London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Started: Castlepaul13, 6 Jan 2026 09:36
Last post: Castlepaul13, 6 Jan 2026
Link does not work
22 September 2025
Nano approach to plant feed will improve crop productivity, farm profitability and sustainability
Cutting-edge nanotechnology will drive a new generation of fertilisers aimed at addressing UK food security by improving the nutritional value, performance and health of crops and plants.
By Dave Rogers | Published on 22 September 2025
Categories: Press office; Research; School of Science and Technology;
Scientists at Nottingham Trent University are working with the company Micromix Plant Health as part of the three-year knowledge transfer partnership, being funded by Innovate UK.
It will involve incorporating nanotechnology-enhanced formulations to plant feed, allowing targeted and increased absorption of essential nutrients directly into plant roots and through the leaves.
This ‘precision agriculture’ approach is expected to result in increased yields, reduced harvest times, and prevent against pests, as well as reducing reliance on imported chemicals often used in less effective traditional fertilisers.
The work will involve embedding advanced nanotechnology expertise initially developed at Nottingham Trent University for the pharmaceutical industry into commercially viable plant feed and will benefit UK commercial agriculture and horticulture sectors.
It is thought to be the first time commercially accessible plant biostimulant has been produced using bespoke nanotechnology that has the capacity to correct trace mineral deficiencies as a way of improving both crop productivity and nutrition.
The project will also address two major environmental challenges in modern agriculture by minimising fertiliser waste and reducing environmental runoff containing possible pollutants.
In turn this will also help improve the farmers’ profitability with a reduced cost of treatment to achieve the yield increases required to maintain commercial viability.
Nano-minerals will be synthesized and new fortified plant feed will be formulated in both powder and liquid form before a series of plant performance trials across the UK.
Micromix Plant Health Ltd
“This work will tackle general inefficiencies inherent in traditional fertilisers and will benefit both farmers and gardeners,” said principal investigator Gareth Cave, Professor in Advanced nanotechnology and sustainable chemistry in Nottingham Trent University’s School of Science and Technology.
He said: “Our technology can help drive agricultural productivity and resilience by accelerating crop growth and yield, strengthening plant defences against environmental pressures, and reducing vulnerability to pests.
“This precision-targeted approach to nutrient delivery will ensure controlled release directly to plant roots, optimising absorption while preventing excess leaching into ecosystems.
“The result is healthier soil, reduced environmental impact and a shift towards more sustainable farming practices.”
Https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.ntu.ac.uk/about-us/news/news-articles/2025/09/nano-approach-to-plant-feed-will-improve-crop-productivity,-farm-profitability-and-sustainability&ved=2ahUKEwiuxZmMz_aRAxVuSEEAHUHJGGkQFnoECCIQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1j3wP52FzRolk8zGxkKgXZ
This work will tackle general inefficiencies inherent in traditional fertilisers and will benefit both farmers and gardeners,” said principal investigator Gareth Cave, Professor in Advanced nanotechnology and sustainable chemistry in Nottingham Trent University’s School of Science and Technology.
He said: “Our technology can help drive agricultural productivity and resilience by accelerating crop growth and yield, strengthening plant defences against environmental pressures, and reducing vulnerability to pests.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.ntu.ac.uk/about-us/news/news-articles/2025/09/nano-approach-to-plant-feed-will-improve-crop-productivity,-farm-profitability-and-sustainability&ved=2ahUKEwiE04quzvaRAxXHQkEAHVsDHWAQFnoECBsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1j3wP52FzRolk8zGxkKgXZ
Started: SteamyWee, 31 Mar 2025 15:48
Last post: Willcocks20, 22 Apr 2025
Cheers Steamy. I'm decluttering my portfolio and see NNN has been removed.
Win some, lose some. Mostly lose on AIM haha
Just heard from A J Bell. This is what the message contains:
"Further to our previous communication, we have received an update regarding Nanosynth Group Plc Liquidation event.
