Member Info for AimHigherStill

Nihao, it really isn't, its just 24 pages mainly of information, the parts you need to fill should be done daily quickly by someone competent with the information required easily accessible.

I can't see anything on it that would take months?

Like I said, it depends on how quickly the BoDs want to prepare the paperwork, the only difference is F1 requires a little more, and it isn't much. So if they do that quickly....

Jiffy, since the start of 2025, things have speeded up. Take this example https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/ipos/financial-filings?dealId=1321893-112646

Lots of others this year haven't taken long at all, depends of how quickly the BoDs want it done and get the paperwork sent

At last she's filtered me.

Crying her eyes out because apparently I made her buy at over 2p because I said at 3.5p that 4p was next. Naturally 4p was next after 3.5p but we had a raise to advance Bake.

Shame she didn't listen at 0.5p when I was actually 'telling' everyone to buy shares. Them people are still sitting pretty.

Kat are you actually this stupid?

I'm earning around 50% a year on this investment, show me another bank or anything you can those returns on. My sentiment remains the same, this will be 20p by Xmas, so I have no idea wtf you're on about saying I've done any damage? How have I done any damage you fool?

Anyway isn't it time you sold, cos you know it's Friday? I discuss my investment case here and why I'm invested, I don't care what others do on this board, I really don't. What you mean is you bought over 2p when you had the chance to buy under 0.5p and now you're trying to blame me for something. Get a grip and grow up.

Doesn't Noel Ferrin still own 3%? He hasn't sold and neither will I.

Can someone add up how many times Kat has repeated over and over

'70% shares held by retail'

Jesus christ you're a boring old whining repetitive pointless poster. Just FO.

The HoT contain certain legally binding clauses including:

- TGC will be responsible for, and will provide, necessary transaction expenses of both parties, which are expected to be approximately US$2 million. GST will commit an advance of 20% for the payment of the listing expenses and upon a successful IPO this amount will be reimbursed to GST.

- That TGC shall identify a suitable US-based corporate finance adviser and broker for the purpose of the Potential Listing and send a copy of its proposed engagement letter for GST's review before it is signed.

- The parties agree that the proposed valuation ascribed to 100% of Semnet for the Potential Listing will be US$54 million, of which GST's 67% ownership of Semnet is agreed to be valued at US$36 million subject to the Potential Listing being successfully completed.

Further updates will be announced in due course, as appropriate.

This could be updated at any time.

Integration could be updated at any time.

Easysend could be updated at any time.

Another acquisition could be updated at any time.

This is why investors just sit and wait.

Are we paying him twice to do the same job?

It's certainly not anything negative, it's all extremely positive to me and I can't wait for it to come, just seems strange.

Cods I consider myself to be researched, what have I missed?

To me Bake should be be integrated into GS20 with the management the same, or they integrate them both, come up with a new name possibly which recognises both companies. However the 'GS' is under the 'GSMoney' umbrella so can't see them changing anything, seems strange to me and RNS worthy as to why.

I would have thought a director taking up a new position in a company linked with Gst was Rns worthy?

Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe one will come today.

It seems a little strange to me that he's taken up this position since we are buying Bake and integrating it with GS20, surely bake gets sucked into GS20 and his position remains the same..

Warrie the people's champion.

Heard it all before.

Poor baby, it will be 4p one day, there there.

Kat i said you portray yourself as one, or try to.

Nobody feels sorry for you here, so take your pity elsewhere.

You know cos it's Thursday...

Https://x.com/julianhosp/status/1887402039979684320?s=19

Mike unfortunately Kat portrays herself as an expert trader, truth is she isn't, she's now hurting as she will have to have some patience to break even again, patience, investing eh?

Would have been 4p, but the company raised some extra cash, smart move, will still be 4p but not in 5 minutes like Kat expects when she buys.

It's actually amusing reading her squirmy posts, she'll probably sell at another loss and miss it again anyway.

What has 2.2b billion shares got to do with it?

Strange post, strange bitter woman.

Please take your shares and just leave.

The assets you see dropping is from the defi chain.

Will GST contribute to the technical development of DeFiChain or collaborate on projects like re-pegging DUSD?

GST is not currently focused on contributing to the technical development of DeFiChain or collaborating on initiatives like re-pegging DUSD, but we are open to exploring such opportunities as they emerge, with a positive outlook for potential future collaboration.

Bake no longer supported it and Gst will not either. So this will go down as integration takes place. Hope that clears that up.

This is what you need to focus on...

Why did GST acquire Bake, and how do you plan to integrate Bake into your existing fintech ecosystem?

GST acquired Bake because its platform aligns perfectly with our long-term digital asset strategy and vision for fintech innovation. Bake brings a proven track record in providing accessible and secure crypto services, making it an ideal fit for GST’s broader ecosystem. This acquisition is a win-win, allowing both parties to leverage each other’s strengths for mutual growth.

Bake will serve as the fiat-to-crypto (and vice versa) liquidity layer for GST’s channel partners and the Group as a whole. By integrating Bake into our existing fintech ecosystem, we aim to enhance cross-platform synergies, streamline operations, and deliver even greater value to our users and stakeholders.

Will Bake continue to focus on decentralized finance, or will it move toward a more traditional approach, like Revolut or CEXs?

Bake will continue to prioritize decentralized finance, offering more profitable and innovative DeFi investment opportunities in the near future. This focus ensures that our users can access cutting-edge solutions while benefiting from the core principles of decentralization.

Looking further ahead, we plan to transform Bake’s UX/UI to provide a more intuitive and familiar experience, catering to both retail and corporate users. By combining the flexibility of DeFi with a user-friendly design, we aim to bridge the gap between traditional and decentralized finance, making Bake accessible to a wider audience.

For the clueless, just take your shares so we can pick up some more on the cheap, we thank you for doing, it's a gift from you to us.

If you genuinely believe the gloss has come off and your investment is in 'the lap of the gods'.

Then you should definitely take your money and FO somewhere else. God knows why on earth you'd be holding shares in the laps of the gods.

You have to be seriously stupid to be doing so, do you yourselves a massive favour and close the door behind you. Us who believe know what's coming will not miss the constant crying and whining you all do on here every bloody day.

Seriously, just go and invest in oil or some company who loves a twitter account, you're all like a kindergarten and we are simply sick of you.

If you decide to stay invested and whine all day, then you're a bigger clown than we give you credit for.

Now please just FO and leave is to it. Or grow up, quickly, and see the bigger picture.

Lap of the gods........ sigh