Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
@SteamyWee You're welcome to check my interactions with Laura2022 (aka Riddler) in my archive.
DMTR Jun 20 "CEO was finances and he confirmed 12mths+ FROM today !!"
DMTR Raises one month later and destroys the share price
PYC May 23 "This is equivalent to over 12mths funding too ,extends cash runway till 2025"
PYC Raises a few months later and destroys the share price
Both times took abuse off this clown posts removed etc. for saying there will be placing prior to it happening.
Here they are giving abuse to porky who says there will be a placing.
No I won't shutup.
Guilders….
I seriously hope you regain the money and the faith you have lost chap.. 🙏
Please remember you are more than welcome in the telegram group, like I said it’s not a cult…
OB
Share4. Sick of the rampant ramping.
OTT
I hope I'm wrong.
Can't read this board anymore.
They have lost credibility.
Sorry what was your point again? I should have been calling him out 2 years ago when I wasn't around?
This one in particular is so ironic (See point 2)...
Porky9 Premium Member
Posted in: VAL
Posts: 6,183
Price: 52.50
Strong Buy
Burying Some Myths - 25 Oct 2021 21:16
1. I have a vested interest in the business doing well. I am a shareholder; I’m adding to my position, and I have total confidence in the business delivering as outlined. I am not at T1 level but getting there.
2. Before I arrived at this forum this was possibly one of the most negative forums on LSE with historic shareholders doing nothing but moan 24/7 it was a god dam awful place to visit. It was certainly not a place to visit if you want to find out about the business. In fact, you were actively put off from investing Imo.
3. I have gone out on a limb to make as much noise as possible to bring attention to this business and attract new investors and I will continue to do so. I have continually kept reposting links and information in the hope that someone new visiting will pick it up and go onto researching the opportunity and hopefully join us.
4. The majority of the LTH could not even be bothered to ask questions of the new management team when they had the opportunity to do so. Why do I know this? Put simply I know who the bulk of the questions were raised by from conversations with fellow investors and frankly some LTH were so dam negative they couldn’t see any return here and simply didn’t bother.
5. Sentiment is finally changing, thank God, new investors are backing the business, the business is finally re-rating and the market cap of the business improving but it still has along way to go.
6. I have continually said that I believe fair value pre contracts is at the peer average 80p line 52m mcap and that I expect this to trade in the 74p to 85p until news breaks. On contract confirmation we will be well north of £65m mcap value £1 SP heading towards £130m mcap value £2 SP. That is my call. It has not changed since the start.
Now some here may not like my ultra bullish stance, I get that, but how can anyone somehow think that its in anyway acceptable for ells-13 to post here all weekend 22 posts on Sunday and today telling everyone to sell so that can try and get back in a few pence cheaper a good thing? It is not, it is damaging to this business. Further it is distracting for new investors visiting here who want to discover more.
Now unless you are shorting yourself or have sold out and want to get in cheaper, for the vast majority here that are long we want the company to continue its success and its share price to continue improving. This is my point. Why not shout about it, we have a lot of positivity here. All shareholders should get behind this great business.
Pork's
Share4 - You're absolutely spot on with what you say in this quote "I'm here because I'm sick of people shutting down counter arguments on this board with personal attacks."
So here is some balance...
https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/porky9/?page=113
You couldn't be more wrong. I'm here because I'm sick of people shutting down counter arguments on this board with personal attacks. From my experience of using these forums for many years those attacks are often a sign something is seriously off and it's typically the same posters doing the round on these small illiquid full of promise stocks.
Nothing more or less.
Agreed but how he thinks might be different. Why would anyone post almost every day and night on a stock for about three years with two placings and 5p gone. Would you post at 11pm and 4am almost everyday on a stock you are not invested in?
Then the same person who was actively ramping up numerous stocks has not done so in any other stock that I can see since 4D closed.
I think today proved to everyone he was not a potential buyer something I have always said. If you had intentions to buy you would not try and jeopardise the deal by posting on the EUDA site to try and stop the merger you would actually want it done regardless of your buy in price. He lost his money so for whatever reason blames us.
Val was cash rich when CLX was signed from Kings and after placing at 10p but he never invested when it took a heavy drop. All the signs support what I say. I knew then no chance he would buy.
PM2022 - you say 'Porky is only here because he lost all his money on 4D and is bitter with VAL' - if you actually did lose all your money on 4D wouldn't you be likely to be bitter towards 4D?
That is down to market perception not always correct. 95% thought 201 will never happen and that TRX will raise zero.
I always said it would. So when it happens we will see where we go and who was right. Also not just about 201.
I think you agree which is why you are here.
The usual personal attack
Why would anyone listen to someone that has been recommending this as a strong buy for several years when the price has done very little else but fall and what was supposed to happen hasn't?
Oh but it's different this time right?
Why would anyone listen to someone that has been twisting facts for three years. You just move from one thing to another when you are proven wrong on every occasion. You clearly said TRX will not raise a penny but now you move to something else.
