Member Info for aerial

Spread better than 16.33% as the 14m was at a small premium, so more like 12.8%

:)

“The Directors believe that the existing share capital structure is no longer appropriate, as the high number of shares in issue combined with the relatively low price per share is thought to result in excess volatility and reduced liquidity in the Company's shares. By proceeding with the Capital Reorganisation, the Directors anticipate that the Capital Reorganisation should improve the liquidity and the marketability of the Company's shares with institutional investors in the UK and overseas”

Mining is one of the leading sectors in Tanzania, with the value of mineral exports increasing each year. Leading minerals include gold, iron ore, nickel, copper, cobalt, silver, diamond, tanzanite, ruby, garnet, limestone, soda ash, gypsum, salt, phosphate, coal, uranium, gravel, graphite, sand and dimension stones.

Uganda plans to import coal from Tanzania for iron and steel production. Not new news, neither is Edenvilles contracts to export coal to neighbouring countries Burundi and Rwanda new news.

In 2019 China exported coal worth approximately 933.8 million U.S. dollars

Big business coal !!

Spread = 0.006
Margin = 0.38095%

Last b/s

Anti coal era?...

“Australia exported $14 billion coal to China last year”
Currently rolling on BBC News. ...

Coal is deal lol

Currently rolling on BBC News

Coal is deal lol

.....

Kencarv
My opinion of what the bod did has not changed in the slightest. The difference currently is we had news (HappyRobs e-mail) and it answered a question imo. Also this fighting stance with Blis is again imo the company doing what they are paid to do (fighting fraud) and in this case exposing it rather than turning a blind eye. Seems they caught Blis fiddling and consequently are showing some integrity.

My opinion of the underhanded deceitful bolstering RNS and the hugely discounted placing that decimated the SP and that’s where we have sat ever since. All that said my issue has never been with the product, only the bod’s (what I see as) either inexperience or greed!?...

By standing up to Blis could score them a lot of brownie point in my book.

aimhopdyor

:)

LSAI and their legal team must have considered every single word in today’s official statement (“the RNS”). They clearly believe that there is no case against them, and as a consequence have come out punching!

I like their style, let’s hope they have been well advised !!

Hopefully related parties, assuming they read the situation as we
do, might (as you say) come out in our corner. Could Blis swallow,
and make a statement saying it’s all been a big misunderstanding?

Nothing would surprise me!

aimhopdyor

It does!

“location verification company, announces that it has received a letter before action”

I can’t see the 7m here? Had to look at the London Stock Exchange.

Clearly a buy at full ask thought !!

Hopefully somebody has email LSE about the data problem!?...

From the RNS:
“In addition to Blis's communications with Verify customers, where it has retrospectively advised those customers that it changed the data being supplied to Verify, Blis has also admitted to manipulating the data in written communication with the Company, which they have again retrospectively claimed to be to correct "material flaws" in the Verify platform”

Might be in the interest of Blis to snap-up LSAI! as if proven against them it will undoubtedly do Blis a great deal of harm imho

December 2020 | 08:31am
StockMarketWire.com - Location verification company Location Sciences said it would take all necessary action to protect the interests of the company amid potential defamation action against the company from Blis Media.

Blis claimed that the company had made false statements and allegations that had the potential to cause it reputational harm and financial loss.

Earlier this year, Location Sciences' Verify platform flagged data originating from Blis that suggested the latter was manipulating data to enhance its quality scores within the verify platform.

Location Sciences said it had 'significant evidence' to support its position that Blis was manipulating the data by not passing 'true raw data to the verify platform.'