We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
“ Yet you claim we are all trying to recoup from this point.”
You missed this bit of my post on your cut and paste.
Gino
"My point is that you use £28 as the reference point for your posts when the price only briefly hit this"
It doesn't matter if the eq sp only hit it briefly, the fact it did means it's the high.
Compare that eq sp £28 to today's Nasdaq IPO price of 683p.
The 683p is around 30% above the eq sp 589p rthm(now trmr) achieved in 2017, after the previous bullish comments following the previous US Election in 2016.
What's do you think of today's Nasdaq IPO price then?
STiT - you truly are an utter moron. My point is that you use £28 as the reference point for your posts when the price only briefly hit this in the last ten year. Yet you claim we are all trying to recoup from this point.
MORON.
brubru24
I think your wrong my friend, he's no Parrot,
He's a FRUIT BAT.
Bru
"Tremor is doing well"
Where are the Q2/H1 expectations to show what impact losing Alphonso, data provider has had?
The IPO is as predicted.
Watch:
the overhang.
Investigations into rtb/fraud.
court cases.
Placing.
In terms of doing well, the latest audited final figures, fy2020, from the company speak for themselves.
Total net revenue increased by only 12% to $184.3 million (2019: $164.0 million). Only $20m!!
Adj Ebitda up only £100k(2019 $60.4m)
These figures include a full year contribution from Unruly(2019 nil) and rthm(fy2019 8 months)
""The Company traded strongly during 2020 as a whole, achieving a 12% increase in net revenues to 184.3 million (2019: $164.0 million), primarily driven by the performance of our Programmatic activities generating an increase of 30% to $161.6 million (2019: $124.2 million) as a result of our strategic shift to focus on our Programmatic activities as a key growth driver""
Check the table in the results - fy2020 inc full year from Unruly & Rthm.
Revenues up ONLY 2%
Net revenues up ONLY 12%
GP up ONLY 10%
https://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Final-Results-100321.pdf
"so for the rthm/blnx(now trmr) holders who were buying/holding in Jan 2014 before the big crash are down around 70% on that holding."
And your point is? As Blinkx is the same company as Tremor. The business model is moved and Tremor is doing well. You are just not capable of recording that which is strange as normally after a while parrots get the message and repeat it but you must be a special parrot that can't do that. lol
Gino,
"I said the “the price barely touched this”. "
Now that you agree with my calc and it isn't utter BS as you originally claimed, I won't wait for an apology. I back up my posts with links.
Look at the blnkx(now rthm) IPO, 14 yrs ago, Sushovan Hussain & Mike Lynch, ex-Autonomy execs, were behind the IPO.
The IPO price was eq sp 530p (45p old money).
There are several holders here who got in at bnlx IPO and held at the eq sp around £28.
It explains why they don't want to hear of any red flags or industry challenges.
I said the “the price barely touched this”. Which would suggest that I agreed that this was the highest point. You clearly struggle to read or take anything in outside of your own closed mind.
Gino
"The “12 month high”. You are taking the highest reference point that the share ever reached "
So you accept my figures are correct, now that I have provided evidence?
Gino
I say 'buying/holding'.
What part of the word 'holding' don't you understand?
I've been consistent in terms of the previous 'highs'.
Blnx(now rthm, merged with trmr) quadrupled in 2013-14 from 760p to around eq sp of £28 on the back of bullish comments.
They had a placing at 195p (eq sp of £23) in Dec 2013, which was also well received. The NEXT month, the sp crashed based on questionable events, followed by a profit warning, change of company name, business model, selling off operations.
Also in 2013-14 whilst the sp quadrupled, the Shares on Loan rose significantly (as they are now) and it was found Cayman Island outfit was shorting the shares.
Is it a coincidence that this time the Shares on Loan have trebled since Dec (when the CEO sold 1/3 of his holding) and Tosca is selling!!!!
Gdog - it’s been very hot over here - must’ve indulged in too much of that light therapy too ;-)
Gino,
I think he drank too much bleach.
The “12 month high”. You are taking the highest reference point that the share ever reached and playing that back to us all as the point that we all “got in” and are trying to recoup at.
Whilst SIMULTANEOUSLY ignoring the huge growth in the US ad tech companies and once again selecting the high point as you context that there is a “bubble”
And that’s why everyone thinks you have an agenda and sees you as a moron.
Ginodog
"He keeps banging on about old Blinkx investors buying at £28 (£2.80 in old money) and being desperate to recoup." "The price barely touched this price for a day. "
You've forgotten the merger terms, 33/28, when they merged with taptica in Apr 2019 to form trmr.
Read the facts for yourself.
12 month high = 235p
https://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/2014/11/12/shares/news-and-analysis/blinkx-licks-its-wounds-cgNwj6hwpAAyox11FUNbiM/article.html
10 for 1 share split = £23.50
https://www.stockmarketwire.com/article/5678159/RhythmOne-share-consolidation-approved.html
Rthm/taptica merger, now trmr = 33/28
https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/213872/rhythmone-board-recommends-merger-with-taptica-213872.html
Therefore, 12 month high x 10 x 33/28
= (235p x 10) x 33/28
= 2769p or around £28
current sp 800p
so for the rthm/blnx(now trmr) holders who were buying/holding in Jan 2014 before the big crash are down around 70% on that holding.
QED
In 2013-14 the eq sp rose on bullish comments and then crashed on events and a profit warning.
From Jan 2014 to July 2014, they fell from eq sp £28 (2769p) to around 400p, a massive 85% fall within 6 months.
In 2016-17 the eq sp again rose on bullish comments to 589p and fell back on events (industry challenges which I mentioned in 2017).
He keeps banging on about old Blinkx investors buying at £28 (£2.80 in old money) and being desperate to recoup.
The price barely touched this price for a day. Here’s the true journey of the Blinkx / Rhythm price. “Max” chart will show the utter BS and selective context that this man goes with.
https://uk.investing.com/equities/blinkx