Drug development is expensive. It costs millions to develop a drug through preclinical stages. The assets and collaborations they have allow world class compounds to move through the preclinical stages with much lower risks. It will also attract huge revenue which is shortly to come. Imagen was generating revenue of millions of pounds and PYC also generate decent revenue and some of the other collaborations provide value by giving compounds the highest chances to progress with the technology they have and that allows us to get a huge preclinical deal which is the end goal.
Almost every company requires funding on AIM. Val only burns 2 million and with lab revenue projections will likely reduce to 1 million over the next 12 months with another 1/2 staff once revenue starts to come through. When 201 gets done we will have more cash than what we are burning.
Great strategy, low risk, low cost and huge potential.
Val will get the funding it needs from the 201 deal plus lab contracts. As stated in the presentation it is expected this year. The company has value at this price both short term and long term. If I am not mistaken REDX did a placing at market value yesterday and if Val had such plans it would have already happened.
I am happy to hold and add where necessary as I think we will gap up or rise fast when news breaks and we should continue to move as more news and rumours are released.
The potential of 40,50,60p is very real compared to a temporary minimal false drop.
Porky is only here because he lost all his money on 4D and is bitter with VAL. He has been making up lies for 3 years.
@Seancadman
I wanted to take the opportunity in the open debate here to address your comments as you appreciate i see things totally different to the way you do,
You see, from my perspective VAL is a commercial business NOT a charity. It is set up on the AIM specifically so that it can access and raise funds and they have done that successfully numerous times. far too many times really.
BUT we are at a point where that constant requesting of funds and support of shareholders feels like we are taken for granted, there is an end to ones generosity and the BODs continued failure to deliver has resulted in continual erosion of shareholder value so much so that at the previous AGM shareholders were wanting no more of it, a high number wanted changes to the BOD but the sole declared interested party Adam, overrode the smaller investor and voted to maintain the status quo.
I wont list all the commercial blunders made to date, too many to list and no point going over old ground again but you have paid for each and every one of them through placings but here we are again, yet another placing will be required, there is no alternative.
Also, due to the change in business direction it has IMO dwarfed more into a lab start up business and certainly proving to be one of lifestyle. Suzy's remarks about supporting her family and Stella "Gerald Ratner" moment were specifically telling. Meanwhile, the BOD have continued in luxury at your expense, you have paid their wages and bonuses whilst they outright refuse to Invest alongside you whilst your investment has been destroyed.
So as i see it, It is the BOD and only the BOD that are culpable for where we are now. You mention 201 but had it gone to a well funded partner over two years ago, it could be further down phased trials by now not gathering dust. This was the BODs decision.
Now as it stands, VAL will need placing support again, there is no possible way any funds from THX can land with VAL in time, its a FACT, i can see this as clear as day. Meanwhile, the ramping here is off the scale to lure people in that will highly likely lose money when the placing lands. I will be impressed if Suzy can raise 20m at 4p for £800k BUT it could be enough to bridge the gap until THX do pay/ IF they go on and raise in 2024 and that will be the call.
VERY shorty VAL will need to propose a placing and EGM and it will be down to shareholders to either get behind them and support it or NOT.
I have my own views, i personally would like to see BOD changes but we are where we are and IF you believe and are confident in this BOD to deliver long term then it's your call if you want to dig deep again or not.
But don't get deluded by tweets and posts from rampers feeding what you want to hear rather than reality. There is a clear objective here to pump the SP to help get that placing away. Shortly this will be perfectly clear.
Good luck to you
Ahem bruv, add patientinvetors bettong monies to that lawsuit, my winnings!!
Isn't there a telegram link as that li k is via twitter which is a ball ache
Pj
Why don't you just report to the FCA. I'd like them to take a look at this forum and people that have been posting strong buy reco's for years.
I am invested in Valirx, I have been for 3 years, my aim, like most most on here is to make money, I read the posts and cheer the rampers and disregard anyone who knocks the stock, that’s the nature of wanting a return, I have research the company and decided to invest.
I read Porkys posts and yes he is a different breed, he makes me angry, primarily because he is trying to devalue my daughters inheritance, in a way mine is a selfish view.
I’m not invested here solely to find a cure for cancer I am here to enrich my life.
But when I take a minute to think about what the people at Valirx are trying to do it puts Porkys actions into perspective.
201 has been on hold to a certain extent for a few years, time that lives could have been saved, so for a minute I forget my selfish yearning to make money and cheerlead the work these people are putting into saving lives.
For that reason I hope this comes to fruition and that the derampers take some time to consider their motives.
And you are stuck in 2022 , already in PM2023
You are on wrong side of the wall, try opposite direction, may be then JWallows you have it
That document is almost as boring as you, Bore-saci06.
No, that is not the document I am after.
Another deramper. Check posting history.
Https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1847846/000149315223033443/form424b3.htm is the latest prospectus 222 pages with 24 selling shareholders.
I was telling everyone he is not well. What lengths to go to posting on that stock.
He is a danger, what next?
Wow, that is desperate from Porky... He's litteraly claiming to know TheoremRX's business (when he doesn't)
Anyone signed up to Stocktwits would do well to report that post to TheoremRX. It surely is 100% Libel.
JWallows - provide the location of the prospectus please and shut the pig up
TheoremRX - that looks like libel from Porky9 to me, surely you have lawyers :-)