Member Info for addicknt

"Just that it will put investors off. Which it will" Are you sure about that? The article is dated today.

You're in back-pedal mode and it's amusing to watch. And the great thing is there's a lot more to come, although I don't imagine for one moment anyone on here will take advantage of your discomfort.

"stick with the person who is yet to be wrong about solg". Provided you ignore that person's suggestion no one will invest in the country under current circumstances. And who knows, when the financing is announced it could be another amusing egg-on-face moment? We wait with bated breath.

Fort, good post, although it's worth pointing out that we are far more advanced than others, who are literally years behind. Mind you, with the funding they have they can catch up. As you say, we mustn't lose our much heralded first mover advantage.

Eloro, as I said, perhaps she thinks she's too late to the party. She's obviously perfectly happy with the sovereign risk and recognises the country's great potential, but as far as Cascabel's concerned there are other players already in situ. Or do you think there's something else putting her off?

I know you're very depressed at the moment, so I'd highly recommend you watch the discussion Jerry referred to yesterday. It'll cheer you up no end.

I wonder if this investment is recognition that she's too late to the party at Cascabel and therefore she's going elsewhere?

Indeed it was, Jerry.

If only half of what they predict comes to pass, the value of what we're sitting on becomes mind-boggling. Exciting times.

Ever the optimist, that's me. But again, thanks for your guidance.

SH, I think you'll find I pointed that out yesterday, but thanks for your valuable input.

There was never any doubt about the legality of the directors purchases and let's hope your source is correct about good news.

Tesla, given that Darren uses his real name it's easy to verify the fact he lives in Ecuador. It's fascinating that both you and the Aussie Moron both presume to know about people's lives when of course neither of you have the faintest idea.

Fort, I won't disagree with you on that one. It's very odd.

Tesla, that wasn't my point. I was merely thanking Darren for his input. Sorry if that upsets you.

Fort, "Well...it stinks if it happens and guess we'll have to wait and see". Precisely, it hasn't happened and there's no evidence to suggest it may. So what's the point of getting excited about something which hasn't happened?

I agree that it would be good if the shares end up in the hands of someone like Barrick. However, my guess is Caldwell would prefer not to sell those shares and to seek alternative finance options.

Thanks, Darren. Many of us appreciate your local insights.

Eloro, it's April 16th. There's a long way to go and much will happen between now and then, and let's hope the trend of good news continues.

I do hope that wasn't too arrogant for you?

Mather, wrong. I've been ignoring the idiot, but when he posts something so outrageously stupid it merits a response. Of course, he's now scuttled off and is unlikely to accept he's just made a gigantic t1t of himself... again.

Fort, I agree with you about the 23p and said so at the time. It was a naive comment.

Just how thick are you? Read my posts on the matter you moron. You'll see that I'm the one saying there is no insider trading and have stated the reasons why there isn't.

And yes, in certain circumstances you can get Stock Exchange approval for what otherwise may be described as insider trading.

I can say without equivocation you are the most stupid individual I've ever encountered on any financial bb.

DBW, so I'll ask you the question. Do you genuinely believe a director would so openly and blatantly engage in an illegal practice? They risk jail for so doing and for what? A few thousand quid? Not a chance.

As I said earlier, there are two possible explanations; 1) there are no price sensitive discussions currently taking place, or 2) they received clearance from the Stock Exchange.

If anyone was going to trade on the inside they'd do so anonymously and they'd do it for far more money than a the pittance invested by CS and SC. You most certainly wouldn't RNS it - that's a bit like nicking a car and videoing yourself outside your home address. Actually, that's a bad example because in this country the rozzers still wouldn't bother to arrest you.

DBW, who are you referring to? SC and CS?