Blencowe Resources: Aspiring to become one of the largest graphite producers in the world. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
It's good that AT actually replied.
It's been 3 months of emails without any reply. The last reply was back in June.
On 2 July, in this post, repeated for comparison/context with whatever is sent out by 30th Sept :
.."AT called a little earlier today, the Nomad having forwarded to him my email to them.
He stated their view that there was no regulatory obligation to update but recognised the frustration that many shareholders might legitimately be feeling.
We spoke for the better part of 30 mins in a wide-ranging conversation , but everything ultimately coming back to the difficult position of trying to achieve 'a change in the dynamics' without being able to say what ZIOC was working on.
Specifically , he said
- unlikely to see a change in GLEN's attitude to greenfield, shared not just by Ivan and Gary but by the ExCom;
- where GLEN had done iron ore projects, they'd been brownfield or offtake involvement;
- the recent doubling up on Colombian coal despite ESG considerations was driven by influential/interested shareholders;
-he acknowledged (MItch's point ?) that there'd been a slowdown on COIDIC side, said this seemed to be as much from internal changes as anything else; coronavirus, meanwhile, was a headwind for everyone;
- re the recent revocation of CongoMining Mayoko Moussendji license, he said that they - unlike Zanaga - couldn't show they'd been actively trying to move things along ; he confirmed that Zanaga had never received any official complaint or approach on this matter;
- Simandou at best would only cover 10 % of China's iron ore imports, China seemed to be looking to Brazil to reduce further its current dependency on Australia;
- I asked re Forrest/Fortescue Mining visits to the area, AT wouldn't comment other than to say that Forrest was one of the few Oz miners who didn't share his compatriots' complacency that China would always be dependent on Australian ore;
- the current high ore price only adds to the frustration; as to cyclicality vs 'commodity supercycle' , AT said the Project remained attractive at $ 70/62% = $ 85 / 65%, esp. in view of lower impurities;
- he acknowledged shareholders 'opportunity cost' concerns, said that he and team were acutely aware of this' having salary-sacrificed the last couple of years' - he also said that none of the shares in lieu had been sold;
- he several times said things to the effect that 'there's a reason for our radio silence' but acknowledged that giving any timing would be a hostage to fortune. He conceded that he might have to reconsider his own position at some point, but 'not for at least a couple of years'.
My take hasn't changed substantially , ZIOC's task is to come up with something that gets GLEN's blessing, what that might be - in the words of the late Donald Rumsfeld - is a 'known unknown'.
With no apparent threat to licences and the overall macro-environment generally positive, it seems there's still an outside chance there'll be a breakthrough at some point. So ZIOC remains a high risk / maybe high reward position for me...and is sized accordingly.
HTH, NAI, DYOR,
I would be interested to know when the comment about change in dynamics was made.
The new dynamics might relate to the fact that firms in China will (in the new 5 year period to 2025) be much more controlled by the state. Which means that economics/profitability will not be the only consideration wrt iron ore deals etc.
https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/aiming-high-can-chinas-steel-industry-hit-its-ambitious-targets/
https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/china-planning-to-establish-iron-ore-supply-overseas-8211-reuters-61934961
In the last few months, we've seen , in no particular order:
- recognition if the links air quality/respiratory infections/coronavirus prevalence (overwhelmingly industrialised areas);
- everyone burnishing their environmental credentials, China has next winter Olympics to think about;
- China ratcheting up on Oz...and that was before the latest subs saga. Encirclement/containment is a somewhat different existential threat (ask Japan); more emphasis on securing resources;
- coup in Guinea calls into question of just switching dependency to another (main) supplier;
- France in June already considering its position in Africa (withdrawing from 6 Sahel countries; having a spat with Central African Republic (C-B's next-door neighbour) over Putin-linked Wagner Group mercenaries' presence);
- France now (subs and implications) facing a(nother) Suez-type moment re its place in the world; in NATO; in the EU (Merkel going); at home + economic slap in the face from Oz;
- Afghanistan is now a 'done deal', the Great Game will be looking for a new playground ie renewed 'scramble for Africa';
- prospective passing of Nguesso pere and grooming of Nguesso fils;
- management change (maybe) at GLEN.
I'd say there's lots of scope for some of this to prompt a change in dynamics.
Whether for better or worse is another matter, of course !