Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Who is Jimmy Bold
J
Are they your own thoughts or copied from elsewhereš¤
Nope, i will no longer post my thoughts, this board does not do any original thoughts if they contain questions, concerns or doubts. As such i am only going to reiterate others words that make only ramping statements and predictions with zero concerns or doubts. ,so SJ within 2 weeks, SV101 and drilling MOU 5 within 4 weeks, and Ā£4-5 sp by next yearā¦ all others quotes people want to hearā¦. have a great dayā¦
GRH. .. .. . .. As further evidence that Jimmy Bold is fraudulent
The entire LSE thread...
In which his fraud was exposed ... in detail
Has now been removed
BIG MONEY INVOLVED
TheBold claims to know more about drilling and rigless testing than anyone else on this board, and more than Lonny & Moyra, who together have drilled more successful wells in Morocco than everyone else put together in the whole of exploration history. I demonstrated that his knowledge is plagiarised from other sources, and that he is utterly lacking in credibility, which is why he has had the thread deleted. So, a re-post is in order:
"Today you are claiming expertise in all matters relating to drilling and testing.
Six weeks ago, on 19th March at 16.24 you asked "Hi, can you advise Whatās geology got to do with wellbore fluid invasion and reservoir damage, does that change with the geology ? Ie is it easier or harder to fix in certain rock types ?"
At 15.14 the same day you posted detailed information indicating your knowledge of perforation techniques. Out of curiosity, I copied your post and pasted it into Google. The result was this: https://petrowiki.spe.org/Perforating_methods
You have just copied direct from Petrowiki, changing a few words here and there to make it look like your own work. Hardly surprising that you continued to get things wrong throughout your 19 posts yesterday, having to amend them on multiple occasions when you were corrected by others who actually do know what they are talking about."
@thebold - I see you're quoting other sources again. Any chance of some original thought?
Just patheticā¦!
Anyway 2 weeks we will know as sandjet ops will commence within this periodā¦ sic keith oz.
"Today 01:01 KeithOz
No Opinion PRD RE: Filter"
What was the gist?
Letās see if Goldy, aka goldfish and Jimmy have any explanation for this?
Didnāt think there was anything in desperate need of removing tbh.
Never mind.
Amendment received and we look forward to the company using it šš¼
Thats because the bĀ£Ā£d one has been filtered by lse at last for being a tw.at@
Any chance of a re-post?
This bb is a farce.
ā¦ā¦. and as if by magic, the whole thread has gone šŖ
Excellent detective work Keith š
Thebold, have a read at this and then have another think about why PG used perforating first as part of the plan to then use SJ - https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2024/01/360389/predator-oil-amp-gas-to-scale-operations-in-guercif-following-positive-report
So yeah casing - after just 2/3 mins easy checking:
RNS 27 June 2023 re MOU3:
"No logs were acquired over the shallow interval, the results for which were previously announced, which are behind 95/8" casing."
"Wireline logs were run as per the pre-drill logging programme. 41/2" casing was run to the casing shoe at 1494.5 metres TVD MD. The well has been completed for rigless testing."
Wikipedia - completion (oil and gas wells)
"Perforated casing
Production casing is cemented through the zone and the pay section is selectively perforated. Gas and water are easily controlled as is sand. The formation can be selectively stimulated and the well can be deepened. This selection is adaptable to other completion configurations and logs are available to assist casing decisions. Much better primary casing. It can however cause damage to zones and needs good log interpretation. The perforating cost can be very high"
Do you know the difference between casing and tubing OCTG ?
I very much doubt we are perforating through casing, with Guns or Sandjet., because if we are there will be no gas, as it will be way outside of reservoir intervals.
The wells were completed for potential production I believe , production tubing ( ie 4ā -4.5ā) will have been run through the reservoir sections hopefullyā¦ā¦.NOT casing.
This is in reply to an e mail i sent in regards to Sandjet.
"Thanks for your email and interest in the process.Ā When we begin pumping sand slurry to the tool, the wellbore will be full or nearly full of fluid (depending on if we are using coiled tubing or jointed pipe as the work string/fluid conveyor).Ā As we pump the sand slurry through the tool to create the perforation tunnel, the bulk of the used slurry will flow to the surface and into a containment area.Ā The sand slurry consists of water, sand, and a gel used to increase sand carrying capacity of the fluid.Ā The gel allows us to more easily return the sand to the surface.Ā There will be a little sand left in the well after the perforating job, and typically the tool is run back into the well to circulate/wash out the portion that might have fallen below the tool."
End of copy/paste
In reference to the casing as questioned earlier
More copy/paste from same email
"To your second question, the sand in the sand slurry performs the cutting and perforating work.Ā We know the amount of sand required to perforate casings of different sizes, cement, and formations from 15 years of surface testing and well perforation.Ā A typical perforation tunnel will require approximately 100 pounds of sand per tunnel.Ā Unconsolidated formations may require less and more challenging environments like multiple casing strings will require more.Ā Using the 100 pound example, approximately 30 pounds of sand are required to perforate the casing, 20 pounds to perforate the cement, and the 50 pounds remaining are for creating the perforation tunnel in the formation.Ā We have been able to verify these quantities on well locations by performing injection tests to document that the wellbore has communication with the formation/reservoir.Ā
I hope that this information answers your questions.Ā Feel free to send more questions or you are welcome to give me a call."
End of copy/paste..
Can i also add that this e mail was from as far up Sandjets corporate structure as it is possible to be, straight from the horses mouth so to speak...
I purposely left off senders name, but he's a really helpful chap, and his knowledge of the product is frightening.
Gla
Taff
Bdt
The Bold
As per your statement
āI also hope we are NOT perforating through casing , because if we are something is very wrongā.
How do you think the Hydrocarbons flood into the well after perforating using conventional guns or Sand Jet Technology.
This is why Paul said in the latest presentation,
There is no need to drill another shallow well on Mou3 as the Sand Jet is so powerful it will penetrate through 2 casings, as in the thickness of the well casings at the Shallow depths .
Just for you, a little video with pictures to help you understand how perforating a well works.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=duToyzpZqos
GLA Genuine PRD investors.
Showing yourself up again here Boldy.
Your previous post shows a lack of research, understanding and listening.
Where did it state we drilled the wells intentionally over balanced ,was it over balanced or just poor well bore cleaning protocols ? If our drilling team intentionally drilled through the reservoir sections OB, then they would have known of the debris issues at the time and planned to Sandjet perforate in the basis of well design to potentially circumvent thisā¦., plan was to conventionally perforate, SJ is now our last result, before we only have a side track option. You think your smart , your not very.
And you have increased your holding to 200,000 Bold - You must be feeling positive about something - Go on please let us know what it is!
GLA
Is it me?
The issue is drilling the well overbalanced, which has forced the drilling mud into the reservoir.
Thatās on the other side of the casing by the way.
Did I read they were expecting first gas in October?
Why, I mentioned they are not all successful, which they are not, you didnāt like it and started getting personal which seems to be the āgo toā stance here if any concerns or questions are asked. Anyway enough said Keith Oz has officially called SJ commencing next 2 or so weeks, letās all wait and see the results. Fingers crossed itās all good.