Stephan Bernstein, CEO of GreenRoc, details the PFS results for the new graphite processing plant. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Mm,
You are just proving what I posted earlier;
- Posting 'good news' on the basis of a metric (photographs by OceanMec) that is irrelevant.
- Accusing "-ve" posters of not being invested.
- Not being able to answer valid points raised by others, so just resorting to petty name calling.
You are not the first evangelical we have seen with this modus operandi and, sadly, I doubt you will be the last.
Lol Penguins, why do you post endless negativty on a share you're not invested, incessantly trying to deter and discourage, which you have done for several years now, what an utter waste of your valuable ....Gl ;-)
oops - that got messed up - last two paragraphs in the wrong place
Ocelot,
You are assuming that shareholders who voted in favour of proposals that were required for the company to continue operating were in full support of the company which is questionable, The low number of shares that were voted illustrate that most shareholders are disinterested in the long term future of UKOG.
Another flaw in your argument is that shareholders are individuals that hold a certain number of shares - the number of shares voted in either case does not necessarily equate to the number of investors. It's possible those with larger shareholdings were more likely to be in favour of the status quo (eg PW- if they still have shares) ie enabling the BoD to continue with their plans.
By your definition I must support the BoD and everything it does as I was not a supporter rodders campaign, yet.....
I suspect, despite a better response than the AGM/GM voting, many like me would not support an ex-ramper in a campaign seemingly driven by revenge because rodders failed to adequately research beyond UKOG RNS.
MM
are you seriously suggesting that my "Strong Buy" opinion will some how have influence over a grown adults investment decision.........ha ha ha ha ha ha ..........then more fool them.
Why post about Oceanmec posting a picture of another well site (earlier today), or wishing their employees at the Basur site happy Eid? As they didn't mention, or show a picture of Basur, in today's Facebook post surely that's bad news, as in your world the Eid post meant they hadn't stopped work at Basur, so does no mention today mean they've packed up?
'greatly encouraged by Oceanmec's recent Facebook posts which suggest that operations are still underway'
By your definition I must support the BoD and everything it does as I was not a supporter rodders campaign, yet.....
I suspect, despite a better response than the AGM/GM voting, many like me would not support an ex-ramper in a campaign seemingly driven by revenge because rodders failed to adequately research beyond UKOG RNS.
Ocelot,
You are assuming that shareholders who voted in favour of proposals that were required for the company to continue operating were in full support of the company which is questionable, The low number of shares that were voted illustrate that most shareholders are disinterested in the long term future of UKOG.
Another flaw in your argument is that shareholders are individuals that hold a certain number of shares - the number of shares voted in either case does not necessarily equate to the number of investors. It's possible those with larger shareholdings were more likely to be in favour of the status quo (eg PW- if they still have shares) ie enabling the BoD to continue with their plans.
MM
are you seriously suggesting that my "Strong Buy" opinion will some how have influence over a grown adults investment decision.........ha ha ha ha ha ha ..........then more fool them.
Why post about Oceanmec posting a picture of another well site (earlier today), or wishing their employees at the Basur site happy Eid? As they didn't mention, or show a picture of Basur, in today's Facebook post surely that's bad news, as in your world the Eid post meant they hadn't stopped work at Basur, so does no mention today mean they've packed up?
'greatly encouraged by Oceanmec's recent Facebook posts which suggest that operations are still underway'
By your definition I must support the BoD and everything it does as I was not a supporter rodders campaign, yet.....
I suspect, despite a better response than the AGM/GM voting, many like me would not support an ex-ramper in a campaign seemingly driven by revenge because rodders failed to adequately research beyond UKOG RNS.
Ocelot: I think it’s wrong to assume that 7.15% represents the sum of disillusioned holders here. There must be a large number of stale bulls who realise that, while this Board is discredited and appears to be living on a hand (yours) to mouth (theirs) basis, it’s too late to do anything useful about it. Once you've lost 95% of your investment, you tend to leave the rest there, on a “you never know” basis.
What a nonsense offering me to buy shares from 0.18p and the share drops to 0.16p .haha I’m glass o haven’t got much to worry about.
Whoops, not sure where the "W" came from, should be ZYX098.
ZYW098,
I am not trying to prove anything, I am expressing my personal opinion on the basis of the information available to me.
