Member Info for Alan2017

Brooko - this steady rise has all the hallmarks of lasts years rise from 9p to 38p. May it continue and break through the previous high.

A lot of folk including myself have been waiting for the potential of Brockham to be unlocked...never thought it would take this long. Fun times ahead and its another tick in the box for the Weald as a whole. Shame Pboo can't see that through his blinkers.

Brooko - exactly. Why would Pboo be using WE for UKOG and THEY for Angus on WeadOilers....just look at this recent tweet....blatantly obvious lol

https://twitter.com/WealdOilers/status/1054663474255663104

Pboo - every post of yours folk are just saying to themselves....why is Pboo digging a deeper hole for himself...and for what purpose?!?! lol

Once again the Ministry of Disinformation is at it again ...your post "And by the way it was Angus Mr Vonk who said
"Before Christmas" and you know that. I am only repeating what the boss said." Is factually incorrect...Vonk stated in the interview you can read from 7min 20seconds

“In the next couple of weeks, but definitely before Christmas”

http://www.lse.co.uk/media/exclusive-balcombe-test-boost-for-angus-energy-as-oil-flows.html

Just read one of your many wrong Twitter posts...

"Vonk needs to be honest, looks like his 2 weeks is wrong and before Christmas is more like it."

https://twitter.com/WealdOilers/status/1053210157558218754?s=20

Why do you spend so much time on a board when you are not invested in Angus? You know what...with all these nonsensical posts by you...we'll end up with equipment arriving on site tomorrow lol That would make me laugh out loud.

Regarding tankers...you won't need tankers for another 2 years once things wind up at HH within several weeks. I don't think the UKOG board would be happy with you if Angus investors went over there and explained which company is going to multi bag in the coming weeks?

ChasPB - pressure tests would have begun as soon as they shut the well in prior to the equipment leaving the site.

Pboo - whatever are we going to do with you? Your Balcombe start date of Mid October was embarrassingly out by several weeks. And now you’re saying equipment won’t arrive before Christmas at Brockham. So guys that means we’ll see equipment this week as Pboo always gets it wrong lol https://twitter.com/WealdOilers/status/1053210157558218754?s=20

Thats some strong buying already this morning...would be great to get another healthy rise everyday this week and some equipment arriving at Brockham site.

It's been a very long wait, but exciting times ahead.

SuperOwl or Cuckoo?

Now see the mask is slipping lol

SuperOwl - your statement "do you feel you have gone a bit rampy?" is rather amusing.

I have only used figures garnered from actual flow tests achieved from both Balcombe 2018 and HH 2016. These are recognised bopd numbers.

Brockham is 4.97 miles from HH as the crow flies and testing the same zone....so yes it makes sense to compare those results and then to take into account that its perforating 3.9 times what HH did.

Why would you be trying to dispute facts...highly suspicious. And you didn't close your other account...LSE did it for you lol.

I would be interested what would happen if folk reported you for being a previous banned poster....I assume they look at your IP address.

Superowl - maybe its just because its Halloween approaching, but I have a spooky feeling I have spoken to you….before you got banned by LSE for trying to manipulate PIs by constantly throwing in negative comments.

I don’t know why you mentioned me in one of your posts….I assume to legitimise your deramp.

Vonk gave a value for Angus for every 100bopd…..what is wrong with that? Thats not being reckless.

xxxyyyzzz posted this great post:

"From the interview below, Paul Vonk said: "Each 100 bopd at a P/E of 15-25 = £25m-£40m mkt cap." which gives the following potential mkt caps (and with the 65% ownership already factored in to give the corresponding sp with 381m shares in issue):

100 bopd = £25m-£40m mkt cap (4.25p-6.825p for 65% share)
500 bopd = £125m-£200m mkt cap (21p-34p for 65% share)
1000 bopd = £250m-£400m mkt cap (42p-68p for 65% share)
1365 bopd = £341-£546m (57p-93p for 65% share)
2000 bopd = £500m-£800m (84p-136p for 65% share )
3000 bopd = £750m-£1.2 billion (126p-204p for 65% share )
4000 bopd = £1 billion-£1.6 billion (168p-272p for 65% share )
5325 bopd = £1.33 billion - £2.13 billion (224p-362p for 65% share)
(NOTE: Angus own 65% of Brockham)

Angus flow tested 1365 bopd at HH from 168 ft of kimmeridge then sold their stake to drill the thicker Brockham.
Angus are about to PRODUCE (not flow test) 656 ft of kimmeridge at Brockham. Thats 3.9x more,ie 5325 bopd."

TheGriff - look at my historical posts and all is explained.

Cardinal - I have a long memory and remember your negative posts and style of writing. You're only here with I see other disinterested investors in Angus rising SP to try and influence investors to sell.

Keep an eye on the religious one lol

We must be seeing action this week as Cardinal is back lol He's not a fan of Angus.

Share talk- the key point was that they were getting over 3,000bopd at Balcombe and only choked it back because of slugging due to the size of the production tubing and a more powerful pump was required. Exciting times in the near future.

Lovejoy - quote from IMB “Lovejoy is a trickster, a swindling art and antiques dealer who seems to get caught up in devious deals and `get rich quick' schemes.” How very apt lol

Moneymaker - watch this interview with Vonk. Whole interview is good, but fast forward to 5min 20secs for your answer. 200m of fractured interconnected and one single oil column. Exciting times. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWorBy1lpJU&feature=youtu.be

Hertstrader - all the ingredients are there for a very good commercial flow test. Horse Hill is only 4.97miles from Brockham as the crow flies. This visualisation does put it into prospective when comparing HH flow test in 2016 and Brockham https://twitter.com/profit_is_king/status/1053582013247221760 UKOG (actually Angus did it for them) flow tested their deviated well in both the Upper and Lower Kimmeridge back in 2016 Upper Kim perforated 88ft observing 901bopd Lower Kim perforated 80ft observing 464bopd So they perforated 168ft and observed 1,365bopd Angus are perforating 200m or 656ft of Kimmeridge. That is 4 times what UKOG did.

Not sure if this has been posted already...but this visualisation does put it into prospective when comparing HH flow test in 2016 and Brockham

https://twitter.com/profit_is_king/status/1053582013247221760

UKOG (actually Angus did it for them) flow tested their deviated well in both the Upper and Lower Kimmeridge back in 2016

Upper Kim perforated 88ft observing 901bopd
Lower Kim perforated 80ft observing 464bopd

So they perforated 168ft and observed 1,365bopd

Angus are perforating 200m or 656ft of Kimmeridge.
That is 4 times what UKOG did.

WL1516 - let me rewrite that lol

Still need to run the tubing before perforating so no need for a drift run.

I wouldn’t bother conversing with JA51 as he has a great dislike for Angus...just reading his historical posts will highlight this.

WL1516 - Still need to run run the tubing before perforating so need for a drift run. I wouldn’t bother conversing with JA51 as he has a great dislike for Angus...just reading his historical posts will highlight this.

Folks - the coiled tubing was 2” in diameter...not the production tubing which was more likely 2 3/8”