We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
And Helpful you told this board you have never lost on this share.
Clearly you know [ I should say are told] when to buy and sell.
Every other poster on this board has either an actual loss or a paper loss.
RRR is run for the benefit of the few. You are one of the few.
Why can't you have the good grace / contrition to sit in the background like the rest of your privileged mates and stop coming on here and dragging more unsuspecting posters into this ridiculous share.
You are a really cruel and heartless individual with little or no shame.
Just like Dukey I am here solely out of disgust at a clear insider encouraging the naive to invest. Its wrong.
Dukey, you and the other trolls have got issues. Since 2021 I have bought shares in the market and sold shares in the market; I have converted CLNs, subscribed for CLNs and rolled over CLNs and I have exercised warrants and rolled them over, I have subscribed for shares.
Shares in RRR are tradeable securities, the hint is in the name; tradeable.
As you know in fact, given that you bought, you sold and you rebought but you got it wrong on the rebuy. Only one person responsible for your loss, buy a mirror if you want to track him down.
DYOR
Dukey, why not try being rational? If RRR pursues the claim to court RRR has to make a statement of loss. You are not as dumb as you make out: in your opinion what should loss claim quantum be?
Theeeeduke: The point is you have NOT DENIED what Helpful said that you made good money from RRR when AB was a star but YOU BOUGHT BACK in etc? If that is the case, that your MBO is not one of impartiality as norm but rather may appear to fit into the HEDGE FUND's text of 1 way neg on 1 stock? That is theory as it is NOT BALANCED with ASSET evaluation etc. IF, you had an OPEN mind, you would ask Helpful nicely, about his post and where that figure came from or his cals as norm. You stated you are posting to counter Helpful but that is not strictly correct either, as I was at the backend as well until I brought a status of sense and good conduct. Imagine, after life is over and one cant let RRR go, then , would not it become something one takes into the next life? So much is currently happening and one counts one's blessings that one can still enjoy the sunshine etc? That is why I wanted to stop posting on this forum due to it becoming a way of life of its us vs them, the shareholders who have any positivity --otherwise why hold.? It becomes tiresome, dont you think to concentrate on only 1 aspect. I talk about after life because many NDE say that moaning is a common feature? But one can chose not to think so but it does not change the fact, that it can become a feature of one's life at RRR if posting starts from 4am +.? Would it be considered in any way positive for one's life? I dont know but I dont think so, hence I wanted to NOT post as its getting only 1 sided.?
News, I post to counter Helpful`s absolute shameless ramps, which I believe he does with the sole purpose of luring in unsuspecting Pi`s to buy. The share price is down 90% since he started pumping it, and quoting 4 billion yesterday was comedy gold.
HELPFUL - At any point in 2021 when Mr Magic finished posting, would people have been better off listening to you or Mr Magic in regards to investing in RRR ???
Lets just wait and see how DRC pans out - I said last week I expect AB to come back without the money and another excuse !
Dukey made money back in the day when Andrew Bell was a superstar. He sold out making good money but greed made him buy back in and he gave up his gains: blames AB. His posting is because he is consumed with hatred for AB because he blames AB for his own greed and stupidly.
Way it goes.
Error: Should read, since both of you are NOT SHAREHOLDERS of RRR.. Why spend time posting ?
Theeeeduke: That is much better: "From theeeeduke: .. apparently the co can take out a loan below a certain threshold and not have to disclose it." Duke added: " but know RRR have previously had nasty surprise when they see these loans etc in the FINAL accounts."
My boss would ask me: Have you found out how much THIS THRESHOLD is? It would appear that IF it does NOT have to be disclosed, then the nature of the loan is not what is termed: "SIGNIFICANT" or significant enough to be reported. Yes or No? As for finding out in the accounts [final], why should that come as a "nasty surprise"? Again, not making sense as not having to disclose means it is not of a "DISCLOSABLE" amount? In the commercial world, NO ONE lends without some form of evidence. I said that even the rich classes cant get loans these days and the rise and boom of upmarket pawn brokers in London. It was the news and these look like banks. These upmarket pawn brokers are only by invitation and they take expensive Banksy or Rolex watches from £350k upwards. These loans [or bridging loans] are said to be for school fees etc which is presumed to be private school fees. Let's be more upfront --another poster and your goodself take turns at this same finance angle. Too much concentration and NOT enough of balance. Given BOTH of you are SHAREHOLDERS, then spending time day after day without adequate sleep [posting at 4am+ etc] must have some MBO ie Management by Objective surely? It cant be to SAVE US because one is aware that for ANY STOCK, even an FT stock, it is present as a factor in any analysis, more so on AIM, a more common feature. The London Stock Exchange explains what AIM is about: YOU, FOLKS ARE FUNDING GROWTH CO'S and shareholders are usually HNW akin to angel investors. IF one's analysis says, I think I want to move on, the BUTTON is there to chose to sell , surely or hold? Rather simple?
News, apparently the company can take out a loan below a certain threshold and not have to disclose it. I dont know the in`s and out`s, but know RRR have previously had nasty surprise when they see these loans etc in the final accounts.
P.S. As I stated that IF I went to the boss stating that it was "NOT" disclosed to the market per what you said, theeeeduke, I think I would be packing my tea mug knowing full well, that I would be out of a job. In the commercial world, they deal with facts and checking. Even checking 1 source is not enough. Hence, why I said, at best, "wild speculation" and one cant professionally deal with a stock WITHOUT knowing surely. ?