Rodders Jones rendered a service to us all in putting a figure on the % of shareholders who "have grown a dislike" for management, about 7.15%.
Rodders Jones was trying to drum up support for his stance so either he went about it the wrong way or the support he collected put a figure on the shareholders with a negative opinion who agreed with him at the time.
Ocelot,
"And, in very many (but not all) cases, MM is quite right to make this claim."
So where is your proof?
Your equating the 7.15% who supported Rodders Jones campaign is equal to the number who hold a -ve viewpoint is not valid.
That 7.15% also exceeded the number who voted on the AGM Resolutions, so using that data it could be claimed that the -ve's are in the majority of those who express an opinion?
"Did I miss anything?"
Market makers are manipulating the price so they can get in cheap ahead of 2, 5 10p by month end?
0 0 0
A nice 6.7m buy at 0.172p suggests that there is confidence...Gla :-)
Ibug,
You are, of course, welcome to your own analysis of the composition of posts on this board.
ocelot
I have to say this. But they are only negative to you and not everyone else on this board who are more than capable of unbiased thought imo. Over 75% of posts on this board are positive with the other 25% being made up to suit the posters trading position imo.
You've lost me, Ibug.
My opinion is "strong buy" which I have explained in previous posts.
The fact of 7.15% (if I remember right) of support amongst shareholders for Rodders Jones's campaign headlined his site, which he updated each week.
All are free to judge for themselves the percentage of posts on this board which are negative, but my opinion is that it exceeds by a very large margin 7.15%.
ocelot
I have to say. If you hadn't posted so many times on this bb the % of negative posts would be far lower imo. After all who are you to judge? Yet another post by you but not based on any form of fact. You really must give an opinion.
- Claims that those who are 'negative' aren't invested.
-------------------------------------
And, in very many (but not all) cases, MM is quite right to make this claim.
Rodders Jones has shown us that support amongst shareholders for those who have "grown to dislike management" is about 7.15% (if I remember right).
Negative posts on this board exceed by a very large margin 7.15% of all posts.
Mm running true to form of the evangelical rampers;
- Repetitively posting nonsense, with no rational thought or argument.
- Unrealistic claims of 'imminent success' by using metrics that mean nothing.
- Claims that those who are 'negative' aren't invested.
- Tries to deflect attention from his/her own agenda of mindless ramping by accusing others of having an agenda (talk about pot / kettle...).
- Resorts to name calling when challenged with facts by others.
Did I miss anything?
Lol Headinthesands and Ninetails ( and a cohort of similar posters ), you call me out as an investor of AIM stocks , and call me deceptive and disingenous on risking my hard earned cash on investments that don't always go to plan, yet both of you have over 3000 posts each ****ging off Ukog, Angs, Ujo and every of other UK onshore explorer over the last few years, incessant repetitive negativity on shares you're not invested and no positive posts on any stocks where you are invested....ha ha ha ha ....and you call me deceptive and disingenuous....ho ho ho ho....why don't you come clean and explain exactly what your agenda is, because it has nothing to do with investing in AIM stocks......you couple of desperate snide muppets. ;-)))
Absolutely Ninetails. And a depressingly frequent modus operandi with AIM stocks like UKOG that are based on nothing but sentiment, hope and dreams, rather than reality. Such shares attract the deliberately deceptive and disingenuous, because they're the perfect vehicle for short-term traders looking to pick the pockets of the more naive as they exit with their quick marginal gain.
Moneymunch and his posts is just the latest in a never-ending series of copy n paste temptations solely designed to spike the unwary. He's not the first and definitely won't be the last (sadly).
Moneymuch will probably make a profit in ukog, he is an experienced trader, and always thinks he has bought in at the bottom, but he will ramp (copy and paste) this to the high heavens and when he reaches his target price will be gone, regardless of the fundamentals, and leave many gullible investors spiked, just beware of wolves in sheep’s clothing, and read his posting history...
I remember them announcing 500 but not 600. Should be 700 this week.
Jeez , can you imagine being stuck behind 900 oil tankers on the way to the refinery....beep beep!!! :-)))
Not even got to 900 oil tankers yet. I'm sure they will announce it.
Loxley planning starts Tuesday 27th July.....hopefully some good news from the turkey drill soon and I'm thinking horeshill must be close to its 1000th OIL tanker or has that milestone already passed?