Antony Batty & Company LLP have confirmed that following the liquidation, there is no possibility of a return to shareholders.
As such, your shares in Nanosynth Group Plc have now been declared as worthless and will be removed from your account in due course."
Started: Beardolian, 10 Oct 2024 12:59
Last post: ReggieT, 21 Jan 2025
Only skimmed but some interesting lines in there. Most importantly further investigation into creditors concerns and update in approx 6 months.
Theres an Administrators Progress Report filing on Companies House, dated 20th January 25. Currently not available to view at the time of writing this though. Might get some info about whats happening once the filing is published.
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09109008/filing-history
I personally find it strange that the company is still not wiped out since being suspended for over a year.
I have no idea. But nothing to lose by hoping ...as there the share is still visible in my portfolio, there is hope.
Here's hoping for a miracle.
Ritz
Is this share now dead or can a miracle happen and it comes out of suspension. 🤞🙏
If you do actually email Sharan@antonybatty.com ask her to investigate the quantum of monies paid to Debello Law Limited. Literally a one man band law firm who's current assets increased by £1.3M from May 2021 to May 2022. Meanwhile NNN was shedding cash like it was going out of fashion. Also ask her to investigate if the sole director and employee of Debello Law Dean Dunham band had a prior relationship with Mark Duffin.
I hopes everyone will writes to Sharan@antonybatty.com and tells them what to look for about these guys who spend maybe 5m pounds , the directors to be investigated by them are listed in his documents including Gareth Cave, Peter James Gray, Richard Clarke, Mark Duffin, Antony Legge and Andrew Stedman. Cave is still in a few PLCs and so is Antony Legge. Richard CLARKE is a director of AVIMO PENSION TRUSTEES LIMITED Company number 07863358
tuan6 is usually good at pointing them out fish
Callit,
I hope they do a better job than the FCA, as they have not even acknowledged my last 2 communications regarding NNN, which supplied an abundance of evidence, such as misleading RNS's and other statements put out by NNN.
Several years ago, I had a similar experience involving the FCA with another company misleading shareholders.
In that instance, communication was good and they explained what actions they intended to take.
Probably there are so many of the FCA staff working (sic) from home, they just ignore communications at will.
@Rooky I hope that anyone looking into the company will see my post and start to question what has gone on here on behalf of unpaid creditors and shareholders.
It s so galling to see that the people responsible for running the company are still due payouts while others lose their money.
A lot of questions there Calli.
I think the answer to most of them is, the simple explanation that points to one big Con.
Why are there no audited accounts? !!!
£0.5m from the warrants deal. Where is it?
https://markets.ft.com/data/announce/detail?dockey=1323-15322786-23G3GB9LINNI28F18IG9N1CIA9
If it was spent then is there approx £0.5m of equipment in the Volz factory that belongs to NNN?
If it was not spent, can it be recovered?
With an extra approx £0.5m could the company continue as a going concern or cash shell?
If it was not spent and the production line not upgraded why did the company RNS that the filters product would be launched at the event in Cologne?
https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/NNN/corporate-and-commercial-update-nt0vfcres4ihyat.html
Was the filters product launched at the event?
It appears not, but social media after the event was all positive about the event and no mention of this critical deviation from what shareholders had been told by RNS would happen.
If the filters were not launched how would this affect the projected cash flow forecast?
Was there a substantial element to come from the sale of filters that would now not be expected to arrive?
Would it be known at the stage that the filters were not launched that there would be a hole in the finances?
Why was something not done to conserve cash earlier if this was the case?
Is he the NED who oversaw the demise after they took in 5m quid, where did the money go? Richard maybe you can tell u and the administrator, tank took for spells check
Started: dcode, 25 Aug 2024 20:44
Last post: dcode, 25 Aug 2024
Antony legge or Anthony btw does he spell his name many ways like Anthony etc?
