London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I have just come across this story https://www.larnetimes.co.uk/news/environment/linda-hits-waves-support-no-gas-caverns-campaign-2966045 looks like the local opposition are getting ready for a legal fight. Unless the Northern Ireland Courts are less log jammed than there England counterpart any legal dispute will go on possibly for years with appeals. Infa may want to start looking seriously at a Private Act of Parliament.
Speedy_Gonzalez In relation to your 20.59 post I was aware that any challenge would have to be by way ofa JR application. My point was that the state of the court lists is that even a totally without merit application can cause significant delay while the court processes it.
whatamess In relation to your 08.03 post you have obviously never heard of an interim injunction which effetively says just that.
whatamess In relation to your 08.03 post you have clearly never heard of an interim injunction which says just that.
whatamess In relation to your 10.41 post I am not spouting nonsense I used to work in a public law team so I do know what I am talking about. On a judical review application the court can make an interim remedy order to ensure the proceedings are not made devoid of any point as a result of the decision being carried out while the proceedings are going on.
Blimey! no decision yet and we are already fighting an appeal LOL.
LOL. A bit like taking penalties before kick-off! ??
Haha dont worry whatamess, you will see your 60p one day....when it consolidates again lol. No wonder you are desperately rubbishing other peoples views.
The bod have spunked so much money up the wall it puts a Soho alley to shame. 15p target...
Hahaha lost a ton of cash in banks and iag? Really whatamess? Now who is telling fibbies. I have been extremely sucessful in almost every trade I have made over on lloy, barc, iag and many other ftse250s. £30k banked in june on IAG alone. More than you could achieve in your wildest dreams. This last 6 months has been a record breaker for me personally. hahaha....thanks to you bud my buy indicator.
You go around several boards spouting utter crap making ridiculous claims and predictions, making fake accounts bombarding thses boards with your bile. It is not just iag but several others dispite being proven wrong so many times. That's my beef with you. Perhaps if your INFA buddy speedy could keep you on a leash....
According to whatamess, he only has £5k invested here anyway....even though he told you guys he had 120k shares (consolidation adjusted) which is about £45k. OUCH! So which one is it whatamess? This prat is an A* cretin. Not a word this twit says is to be trusted....and in fact if you do the opposite you are more likely to make money like I have done in barclays, Lloyd's and iag several times eh whatamess ;)
Looks like someone is getting tetchy with a taste of his own medicine. Not too fond of crap on your own doorstep by the sounds of it! It goes without saying you consider your cash lost haha that's because it already is. Never mind, 2nd consolidation around the corner as shipyards have been fooked since 2014. 15p target for starters....but maybe lower. When has a company that has consolidated ever gone up lol. More confetti for the 15p party will be issued anytime soon by the incompetent directors, not forgetting the appledore tranches that need to be paid for yours truly, a knee jerk purchase made on the back of politicians who are knee jerk by nature and flip flop by choice. Looks like the govt have played a blinder like they did with tata steel to get some poor private sector suckers to take up a project that was barely profitable when it was not derelict. Dilution after dilution whilst asset value dwindles due to shipbuilding activity on the decline due to covid, cost cutting and flip flopping politicians....how many more millions to bring appledore into service? toxic combination.
triumph1 - In relation to your 10.58 ost in as far as it is disputing the viability of INFA I would disagree with your assessment. While you are right that the effect of Covid is to cause a downturn in the ferry industry that is not the only area that H&W are working in the ship repair business is still working. Indeed independently verified reports show that for the last couple of months the shipyard has always had ferries in for maintenance. Going into winter the ferry mantenance work is likely to increase. From my research I am comfortable with my investment in INFA. I am of the view that the broker assessment that by May 2022 INFA would have £17m net cash will turn up to be an underestimate.