PYX Resources: Achieving volume and diversification milestones. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Would you class AlignResearch as derampers then? was just looking on their website and they state that they take positions themselves in any company they produce a research note on, but they also will release notes where they will recommend something as a sell, to be fair they seem like a truly independent source, the following is from their site:
Align Research – an innovative new research house
Align's purpose is two fold - to increase awareness amongst investors of investment opportunities we perceive to have exceptional risk/reward profiles and then to completely align (hence the name) ourselves with existing investors in those companies and any new investor that acts upon our coverage. Unconflicted, completely transparent, 'eat your own cooking' research.
Our Philosophy
Within the investment landscape there are always conflicts of interest. Interests that can be at odds with each other. For example, within the research sphere, notes are typically produced by the house broker, the company’s Nomad, or are paid for (usually in cash) via so called “independent” research providers.
As industry professionals with decades of experience in the stock markets, headed up by highly qualified individuals from both fund management and analytical backgrounds, we have learnt the hard way just how each vested interest can work against the end investor’s interest.
For instance, where a note is produced by the broker to a company it is almost without exception that a “Sell” rating is never issued. In essence, parties are not going to bite the hand that feeds them. Regulation has tightened up in this area in recent years so that these inherent conflicts are disclosed. However, the universe of “tied” broker notes is generally questioned by fund managers and seasoned investors.
Similarly, traditional “paid for” research providers are remunerated almost exclusively in cash and so the end result with regards to stock price movements, post the production of the research note, is largely of little consequence to these firms. They still get paid.
It is from this background and landscape that ALIGN Research was borne. Our USP’s are thus 3 fold:
We approach only those companies that we actually BELIEVE in. We don’t take all and sundry onto our books on the basis of preparedness to pay. Belief in the investment case is our sole criteria in selection.
We actively look to take payment almost exclusively in the company’s equity or apply payment to purchasing the equity of the covered company. This of course ALIGNS us with both the company (existing shareholders and management) and new investors that act upon our research notes. If we are wrong in our analysis we suffer the same fate as the covered company's shareholders.
We also propose “Conviction Sell” recommendations on certain companies where we feel the shares are a good short opportunity and, where applicable, openly disclose our position in such a candidate.
You can see just how the Align
Let’s not forget the derampers ;-)
Day trader can you tell me why you haven’t sold out? As every angle you look from is negative, why on earth would any person leave money in a 100% guaranteed loser???
it still doesn't make sense to me what you are saying daytrader, as surely if the news was bad then the sp would have dropped 25 % yet the sp has gone up 25 % over the last 2 trading days so clearly the market sees Mondays RNS as very positive yet you seem to have interpreted it differently to the market and investors.
We are all both right and wrong. The rns yesterday was excellent news. But on the flip side nothing has actually changed. It's all a question of timing, and I'd rather be in now after that rns near year lows
Day trader if pfp wins court case in moz they will have licences restored as you in your own words said they were stolen. You do understand that don’t you that could happen. So I ask again why would the Chinese buy 50% of potentially nothing SHOULD THE COURTS IN MOZ RULE IN PFP FAVOUR.
You will not look at one think positive and with a name like day trader you are trying to back in. Otherwise Mr negative why would you hold on to theses as you are saying there is no hope.
Also a hell of alot of buyers yesterday and today.
So you're saying that everyone misinterpreted yesterdays RNS apart from yourself?
Correct Madchatter, even at 40p per share they are still getting a bargain bearing in mind they get over 1BILLION worth of assets! it's a no brainer from their point of view!!
20p a share I'm sure nobody would complain and still a bargain
I agree they don’t mess around. So why would they buy 50% of something that has already had a high court ruling in pfp’s favour. They would be stupid to gamble like that unless they buy pfp out and then the courts In Mozambique isn’t a worry for them anymore.
You're right, the Chinese are not fools and they will want our special assets asap hence a T/O approach being likely very very soon!
Give it up daytrader, I get that you are looking for a lower entry here but no need to be so transparent, you just need to be patient here and the rewards will come, if you're not convinced then best you find a different stock to invest in and leave holders here to bask in the rewards that should be on their way imminently! XX
You was pleased yesterday with the Chinese news now you are not. Don’t need to be inspector morse to see what’s going on here.
You can’t just ignore and dismiss the fact that we are awaiting a decision from the court. We are still waiting and that is a fact. Pressure has been put on at the highest level as recently as January. You can’t ignore that either. The courts could potentially rule in PFP’s favour and uphold the UK courts ruling which means the Chinese have 50% of nothing. The Chinese will have done due diligence as you say and will know the UK courts ruling and IMO will want to buy PFP out before the ruling is announced.
On 22 May 2018, the Supreme Court in Mozambique notified the Company of its request for final written submissions in relation to Pathfinder's application for recognition of the 2012 English High Court ruling in its favour. The Company complied and lodged final written submissions.
That’s what I meant in Mozambique I believe we are still waiting for a verdict after all this time.
Did cavaco sell his 50% knowing the courts will rule in pfp favour meaning he has sold 50% of nothing to the Chinese???
And if the courts rule in favour of pfp?
Daytrader
That's what I have said, the situation to me was Pathfinder Moz and Pathfinder UK held 50% equally.
Now the Chinese have purchased Covaco 50% that means PFP UK own 50% Chinese 25% and Velose 25%
Hi Logic
Just for clarity, do you agree with me that the e position was Pathfinder Mozambique has 50% and half that being the Lawyer's Vecino holding has been purchased by the Chinese, leaving Veloso with 25% and Pathfinder PLC with 50%,
After many years of ups and downs the end is now in sight for long term shareholders.
Looking back to the days of SRB it was agreed that only half the license was being negotiated. The latest news that the Chinese state company have acquired 50% of the license and that PFP are in discussions with them and funding partners over the remaining 50% hints that good news may be about to land. The Chinese state company will not want just 50% of the asset! To spell it out, we are now looking at financial close for 100% of the licence of which pfp is a key partner.
Pfp are working with the Mozambique and British governments, do not underestimate this.
Align continue to hold firm as the main shareholder giving confidence that the project is about to reach its well known potential.
I do not think align will be ramping this, there is no need. They will merely spell out the facts that the project is now in the best position it has ever been in to close out a fantastic deal for shareholders, IMO,GLA!