London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I hold 3m shares. I am thinking of increasing that to 5m. Is that a silly thing to do?
2p would give me £100k, obviously
Is 2p achievable before end 2018?
I love the liquidity with this stock. You can buy and sell in decent size and with the stock underpinned by a solid company, great management with real skin in the game and a sector soon to be in demand I am struggling to see the downside
Maybe a placing? Though a placing for the right reason is never a bad thing
Apologies but just musing
The majority of the net proceeds of the Placing will be utilised to provide the funding required to enable the Company to commence and complete the Front End Engineering Design ("FEED") for the Project, which the Board considers to be a key step towards obtaining funding for construction of the Project and its commercialisation.
Â
§ Taking into account the remaining net proceeds of the Placing and current cash reserves, the Company is satisfied that it has sufficient working capital until the end of 2018.
http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=INFA&ArticleCode=8l1khfgg&ArticleHeadline=Strategic_fundraiseproject_updateJoint_Broker
Yes, thanks spud.
I am encouraged by recent appointments and significant stock purchases by Directors rather than free-lunch options..that personal financial commitment goes a long way to cementing confidence
I might err on the side of caution and add a few more when the price temporarily retraces which it will at some point
thanks
I don't think increasing your holding to 5M as long as your happy to would be a silly thing at all here....it's fair to say the project languished for years under the previous bod for a number of reasons. However the make up of the current bod with some impressive experienced individuals, commencement of FEED, recent contractor announcements with big names (Costain, DEEP Kbb, WSP) show the appetite and sheer drive to deliver and deliver they will. Another vote of confidence here and a huge buy signal for me is John Wood who became a NED recently with circa 15M shares, then last week purchased another 16M shares which now makes him a major shareholder with a similar holding to myself. That speaks volumes to me about the prospects of success for project Infa. If you dig a little deeper into the profiles of Arun Raman who joined us last week along with GL, MB, JW and AD you will understand why the market is starting to believe. We have the hallmarks of a very successful profitable company here and the next few announcements here are likely to be transformational for the company. I know of numerous shareholders here holding serious amounts who are holding long term for potentially massive gains so, with all due respect to Dinerios who is clearly a trader - no one cares about your SP predictions come Mon! By next month I see this at 1.5p and by Q1 2019 3p and this is not ramping, it's simply a realistic target bearing in mind the sheer valuation gap that exists here as we move towards construction.
mcadder - many thanks for that intoxicating contribution!
What mcadder said lol
Great post again!
Either one or two investors thought it was a good idea to put buy orders in for over 8mill shares yesterday. Definitely not 10% traders that's for sure
Very much agreed Spud - schlemiel glad to help lol
good posts guys. I notice volume is arriving in terms of number of daily trades and also value of the trades too. That bodes well particularly as the mcap is so small.
I can see a continuance of the upward trend towards the 1.5p mark next month. Based on how far they have come I'm not sure how anyone can argue that the market cap should be half of what they have spent on the project. Market is catching on and I'm pretty sure we will all be rewarded here. No dilutive funding announcement or any sniff of that and I suspect 3p will be hit. We will see. Future event and all that. gl
John Wood is COO - executive director, full time employed not a non-Executive director.
Eyeguy - lots of good things to talk about and I think 1.5p is pretty much nailed on here - volumes this week are good sign of confidence with investor's in this project and I certainly expect this to continue. As for those large 8M trades yesterday which were definitely buys would be nice to see on Mon if they are linked to further director buys? Interesting times....
agree mcadder. Funding news should rerate this to muliples. Market is now taking notice. It certainly has my full attention and even though I've bagged already on paper, I will be adding.
One thing that puzzles me is the closure of Rough which I guess is now being run down. As there appears to be such a compelling case for and shortage of gas storage I would have thought a major reappraisal there would be on the cards to overcome safety concerns and keep Rough operational. It may be the case that ongoing viability is not feasible regardless of cost, anybody know the answer?
Drums beat louder for gas security inquiry
https://theenergyst.com/drums-beat-louder-gas-security-inquiry
Rough closure was down to end of shelf life, it had operated for 32 years and it was no longer safe and economical to operate without complete refurbishment....
This simply shows the challenges INfA has overcome to get this far in its journey and the importance of the islandmagee site
https://www.ft.com/content/564a1ec0-8288-11e7-a4ce-15b2513cb3ff
I believe the whole integrity of the well is an issue with Rough, also an off shore facility operating costs will be many times that of an onshore facility.
Medium range storage (MRS) is also much more flexible, faster injection and withdrawal rates, allowing for several cycles a year. Which means more income.
As stated by infa, islandmagee could be the most profitable gas storage facility in the UK
Simple jfk9 - Rough would cost circa £1.2B just to refurb wheras Infa being MRS could be developed from scratch and have a brand new facility that is far more responsive to meeting demand and be able to supply 25% of UK's gas storage needs for just £300M. MRS sites are the way forward Rough has not only outlived it's natural life but it's usefulness too. Even though Infa sizewise is only 1/6th the size of Rough it's potentially much more profitable than long range facilities. I would argue that even if Rough remained operational the need for Infa would still have been there due to it's unique location and there being no storage in Ireland. Even when Infa is built there will still be a shortage of storage in the UK. It was never the case of one or the other but Infa would clearly provide much more value for money and be of more use as an operational facility.
I agree re Spuds post too - and no doubt in my mind construction of Infa could start as early as Q2 2019
The other issue too is even if Rough was refurbished if lucky they would get another 20yrs operational life out of it wheras the projected lifespan of Infa has been revised from 20yrs to 40yrs plus - similar to that of Hornsea which was built in 1979 and nearly at the end of it's life.
Thanks Mcadder, I was rather hoping that might be the case which assuming you are correct rules out Rough.
https://utilityweek.co.uk/centrica-to-close-rough-gas-storage-facility/
Permanently shut