Gareth cave at NTU https://www.ntu.ac.uk/staff-profiles/science-technology/gareth-cave
Started: SteamyWee, 22 Aug 2024 08:04
Last post: wwal17, 22 Aug 2024
Https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/oov8gAzX-4m3RC_Vev36l8fgkUM/appointments
Avoid this car crash of a director.
I just hope the statutory authorities do their job, and any hint of misconduct is properly dealt with. But as this is the AIM wild west, I doubt it.
Company play this game from start as they got nothing but public misled rns all thing good and promise return quick. All of this turn out false . Before they set up this company they have form 7 other companys with the same pumped rns end change company name. this one the last one they cleared it off and they will form new company againt with new name.
Dont be trapped in and give your money to crocks as they only look after your money. as I have tracked down this company and bought its share before Covid and I know how this company will play out it game. now this is end game for all share holders.
Iv read it secured creditors will be paid and preferential creditors .
Surplus money might be able to pay share holders
No mention in the formality of closure , some one might take it on + they are looking into hoings on by directors etc ...
More news to come as the liquidator has not finished .
So according to the report, Winding up the company, looks the best option, so as a distribution will not be made to unsecured creditors., it looks like all shares held will be as expected, worthless, (see my last sentence.)
It does though, look like they are investigation pre administration disposal of assets, expenses claimed.
A very in depth report, but hopefully the section re possible dividends to unsecured creditors (not sure if that includes shareholders, perhaps someone with better knowledge can clarify) will see us getting something.
Started: Castlepaul13, 31 May 2024 07:22
Last post: Ritz_89, 21 Aug 2024
New doc filed on companies house.
Let's see what it is when PDF shortly becomes available.
Ritz
Does anyone know what's happening with NNN and if it will rise like a phoenix from the flames? Or is it permanently dead?
Maybe this was NNN's 15% they sold to BRH?
Https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/BRH/investment-update-8211-gyrometric-5kgu0zzh191c5qa.html
NNN still own some Gyrometric I believe. Things happening there again by there looks of it. BRH involved again.
Does this help us? I don't know, but it's interesting.
August tomorrow
In 2 months this would be 1 year of suspension.
I still believe all is not lost is here. Too much time has passed...something is going on in the background for sure.
Just wish there was a way we can get some insight into whats going on.
Ritz
Like most, I have written off my investment, but if anything is salvaged that will be a bonus.
I am not living in hope though.
That's my take on it too. If you look at the filing notice for the other companies it does not mention 'cause has been shown ..etc etc '
So what is going on at nanosynth. What cause has been shown as evidence for why the company should stay on?
Agree - getting hopes up now is not wise. Never the less with the shares still there and no plans for striking off who knows what is going on.
If there was a turnaround ...then wow.
Ritz
Sorry - haven't been here for ages and didn't realise there were so many messages re the strike off below!
Looks like the subsidiary, Virosynth Ltd, (I think partly owned by NNN and Volz) was on the way to strike off, then this was suspended, and then final the company was struck off. The difference for NNN - it appears - is that the strike-off has been completely discontinued...
I wouldn't get any hopes up, but it would be quite something if there was a turnaround.
Agree.
The specific line about 'cause has been shown for why the company should not be struck off' is interesting.
Shares are still there on my portfolio.
Who knows I guess ?
Ritz
Started: Castlepaul13, 27 Apr 2024 10:50
Last post: Castlepaul13, 1 May 2024
Ha ha. Ex you will never change , how's your brother Ug .
Who knows? Well clearly not you Castle. Bless…..
The last accounts on companies house for P2F are for year ending 2022... a lots happened since then. Fairly certain that £3M is no longer there.
Shambles Street is just the registered address, their are loads of firms registered there. It's not a P2F office as such.
Companies house still alive and trading .
With Total net Assets of sky of 3 mill but owing parent company 3 mill , worth saving pharm2farm,, Director Cave ,, next books 2024 ,, moved offices recently.. so liquidators are on the ball , maybe nanosynth goes virosynth and pharm2farm stays ,,, who knows !!
