Member Info for addicknt

Indeed. I can understand NCM, but BHP? Combined, that's a decisive block of shares which may be available.

Q, I'm very reluctant to mention this and really don't want to get into an argument, but did you pick up on what he said about the share register and it not being a block to a corporate transaction?

Anyone posed any questions for the upcoming presentation? If so, what have you asked? (trying to avoid repetition)

Apology accepted and yes, it was him.

Ag, I'm afraid my ironic statement, which was aimed at the aussie bloke, clearly went over your head. I wouldn't blame you if you didn't read his stuff, but if you wish to comment on exchanges between him and me, I suggest you do so.

"wild claims"; go on, give us a clue, which ones? Do you mean the awards of the mining and exploitation licences?

I'm sure you're right, they're of no significance whatsoever - apart from the minor issue that no one can mine without them. I know, it's a trivial detail and we'd probably be better off without them.

What a fecking plank!

Do you really judge this investment by daily movements in the share price?

I know this hasn't been a good week for you and you've done your best to rain on the parade, but the rest of us are very happy with what amounts to excellent progress.

Ha! Good try. And please, don't feel the need to be 'generous with your time', you wouldn't be missed.

And btw, Tesla, it was your mate Ag who was demanding an apology, not me.

Lest we forget.

Anyone feel the urge to apologize?

Tremendous news. It's been a very long wait.

We're getting much closer to having an 'oven ready' saleable asset.

Brilliant, nal!! I suspect we're all rolling in the aisles at that one! Just one note of caution. You probably used-up a whole months worth of your intellectual capacity in the creation of that masterpiece, so mind how you go for the next 30 days.

This makes me laugh. I've sent three messages in recent weeks to that email address and haven't received a single reply. At least Fawzi answered, even if it was all regurgitated pap.

As to your question, I suspect it's the latter. Caldwell really ballsed-up that last effort and maybe tomorrow is recognition of that.

I wonder if this will be a record low volume?

Aggro, yep. I accurately predicted the December 2020 AGM result would lead to the end of the Mather reign (I did, but this comment is tongue-in-cheek)

The fact is I've tried to avoid making predictions here because they have been frustrated by the previous managements failings. I don't talk about dates for a takeover and nor do I give value predictions. What I do is outline possibilities which invite comments. The one exception is my abiding belief we will not take this to production, and who knows, I may be proved wrong on Thursday - or I may not- or maybe we'll remain in the dark.

Unlike you, and where possible, I avoid definitive statements because it's a mugs game and I've been investing too long to have much certainty about anything. Anyway, keep up the good work.

Oh dear! The poor lad's developed a nasty case of tick envy. And he talks about toddler behaviour without in any way recognising his performance is a bit like the class swot who puts his hand up to every question; " Me sir! Me sir!" and is roundly ignored by the teacher.

For such a young man your memory seems a bit faulty, perhaps a trip to your doctor may be advisable. You appear to have completely, and conveniently, forgotten what you said in your 1981 guise. I haven't, and neither have many others on here.

Anyway, time you got on with some work, us older folk need you to pay your taxes for our pension and zimmer frames.

Sadly, you missed the point - again. I was referring to the bs you came up with when you claimed to be manipulating the market on behalf of a client you were advising. Admittedly, this was whilst you were using your 1981 moniker, so perhaps you prefer to forget about it. And yes, yesterday was highly significant, regardless of the lack of market reaction. Oh, and sorry for not realising you are also an expert on Ecuadorian constitutional matters. My bad, as I believe you kids would say.

By the way, the emoji thing is probably better being used on Instagram or Facebook, or whatever other social media site the children use.

Let's hope so, Q. Otherwise it's unlikely to be worth listening to.

AgArCu, in fairness I will concede your posts yesterday did attempt to 'contextualise' the announcement, albeit from your habitual position of negativity. However, the problem you have is that people don't believe you, and with good reason.

It wasn't that long ago that you were telling us you'd successfully manipulated the share in order to fulfil a client's purchases - the clear implication being you were a finance professional. Now you tell us you are in construction. Maybe you've had a recent career change? In any event, I don't know about other folk, but I don't tend to go to construction workers for financial advice. Then there's your story about hotel meetings and Chinese executives - incidentally, I rather enjoyed that one, but some people appeared to be dangerously taken in by it.

And then there's the issue of your backstory. You tell us you are 42 years old and run your own business. When I was in that position at your age I didn't have a spare minute in the day and I certainly didn't have time to spend hours posting on social media (it didn't exist then, but you get my point)

I take it you can see the problem? Your invented stories mean you have no credibility, so it's little wonder other posters question your motivation.

Pad, this was undeniably good news and of great significance for the company, despite the efforts of one or two people to denigrate it.

Brisvegas, thanks, but it's water off a ducks back. Bob the Builder is simply an angry and arrogant young man who has an hugely inflated opinion of himself and an overwhelming belief that only he is right. Bear in mind, he's a self-confessed liar who felt it necessary to use two identities. The other bloke simply doesn't count.