Member Info for addicknt

I don't imagine NM would give an offer at that level any consideration at all.

Excellent. Thanks again, Pad.

Pad, thanks for this. Are you a subscriber? What does the rest of the article say?
Btw, needless to say, I think this bloke Cleary is spot on.

These trades are described as being "non-price forming transactions" and are off-book.
This is the official Stock Exchange description and I'm afraid I don't know what it means...other than the obvious. My guess is that they are merely someone re-arranging the deck chairs.

I'm convinced that whoever is responsible for these trades is permanently pissed and keeps pressing the wrong button.

No one would accuse you of being an investor; patently you are not.

a look at the KitCo web site and specifically the interviews under the BMO conference section. There are some really interesting interviews with various gold company CEOs/commentators. Particularly interesting observations about the current spate of M&A activity as well as overviews of the sector.

400,000 trade keeps popping-up all over the place. Perhaps the bloke can't make-up his mind.

If you want to understand just how difficult it is to get a lithium project up and running, just have a look at BCN.
And bear in mind, that company has been producing battery grade samples for two years, has millions in the bank and a management team that knows what it's doing (sort of).
Even if it gets there, Zulu is years away from producing anything tangible.

I like the new web site and the presentation is excellent.
As ever, the Cautionary Notes are worth a read and I was intrigued by the fact that they refer to the "pre-feasibility and/or Feasibility Study"
The implication, to my fevered imagination, is that we may not see the need for both. This would be excellent news.
I have never understood why the mining industry has to go through two phases, when no other business does the same thing. Why not just get it right first time?
I'm sure some of you will know the technical answer to this, but to my mind, it's a waste of time and money.

It rather depends upon whether it's serious or not.
The last effort was patently useless...a bunch of ambulance-chasing lawyers chancing their arm. If, as was reported, this legal firm has the backing of institutional investors, it may be a different kettle of fish.

you guys seen todays Daily Telegraph business section? Seems another law firm is taking up the cudgels, apparently with the backing of some institutional shareholders.

The one thing, above all else, that upsets me about the intervention from our friendly little helper, is that he didn't spell "vitriol" properly.

Strider, they couldn't afford my fees.

Zoros, I'd have a good think about this guys motives if I were you.

In answer to your question, no, Solg does not have any concessions in protected areas. Sorry to disappoint.

NM is a practical man, so I hope he reaches-out (ghastly phrase) to these gangsters and offers to buy them some shovels so that they can start digging the mine for us. I'm sure they'll enjoy digging several kilometres underground.

Man catches cold near border with Chile.

sorry, meant 'there', not 'their'!

would you put your house on their definitely being a funding announcement in Q1 '19?