I would think that there are many directions our money has gone, almost 100% down a black hole where it is being or has been hived off. The problem is that the FCA are either totally incompetent, don't give a dam about shareholders, or both, as proven my them totally ignoring 2 direct official complaints from myself, without even an acknowledgment.
Just wondering but in the RNS:
https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/NNN/update-on-jv-agreement-with-volz-mh3o2jf55i2fqf2.html
"
The cost of converting the Volz production line is considerable. It has therefore been agreed that to save nanosynth having to inject cash into Virosynth to meet half the cost of this, it will instead provide a warrant over ordinary shares in the Company to the shareholders of Volz, namely; Rainer Volz and Jonathan Thornton.
Accordingly, the Company has issued £500,000 of warrants over 50,000,000 shares at an exercise price of 1 pence each (a premium of c.29% to the closing mid market share price on 9 February 2022) to be granted equally to Rainer Volz and Jonathan Thornton ("Warrants"). The Warrants are exercisable for a period of three years from the date of grant and only upon completion of the conversion of the product line."
So the 500k we paid them is 50% of the cost of the work to meet NNN's half and they must meet the other half.
So approx 1m of upgrades to Volz machinery 50% paid by us.
As far as I can tell It has not been RNS'd if this work has or has not been completed, either way isn't there 500k (possibly minus depreciation) of our money tied up in Volz factory or their bank accounts?
Do we have any claim on getting this back?
Started: Castlepaul13, 17 Apr 2024 08:17
Last post: ExMS, 19 Apr 2024
Seems the bigger boat ended up Shambles Street, without a paddle 😂😂😂
Shambles Street!
The gift that keeps on giving😂😂😂😂
Gareth Cave
PHARM 2 FARM LIMITED
15/02/2024 changed address
Registered office address changed from 27-28 Eastcastle Street London W1W 8DH United Kingdom to Old Linen Court Shambles Street Barnsley S70 2SB on 15 February 2024
It would seem Gareth still keeps it afloat .
Castle
Started: Oocanibe, 11 Apr 2024 11:00
Last post: Oocanibe, 11 Apr 2024
Sorry, wrong board :(
Started: Oocanibe, 11 Apr 2024 10:57
Last post: Oocanibe, 11 Apr 2024
My shares have now appeared under Argent BioPharma & are now worth a couple of quid! Not sure what's going on but better than losing my whole investment here!
Started: Ritz_89, 25 Mar 2024 16:29
Last post: TheSyrup, 10 Apr 2024
Final nail in the coffin for NNN, first gazette compulsory strike off notice listed on companies house now.
I spent 6 months turning up daily here to demonstrate why this company was going to fail, I watched how the rampy BS merchants vanished as the ship went down.
I should have added..I will check back here for any questions..but ultimately dyor please first.
guys i don't cross ramp read as many of my postings as you want.
i lost a few hundred here on a punt.
look at my main holding ( the clue is in my postings!)
there are many posters on there far more knowledgeable than me.
check out allenby capital research notes.
dyor ...but i reckon it might be worth a punt.. don't want to get a kicking here just think it's an opportunity .
i hate the ****e that went on here and bidstack ( i got out of bidstack)..best intentions.
dyor ...thats it..
Good post deckchair66,
There is/was a group of NNN shareholders that were looking to go down this route, but as only having a very small number of NNN shares, I did not want to risk throwing good money, after bad. I think, they were looking at a few hundred quid to join the group
Hopefully, this group did get enough investors to sign up, and any future court action is successful.
One of the best lessons, regarding the behavior of board members is, if the company is on AIM, they can probably get away with almost anything.
As for the FCA, they are as a watchdog, as useful as a Rottweiler with no teeth.
Started: Castlepaul13, 18 Mar 2024 08:26
Last post: Castlepaul13, 18 Mar 2024
Hope so with these big losses we have .
News I expect
Castle
Started: BertieBassett, 11 Mar 2024 09:25
Last post: BertieBassett, 11 Mar 2024
Dear All,
Meanwhile, over at IQAI, we seem to have a problem with the BoD. The problem seems to be one that you had.
