Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Regards custard,
I quote ' A detestable substance produced by a malevolent conspiracy of the hen, the cow and the cook '.
BoL
Hi T,
Tarts were all snatched back by the baker, Tim Cook, but at least he left us with a free oven.
Hi BBD,
Where are the 'tarts' ?
You can grow several trees with lots of branches laden with apples from the pips.
Prefer the sweet ones to the sour, bitter ones.
BoL
In fact, we peeled off Apple as the likely client right here on this board, shortly after the deal's announcement, certainly long before the plodding laggards at the old-media Torygraph. Sadly, Apple crumbled, the tarts, leaving Nano in the custard, giving us all the pip.
I think anyone interested in Nanoco had seen that story.
Found it, I guess this was reported here already?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/06/23/apple-scraps-17m-contract-british-tech-firm-advanced-camera/
Did anyone see this or the original Telegraph report?
https://www.prolificnorth.co.uk/news/technology-news/2019/06/manchesters-nanoco-loses-three-quarters-its-value-after-apple
Now it turns out that the client was Apple, according to the Daily Telegraph. The US behemoth reportedly abandoned work on a next-generation camera in its iPhones.
Exit Nanonano, wearing a raincoat despite the Heatwave, smoking a cheap cigar...
Your guess would be as good as mine.
Fair enough but I thought that was more or less a given.
Could it be that samples are sent to many companies or is this seen to be exclusive.
Just one more thing.....
it isn't much i grant you, but it is, I think, the only evidence we've seen that Nanoco are working with Apple at all.
This is like an episode of Colombo.
Thought these were only a few piddling samples sent to Apple for research purposes.
I've magnified the logo and batch numbers
https://ibb.co/n1XXPwC
https://ibb.co/nmBtXJ2
Maximum resolution of image from the pdf-
https://ibb.co/DVyrScS
Colleagues: very pleasing to read of the progress being made with regard to the Trade Mark. I assume, this will be recognised world wide ? Now that the image is in the public domain would it be possible to see an enlargment of it. ? You may recall I am registered blind (since Feb 2012) with a little sight in one eye only, hence the length of time it takes me to type and check my posts. ----- Yours, Max.
Do they show batch numbers on export records? Might be a way to tie them up to get a firm timeline. Then again; it could just be a sample.
On the picture it had batch number(s) 1909002 and 1909004. Bearing in the mind the timeline, I wondered if the first halves of thos numbers referred to the date the batch was cooked up - 19/09, 19th September. Could be totally wrong though.
That certainly makes it more interesting then. Couldn’t see any shipment dates on the box so could be an old photo though?
Image was taken 20th Sept, filed on 7th October as part of the statement of first use following the granting of the trademark in May.
Hard to work out if the image was taken before or after the contract was cancelled. Clicking through the drop down to 12. I got this doc published May 1st: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn88274674&docId=SPE20191008143508#docIndex=11&page=1
Surely this is the old/ cancelled nano particles and Nanoco are just trying to tie up the trade mark. Presumably the heat name is something to do with the IR nature of the particles?
Cat's out of the bag anyway, as we know who it was to, and that ti confirms Apple are still active with the company, albeit on a reduced scale for the time being.
"On October 7, 2019 Applicant filed a Statement of Use containing a specimen that should have been partially redacted as it contains confidential information. We hereby request that the enclosed redacted version of the same specimen be considered for acceptance"
http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn88274674&docId=PDR20191106192624#docIndex=0&page=1
I think that may have something to do with a next generation iwatch, with health monitor sensors, going by the background of the person it was sent to. Probably just early days however, and the project could get canned like the QD camera did for the iphone.
Photo has been edited on the link now - guess there is still some sensitivity about the new Nanoco Heatwave product being formally linked with Apple:
http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn88274674&docId=SPE20191008143508#docIndex=4&page=1