Theeeeduke: Ah, you have NOT commented on your earlier statement: Fact, no news. It should perhaps be, WAITING FOR NEWS surely. No AIM co can, NOT have an update on news given Stockbox interview from Kenya stated: next business is DRC award? Coming back to the financing you brought up, it would be considered, at best, wild speculation with regard to your statement: "UNLESS THEY RAISED MONEY AND NOT DISCLOSED TO THE MARKET." Since you have specifically addressed this to me, I will have to reply so please bear this in mind. IF, money has been raised , say by way of a placing,OFFICIALLY , then surely, by extension, there would be WILD GYRATIONS in the share price as norm with investors working their usual emotions? An RNS is a requirement if this is the case. But theory teaches us, IF funding is for a project that may increase value, then, it could be a positive outcome as norm. But, NOT DISCLOSED TO MARKET does appear to me, to be bordering on...I leave it blank. Companies House per my last check a few days ago HAS NO CHARGES, given ALL 15 discharged and duly filed. I have to ask the FINAL QUESTION: How does this affect any shareholder of RRR? Surely, one has to access one's investment in RRR on a rolling basis and come to a proper and professional ANALYSIS of this co, and as close to the standard of a broker note, even. IF, one own professional broker note spell buy, sell or hold, any funding going forward is not something unknown in AIM co's surely? Funding is generally a hot topic for spectators and one could say, they have no holding in any co, so, to pass time, they find funding an easy topic to post.? I dont know but the MKT IS NOT SAYING either way, and it is "MARKING TIME". Dare the MM's MARK RRR down with the ASSET [or assets] it has currently with JORC and I note that the MIKEI GOLD ASSET is now on the landing page with a video, so classed as asset with some 1.2moz gold? I hope that clarifies. For BALANCE, one should , like all broker notes, highlight assets, strategic review and potential assets. Yes, No? Tues, 26.3.24. As I stated, this endless debate has been going on SINCE BEFORE the RRR AGM of 16.3.24 but STILL NO ISSUANCE TODATE AND THIS IS FACT & EVIDENCED.
News - Going on all known facts - RNS`s and annual reports then its easy to work out RRR must be very low on cash. Unless they have raised money and not disclosed to the market.
Theeeeduke:
Verbatim highlights from theeeeduke: "..fact the co surely has to be running low on cash" & "fact , no news." I was keeping quiet until HAWAIIFIVE0 asked where I was despite my saying that convo's are only of 1 type of the majority vs shareholders in the minority here. So, I would like to respectfully comment as it is of significance: BOTH STATEMENTS FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE C O N F L I C T. How? IF, "fact" of NO NEWS [equates to 0 DRC progress by implication or by conclusion as one earlier stated on this forum] , then CASH refilling of Treasury follows as norm. So, therefore, it is NOT FACT. Substantive FACT is that there has been NO FINANCING POST RRR AGM, 16.2.24 WITH RESOLUTION 4 PASSED IE AUTHORITY TO ISSUE but NO ISSUANCE to-date, Tues, 26 Mar 2024. Ah, herein, what I have stated is FACT AND EVIDENCED. I hope you dont mind, given if I were to have gone to the boss and told him the above, I dont think I would last long in a job. So, I have correctly apportion FACT proven & evidenced vs fact that is not proven or not yet proven?
Tues, 26 Mar 2024. @11:06am. The share price still HAS NOT CHANGED - it is the same to buy and to sell but I have not yet checked this morning but did so yesterday.
Plus the fact no news and the fact the company surely has to be running very low on cash !
Ouch ! Its not looking good here if you go on volume and trades !
Doing well this morning on Saudi prospect.
Clearly getting rid of non core assets to RRR is doing them no harm.
Meanwhile back here DRC rumbles on and 200 tonnes sits in a warehouse somewhere.
I thought Helpful said three weeks to mobilise at FASO. He has rose tinted specs but we should according to him be a good way to mobalisation on site..
An update might inspire confidence
$2,192🔥😁🤪
$2,181. On another little charge; kept dropping back from $2,179. $2,200 in sight now.
DYOR
Or the 4 billion that Belly will surely have no problem recovering....
DRC cash Sorry
With the past record of this company I think it’s getting to the point where a couple of days as mentioned in stock box has become a couple of weeks unless of course they have left the DRC empty handed which would be my bet as I’m sure they would be screaming from the hills if they had received the cash all the talk will now go on how good the Aussie gold project is another let down And yes I am a shareholder unfortunately
It is now 12 days in the DRC starting from 14.3.24 for "Meeting" & "Meetings." A simple RRR RNS will do, as in: RRR is pleased to inform that pursuant to the "DRAFT AWARD", the agreements have been SIGNED and duly FILED to the DRC Commercial Court and a HEARING applied for by Counsel. It would be a great help to all of us here on this forum who are waiting patiently and brings some reality to those who are not holders relating to 101 procedures. In appreciation for your kind consideration. Mon, 25.3.24.
Banbury given the time AB has spent in DRC for this trip it seems apparent the 'deal' was not agreed to and it would apprear that some negotiating is going on
Can you please provide DATE, citations and verbatim?
Four months ago it was we were told so close
" Two versions of the annual report were prepared. One reflecting receipt and one not !"
Three months ago payment was just a technicality around the election..
Helpful was posting endless links before proclaiming our man won !!
The lastest nference from Mr Bell is to blame M18 rebels.
In terms of outlandish it lacks the "class" of the Lithium 200 tonnes which is outlandish and back in a Zimbabwe warehouse but nevertheless this feels desperate.