The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
That was unexpected. It seemed to be, above all, money coming out of 88E and looking for a new home.
I’m sorry to post such a lot, but what we’re seeing now is absolutely typical of these people. Ocelot’s latest off-sider, Lucky-Strike, has been called into action from the Anguish site to protect Ocelot’s exposed rear end here. If you've said you’ve filtered someone, you can’t then try to rebut their points yourself, can you? There will soon be others of them, there’s quite a few of these PR people about at the moment. It may mean something’s about to happen at UKOG, I suspect. What can it be?
Oh, and Ocelot’s posts are not factual.
I've nothing to do with PR.
Lucky-Strike, the constant bashing is tedious but you are accustomed to seeing it on another board we both frequent and I suspect it is a phenomenon common to a lot of these boards.
UKOG's history has been a chequered one, to put it mildly, but it HAS come down a very long way, is valued at very little and has the Basur-3 drill in Turkey approaching in the very near future (which does need to be funded in full, of course, when needed) + the Loxley inquiry towards the end of July.
And why would Ocelot have me on filter? Does anyone believe this? No, it’s more likely that he /she prefers, understandably, not to answer the question as to being a paid mouthpiece for UKOG or its agents. I’d do the same if I were involved in his/her trade, since in the event of an eventual inquiry into the actions of AIM-listed companies and their associates, it would be difficult for someone in the pay of such a company to justify having denied being paid by it on these sites for puffing its shares, wouldn’t it?
Remember Rodders Jones has shown us all that the naysayers represent about 6.5% of share capital.
The conclusion is obvious, that the enormously negative bias of this board's posts do not reflect the opinion of the silent majority of shareholders, about 93% of whom voted in support of management's resolutions at the GM.
Ninetails,
Have no idea what oofyprosser posted, have him on filter.
Given the quantity of negative posts on this board, it does no harm at all to post an alternative point of view and let PIs judge for themselves (which they will do anyway!).
oofyprosser I completely agree with your last post , ocelot you are now trying to deceive new investor, with your continual optimistically posts daily, it doesn’t look good on your behalf.... be honest ...
Their most unpleasant trick is to try to provoke well researched posters on these sites to say that they’re not invested in the shares, and/or wouldn’t touch it with a long stick. They then run off, thrilled, to LSE’s site admin. LSE makes a fair bit of money out of these companies so they’re only too happy to accept the shills’ complaint that this well researched poster is here merely to disrupt, as evidenced by their not holding the shares. The person then gets banned from the site.
The moral of this is, don’t allow yourself to be provoked into discussing your shareholding status. Me, I’ll be interested in adding at a lower price. Not just yet.
Oofy excellent post and completely sums up the sad rampers/paid rampers.
Ocelot: you PR types are pretty smooth but you’re not pulling the wool over the eyes of many people on here, I think. UKOG are paying you, are they not, directly or indirectly, for all this disingenuous stuff you put out on its behalf, just as Anguish does for the similar job you do over there? And it now seems that Ozzy sits at the next desk, or at your feet, learning the tricks of your murky trade from you. Dear oh dear. It’s a game to you, quite an amusing one, though finally quite unfulfilling, I should imagine. It’s been part of their life savings at stake for some of the people on here reading your guff. It’s not very nice really, is it?
Changed my mind, unfiltering Ibug.
Ocelot, don't do that.....feel the love
Ocelot, a non invested , and divorced is my guess....with that attitude ibug couldn't be anything else
Time I filtered you, Ibug - it was a simple enough question.
If you are that concerned go back over all my previous posts.
So you are not invested now but may buy in at some stage, is that what you are saying?
An good investor is someone who makes money by buying and selling shares. You really don't have to fall in love with them though. That is probably like most marriages if you look at the number of divorces.
AME is the operator 100%.
"Looks like your last 3 drills didn't go so well at UKOG". Does that mean you're a non-investor, too?
Ibug, now that's you showing your true colours.....proving your earlier comment wasn't meant to be a joke....no, problem.....everyone is entitled to their opinion.......even the ones who are wrong
50%
Ibug,
In all logic, what have UKOG's last 3 drills got to do with AME's drill at Basur-3?
ozzy
"the drill will do the talking"
"let the drill do the talking......very soon"
"a fool speaks when he has to say something......let the drill bit do the talking"
"the drill will do my talking"
"the drill will give you my updates......very soon"
"the drill will do the talking....very soon"
"Let the drill do the talking"
Now how did that go?
Looks like your last 3 drills didn't go so well at UKOG. Are you going for a fourth or will it be a go forth and multiply?
https://irpages2.equitystory.com/websites/rns_news/English/1100/news-tool---rns---eqs-group.html?article=26300531&company=ukog
https://irpages2.equitystory.com/websites/rns_news/English/1100/news-tool---rns---eqs-group.html?article=27263148&company=ukog
https://irpages2.equitystory.com/websites/rns_news/English/1100/news-tool---rns---eqs-group.html?article=30354960&company=ukog
Ibug, or a backtrack on a snide remark.....like the " joke " you've just made about me....problem is you're usually the very serious one...... anyway Ocelots a Yorky bar like me, ha ha. He who laughs last........didn't get the joke
I'm not sure "technically" and opinion should ever be used in the same sentence.
ozzy52 Don't you ever see the funny side in anything. It was in jest and I'm pretty sure that is how Ocelot took it but In will stand corrected. A bit of fun to break up the constant rubbish posted by some. Perhaps you only have the breaking strain of a mars bar.
Should perhaps add to my previous post: am looking for the share price to rise for other than pump and dump reasons, but also consider the share to be considerably oversold at the present time.