Member Info for A1EX

EtHiO.

Never said we have flanks, please be correct.
We have acquired the Tipil license. Just because it hasn't been confirmed in an RNS, doesn't make it unfactual. All the evidence is there and freely available to access to the public, it's just you who doesn't seem to accept it.

The SP reacts to RNS statements, no facts being proved by PIs. That's the point of the posts, to give PI's visibility of something huge that has not been RNS'd yet. When it is confirmed, wave goodbye to 17p.

That license could be in their offices, in an unopened envelope. Until opened, doesn't need to be RNS'd. They can be selective about when to open and make it public. The administrative bodies in Russia have confirmed it, doesn't mean Eurasia have to until received and 'in hand' in their office. That's down to them to 'open' and engage with the formal handling of the exploration license.

I invite all investors to go check for yourselves by the below links:

ROSNEDRA WEBSITE:

Access / download the following schedule (translate website to english):
TPI Vault 22.07.2020
http://www.rosnedra.gov.ru/page/76.html?mm=289&ml=121
View entry number 1717.

Open in Excel and translate. Application is ????????????? (satsified).
Check the co-ordinates. Exactly as per the Eurasia indicated Tipil license zone.
Site area - 24.5km.sq. Exactly as per the site area confirmed by Eurasia.

It's there for all to see.
Shall I provide more links to confirm the license has been registered to Kovinsky Stone? Why not.

Link to Formal Russian Business Register Site:
https://www.rusprofile.ru/
Search for Tovinsky Stone ( ??????????? ?????? ) - Enter in Russian.
Page will load, scroll down to licenses.....

Oh.... What's that? A license acquired for exploration dated 20 June for the Ural area... Now where Typil.. Yeah in the Urals.

And you wanna talk what's genuine and what isn't?

Thats not investing. That's gambling.

When is investing not a waiting game?

No problEm Bread.
Anymore questions, just ask, the decenT 'genuine' investors Here will be more than happy to assist.

It's obvIOus who the 'players' are in here.

I can back up my posts Ethio:

https://twitter.com/R1EXG/status/1263795304748457984?s=20

Can you and tell me what's false about my statement?

No, thought not.

Oh it was Ethi.

He's still knocking about lol.

Hi Bread...

Yes, awaiting formal issue. So as yet, not formally confirmed. The RNS merely is an update that it has achieved approval from the 'federal' bodies.

Once federal and other 'associated' departments and bodies approve. This is collated and signed off by the URAL area then sent to Rosnedra for formal issue / stamping. ROWKA may be able to correct me if wrong here. There's multiple levels.

The images in the tweet are taken from official Russian company register sites. A bit like our companies house. I'm confident in the confirmations. The application is also marked as 'satisfied' on the Rosnedra website.

I'm sure whoever it is they're not too keen on new (and longer term) investors being reminded that we have a license fresh and ready to be confirmed in an RNS.

Can't filter a green box... Who is that above my previous post lol!! No doubt some nonsense being spouted!

Breadington.

No. Licenses like these are not handed out frequently. This license took almost a year to procure, it's a full exploration rights license for 24.5km IIRC.

People have massively underestimated the commercial worth of WK and the surrounding area. Kovinsky Stone (Eurasia Subsidary) now have over 100km.sq exploration zone in this area. This is huge and largely has gone unnoticed by quite a few.

A proper Thread title...

https://twitter.com/R1EXG/status/1288364858950520833?s=20

Hi Ian,

That’s a good call. I’ll check Sentinel later today.

Extremely high risk. The dangers of trading on technical analysis only. If you were to read charts only, you would of been looking for substantial pull back / reversal IMO. Any ‘smart’ trader IMO would of taken some fundamentals on board before committing. But there we go.

Mr NIN.

Could of been a huge spread bet. Highly likely IMO. Even the initial return price of 15p could of been enough to wipe out many accounts.

Hi Ian.

Hope you’re keeping well.
Yes, our ‘friends of the share’ SpikeyJ hasn’t been seen since. Clearly affected by the companies return and safe to say and suggest in a negative context.

Hi IFOXXX.

With respect, on this I disagree. The only reason, is user retainment.
Obviously during the Wireless Connect, we obtained a substantial amount of new users who largely are a RnB / Hip Hop / Rap fan base. We want to keep them so IMO changing genre and making a showcase of someone not fitting within this genre perhaps could have led to loss of users?

Nelly was a huge start, still has pulling power IMO and to offer the event as free, I'm sure will have kept solid user engagement from newly acquired users.

Completely agree on the A-List requirement.

MVR + LN are charging for the O2 Academy Series so we can rest assured that the artist/s will be substantial names. John Legend, who in his own right, a massive star, was free. So it's very fair to assume that anything they charge for, will be an artist in huge demand....

Hype....

Presenting facts Horse. What have you got? Just the same old nonsense, nothing to contribute, just relying on others to provide the material. You bought on the spike and in complete denial that 'YOU' are accountable for this, nobody else. Simples.

Is anything on ADVFN credible?????????

Good point Whatshares.

The primary goal is driving traffic to the MVR App, not YouTube.
Obviously we don't have MVR Viewing stats and there's a big chance we never will.

Hi KOK.

IMO, somethings going on. Look at Nellys IG page, his latest post has 125k views / plays whereas the MVR related post right next to it only has 21.5k. Both posted same day. Both the same type of post.

Now there is a correlation between the amount of views and comments. That's a fair notion, yeah?

The post which has 125k views (Not MVR related) , has 179 comments.
The MVR post, has 145 comments, but significantly less views. Doesn't seem right.