London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
"They'd" like nothing better if this shakedown of retail investors clears some of us out of their hair. The shorting continues. Why would retail investors be selling at these levels in a manner (i.e. sufficient volume) that drives the SP down further? It seems somewhat suspicious to me.
Still no news on the corrupted investor roadshow presentation. Were the slides on powerpoint corrupted as well? Read into that what you will.
Unfortunately I didn't get to see the Investor Roadshow and kicking myself now that i didn't.
I know what Infa have said on why the roadshow was withdrawn from viewing, but what are the theories on why it was withdrawn ?
Has JW or AR give more info or hinted on something than they maybe shouldn't have ? Maybe it's info a customer is not happy with, maybe something that might give commercial advantage to competitors, maybe something that wasn't factually as accurate as it could have been, maybe something they're still working on but haven't yet closed, maybe info on MOD work that Boris is happy with ?
Sorry with all my above 'maybes', but what's the 'word on the street' in investor circles on it ?
Also. . . . Can i do a shout out to Lottie plz ? What's your thoughts on this being shorted and the possible outcomes if it is being majorly shorted ? Tia Lotts for anything you can share with us from your markets experience.
ThisTimeNextYeer In relation to your 12.32 post I am inclined to the view that the slide that showed business opportunities over the next 18 months is one of the slides they did not want to put in the public domain. Also they were a bit more forthcoming in answering questions submitted in advance than was possibly wise.
SP is becoming too good to be true for long. Have just added a few.
I remember you saying something similar a while back. It bugged me at the time but I kept quiet. Just looked it up.
From 6th May, " I hope he hasn’t got all his eyes on those new women he appointed."
I think you might be the one with the problem Cap not JW.
Jeeze, can't believe that 4 individuals ticked this misogynistic carp up.
Si(gh)
Sorry, that was aimed at Capdevila11, not you capex.
Looks like it's been removed anyway. Good.
Si_Derman In relation to your 15.38 post he has form for making offensive posts. On two occasions he had a shot at me for my tendency to start posts in relation to. He did apologise afterwards I think because other posters had a go at him.