RE: Daily Telegraph Article16 Aug 2019 14:08
Zebediah - the transmission lines and all the step-up step-down equipment of course has a maximum rated limited, which has to be bigger than the maximum peak transmission that that part of the grid experiences. As many fossil-fueled systems of transportation and heating become electrified the amount of electrical energy being transmitted around the grid will necessarily increase.
Either you have to increase the transmission capacity of the transmission lines or you arrange it that the peaks of consumption do not produce simultaneous peaks in transmission. The way you do this is to store energy in batteries before you need it. You do this when the grid has excess generation power and when the amount of energy being transmitted around the grid is also lower than the average. You deliver this stored energy when demand is high and the amount of transmission on the grid is also high.
Thus at that point you do not want to be transmitting the energy a long way across the grid as you will only be putting yourself back into the situation of pushing the transmission limits of the lines, ergo you want to locate the energy storage close to centres of demand, not generation.
Above I describe the peak shifting application and not of the backup application that batteries can of course provide, eg should a generator go down unexpectedly. In this scenario you might assert that you want to have battery back up by every generator, acting as a simple drop in replacement. This way of looking at things quite clearly overstates the amount of batteries that you need as you don't need to guarantee that every generator remains supplying in the one in a trillion year scenario that all generators go down simultaneously (if that's the case it is likely that there are bigger issues than keeping the lights on) - a few dotted around will hopefully do for the whole country should 2 or 3 generators fail at the same time.