RE: trellis3512 Mar 2019 17:40
I also would agree we were fed bullshxt from the release of EMS 1001 RNS to-date, people invested in this company based on the fact if the tobifera was dry or poor we had springhill to fall back on, ref EMS 1001 RNS dated 21/06/18, and i QUOTE.
"In the shallower Springhill target, the well encountered over 20m of hydrocarbon shows. The shows in the Springhill target were associated with elevated gas with peaks of over 137,000 ppm, as measured against referenced background gas levels of less than 7,000 ppm outside of the zone and the Company is currently evaluating the effective net pay across the Springhill section encountered."
Unquote, it turned out to be a thin layer of coal, sorry guys & gals.
Who in their right minds would trust these bandits now.