We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I do wonder how long it will take for Ai models to work in such a way that it will catch those bad actors who intentionally spread negative rumours and trash talk stocks in order to manipulate prices down,whether they be bad actors working their own position or being paid a fee to do so.
you could imagine that penalties will be quite severe.
Stas20, if you are to persist with the placing line of attack it would more effective if you use the correct number required for initial CAPEX sink. Most PANR shareholders know that the number is ~$150M due to the multiple webinars we have watched were these numbers have been openly discussed.
Please also be aware that given the sheer size of the resources, many people won't be fazed by the dilution threats. Indeed Jay Cheatham has openly discussed worst case scenario's in past webinars also.
It would be good to get some balance on this board but you need to up your game if you are going to provide it.
Oh my sides, .....
seems simmering scot doesn't like the reality here, maybe I'll remind him later, but unlike yourself and your buddy OlderWiser, I shall only remind you of the dilution once for each 20 million of shares that are raised.
On that basis simmering, I should only have to remind you around 40-50 times, lol about 1/10th the combined number of posts you simmering and your buddy Older has placed on the 88e board in the last 30 days.
Enjoy the 944 million shares here, soon to be doubled.
10:44
Here's another silly fellow. Silly Stas has trouble reading, listening and understanding. Silly Stas thinks the $250m he heard about in the webinar was the *required* amount to move PANR to FID and a self-financing Ahpun development. Silly Stas, despite it being explained to him in detail yesterday, doesn't realise that *If* the Alaska gas pipeline goes ahead, $250m would be the approx size of the facility the SoA/AGDC/utilicos would guarantee/arrange for PANR to draw on to move its project forward. Silly Stas doesn't understand the difference between "modelled amount required for FID" and "size of bank facility made available to PANR *If* the gas pipeline gets the go ahead". What a silly Stas.
Silly Stas then compounds his error by using the $250m figure to dream up some fantasy corporate activity. Silly Stas has forgotten all about the vendor finance negotiations with a "large" OFS firm, where the OFS firm is waiting for the 2x IERs on Ahpun due imminently. Silly Stas also thinks he knows more than the Governor of Alaska about the proposed gas pipeline deal. Silly Stas has ignored entirely the terms of the recent agreement between PANR and the AGDC which described a gas deal which, *if* the gas pipeline goes ahead, would see revenue to PANR from gas sales alone of $500k per day.
Silly Stas is lashing out because he's angry. Silly Stas would be better using his time to work out if, after 88E pays for this winter's operations at Hickory-1, whether 88E will be insolvent. Silly Stas publicly posts that 88E's troubles are down to evil PANR shareholders when, in his heart, he fears it's because he didn't do enough research on the geology of Project Phoenix despite being urged to do so for years.
Silly Stas is being silly and isn't taking responsibility for his decision to invest in a listed company. Don't be like silly Stas.
You just confirmed the exact point II said about rumors and conjecture...thanks!
"All the shorts fill the boards with false dilution rumors"
there is nothing false about the levels of dilution that are coming here, anything up to approx. 1 billion shares additional which would be a $250m raise with the 100 million bond shares. That is only taking into account a 10% discount to the prevailing SP, if others are to be believed (20-40% discount) then the dilution here will be fierce, personally I do not see that percentage discount unless some left field event.
No doubt at all though imo dilution is coming, the only question is the level of that dilution.
1) Positive announcement SP goes up
2) All the shorts fill the boards with false dilution rumors
3) Market makers and shorts walk the price down until the next announcement...go back to point 1) rinse repeat
However what we're getting now is lower lows and higher highs so watch this space.