficulty in the next few days.

I believe that this could lead to the surprise surprise dropping of the Atlas warrants and then we may see a straighter market.

4khandles - we experienced the same sharemuppetry on BMN in august 2017 - our response was to rigorously note everything down and carefully rebut all the TW nonsense in a separate standalone blog the Bushveld Perspective which has since grown into a community research hub:

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/blog/public-trade-analysis-6/post/18th-aug-2017-flash-short-context-198

The short on the 18th August and the subsequent trade analysis that I undertook has now also grown into a regular daily service that allows the games that the market makers are playing to be exposed. ( https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/trading-analysis-18th-oct-2018 )

Unfortunately this is the level of detail that you really need to go to to firm up shareholder faith in company fundamentals - in the short term the best approach is to simply ignore the idiot Winnifrith.

James - no if you look at the chart on the trade analysis you will see that the price paid was within the advertising trading band, just. The reported bid and ask are screwed up because they are the ones that were in play when the trade was actually reported not when it was actually made - this is precisely why as part of the trade analysis I need to go back and manually fix all the bid/ask values for delayed trades by inspection of the trades on either side that were reported contemporaneously.

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/trading-analysis-18th-oct-2018

What is concerning from your point of view is that there was a buy at 0.5p cheaper 12 minutes before. In my own case I never buy using limit orders because it gives the brokers entirely the choice of when to put your order through, or not. A naughty broker might be tempted to front run the trade - interposing themselves in between you and the market - they buy from the market cheap and then sell to you at the expensive price you've just told them you're prepared to pay.

Someone who should definitely be complaining is the person who have to pay 29.90p at 16:27 - the trading band was a full 0.6p lower at that point.

swampdub - yes they could, for example it is not impossible that the MM who is short purchased the warrants from Atlas.

https://www.thebushveldperspective.com/trading-analysis-18th-oct-2018

it's a big one today

Sprites and James - thanks for the information very helpful.

James - wow thats an incredible story I've not heard of anything quite as bad as that before. I'm not familiar with Transact as a platform or service but the idea of them telling you that they need to combine your orders with others before processing them seems to offer them a gold plated opportunity to take advantage.

that people would like to have some completed trade analysis for the day

that people would like to have some completed trade analysis for the day

James - that's an interesting time which I am just trying to analyse - you don't know the price you paid do you ?

1210 - I have already been in contact with BBN about putting something together on his recent posts. And yes you are right we would all be in a bit of a pickle if everyone's posts over 3 months old got 'lost' - well maybe not that bad - how often does one go back 3 months to dig out a long forgotten piece of research.

Brilliant approach knuttie saves something like 2/3rds of the spread