I have now had interesting conversations with fellow "whistleblowers" re: the IQAI problem.
Thankfully, IQAI is "main market" and therefore more accountable ... and the SEC (USA) in particular is more prone to investigate any claims due to this. IQAI has USA-based BoDs.
Just to note, I am not a sizeable investor in IQAI, I just don't like to be treated with disrespect ...
Is there anyone here who has the time/inclination to chat through your RMS/NNN problems with me?
Please email me: iqaicomplaints@gmail.com
-- BB --
Started: cfo82, 13 Feb 2024 14:01
Last post: Prime, 5 Mar 2024
Mild humour: I have just seen that even Aldi have a copper infused product, a pillow !!!
Luckybob23,
I know the tech re copper worked thousands of years ago, but it was the advancement into its use in masks as micro particles that was the innovation.
You can't equate the NNN tech with such as copper used as they did 1000's of years ago.
I stand by my post of 13th.
"Somewhere along the line, there has to be fraudulent behavior.
Take the Covid mask saga alone. If the copper tec part of the mask worked, and part of that tec worked in air filters as stated in at least 1 RNS, then there has to be some value in the patent or/and the IP.
If the tec did not work, then surely that has to a case of fraud on a stand alone basis, due to what the company promised in it's adverts, regarding the protection given by the Covid Masks.
No one, especially the FCA appear to be interested."
Rooky, the tech worked, it dates back 1000s of years.
The only fraud committed here was by lying rampers who flooded this board and every other board during covid, dragging anyone in they could so they could ten bag on a trade.
The country was desperate for solutions , it was a great idea but as soon a vaccines came out the concept was too expensive to implement and sell , it was no longer a viable business. They tried to get production going , They tried to expand into other niche markets to make it viable but ultimately it was a novelty and the interest wasn't there.
Before anyone comes at me with "we're gonna need a bigger boat"
It was an off the cuff remark based on his much interest was shown pre vaccine, perpetuated by ramping day traders who sold up as soon as they could see it was going down. Probably them sending continuous fake emails expressing interest in ordering the product to cave in the first place.
That's the reality
Somewhere along the line, there has to be fraudulent behavior.
Take the Covid mask saga alone. If the copper tec part of the mask worked, and part of that tec worked in air filters as stated in at least 1 RNS, then there has to be some value in the patent or/and the IP.
If the tec did not work, then surely that has to a case of fraud on a stand alone basis, due to what the company promised in it's adverts, regarding the protection given by the Covid Masks.
No one, especially the FCA appear to be interested.
Correction: just saw an email from T212 saying the delisting was now complete. Worst "trade" of my life by far...
BRH seem to be due a windfall too with the Proposed sale of Phasefocus.
Didn't TB have links to Barnsley?
Coincidence?
It says the Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship is based there....maybe why so many small companies are listed
Started: takethisadvice, 15 Feb 2024 15:14
Last post: TheSyrup, 15 Feb 2024
Old Linen Court
83-85 Shambles St
Barnsley
S70 2SB
Shambles Street lol, you couldn't make it up. Loads of firms are using that address as well.
Companies house has changed all of Dr Caves Companies address today.
It would be good if Dr cave was able to help share holders to get some of our money back.🤞
Yes I agree, very strange to be able to post here , it's still alive but not kicking, Dr cave what's going on ?
Castle
Complete radio silence from them…
The company, as per Companies House still shows as active.
Company status
Active
Still has 4 Officers active ( what the hell are they doing).
Still nothing received from my official complaint to the FCA.
From previous contact, I know it's not worth chasing up, as last time I did so, I was ignored.
And they wonder why confidence in the LSE by private investors, is almost none existent.
Selected partners may offer promotions for new customers. We may earn a referral fee if you open an account
Follow the stocks
that matter to you
Create a free LSE account to:
Already a member? Log in
Create Free Account

