Member Info for Abkaz

Didn't you promise to leave?

Bye. Hopefully you can discover a life and never post here ever again.

Don’t worry. The Frontera family will be updated any day now.

I hear you Soss. This company can’t even get liquidated in a timely manner.

You don’t have to be left wing to think you’re insufferably tedious mate.

Half this board would believe that SN personally kicking them in the knackers was a sign the master plan was taking shape.

He's probably just embarrassed he worked voluntarily (?) for years as an inside man helping the company avoid any sort of scrutiny from shareholders.

I don't think you're quite as clever as you think you are Madpunter. Maybe keep your conspiracy ramblings confined to a blog or Russell Brand's Twitch stream in future.

He is Rainbow Rider

Whats with all the randoms coming out of the woodwork claiming they’re long term shareholders today? You get everything with this board.

Obviously I wasn’t addressing you. Your tedious spamming somehow adds even less to the board now than under your previous RainbowRider account.

Why are you threatening shareholders? Who are you?

Speak for yourself mate. I care. The problem is: if the majority of shareholders continue to publicly express satisfaction with the current state of affairs, which they do by regularly approving messages asserting that the company’s best approach is to avoid all communication with shareholders, it validates that position and disincentivises reestablishing lines of communication.

Ricardo is right. Even when a company is subject to regulatory scrutiny, it can be difficult to determine the operations of a company and the motivations of directors. Every shareholder has to approach an investment with a huge dose of skepticism because money is constantly at risk. In this circumstance we have multitudes of evidence demonstrating that the company hasn’t historically worked in the best interest of shareholders and now we are expected to divine the company’s intentions from messages conveyed by an anonymous third party? Gimme a break.

We don’t even have anything to substantiate the claim, which has become accepted on this board without any evidence, that the company can’t communicate due to some unspecified legal threat.

I’ve never heard of anything like that before. I can’t even really think of a good reason why that might be the case. Any entity connected, or in conflict, with the company will be aware of the existence of shareholders and this board is public so all the ‘sleuthed’ information can be easily accessed.

I don’t have any answers about how to change the situation but it is clear the answer isn’t: every shareholders should independently try to establish a private link the company. This perpetuates an information asymmetry and neuters the advantage we have as a large engaged shareholder base.

Personally I don’t see any problem with drafting a letter undersigned by the hundreds (?) of active shareholders demanding a basic level of formal communication and presenting it to the company via the supposedly verified channel. The suggestion that by applying pressure on the company to reestablish communication could harm our prospects is strange, even suspicious, and there are plenty of reasons why it could be done for nefarious reasons.

The state of what’s going on here is beyond comprehension. People being shouted down by a mob for questioning the veracity of covert messages being allegedly to conveyed to some guy (?) from the company that stole all our money and hasn’t communicated to shareholders for over five years.

He is Rainbow. The guy will blindly follow any messiah and aggressively post 300 times a day about it. No shame.

Someone questioned the dear leader lol.

It means absolutely nothing and is almost entirely irrelevant to O&G which consistently works in challenging jurisdictions.

It worked well when you made 100 posts a day about trusting Zaza on your Rainbow Rider account.

His posts are about you because you’ve posted on this board about 3000 times, since appearing shortly before delisting, as a self-proclaimed intermediary dropping nudges and winks that news is just around the corner. Well we’ve turned the corner about 5 times and still nothing.

We don’t know if your intentions are benign or not and it’s obviously useful to have court proceedings updated to speculate upon but it’s hard not to conclude that the company is using this slow drip of information to avoid issuing any genuine updates.

P*** mate I have a life changing amount of money tied up in this company. And yes I would communicate because the argument that you can’t send a message because of ongoing legal proceedings is ludicrous.