London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East and have access to Premium Chat. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Penguin,, the full sentence was....... "When there is company news i will have something to discuss , until then would you like me to discuss what i would like to happen or past/recent history...factual? or what you would like us to believe.
Now that puts a different slant on things doesn't it.......it emphasises what you do all the time ie:- pick out the bits to make things look different to how they were meant to be......you and the naysaying team do it on many occasions, I got wise to it years ago.....it is a trait of manipulative/argumentative people.......and when it is linked with obsessive megalomania, it becomes unbearable......for the record, yes it would be nice to get a project up and runnin.....without the interference of small minded people who think the world can be changed overnight.....they say you make your own luck........good luck with that
You posted amongst other things:- 'when there is company news i will have something to discuss.....until then do you want me to discuss what i would like to happen'.
I'd be more interested in discussing what you think will happen and what it's based on (a discussion), not what you would like to happen - that's easy we would all like all of UKOG's ventures to be transformational and the SP to rise inexorably to £1 and we'd all be millionaires.
This isn't semantics - it's the difference between the many posters who post (they hope) the SP will be 2p by Xmas or that every activity will be successful, and posters who state what they think will happen and explain why.
So I'm accused, constantly, at the time of posting, of being negative because I post what I think will happen - yet looking back they're almost always more positive than what actually happened.
Consider that when I'm accused of bashing, naysaying etc.
Perhaps a glance at the SP chart might explain why when posting what I expect to happen hasn't been positive - although I rarely mention what I expect the SP to do because whilst fundamentals eventually come to bear anything can happen in between - which is why trading works with UKOG, not holding - see those spikes followed by a fall on the chart.
Adrian (Dense il) Is a swing trader that used to try and influence the market with his tanker pictures, but that’s all gone now, he sold out and bashed the company for months, then he bought back in for a trade on the Loxley permission, that didn’t go well, and he is now underwater, and ramping like mad to try and get his money back, I call him the town clock, with his multiple faces, just beware whether he is bashing or ramping, he can turn on a sixpence, not the type of guy you would like besides you in the trenches….
As you can see with the amount of continual posting he seems quite desperate, good luck to all genuine investors here hoping that things will turn around, we definitely need the oil and gas…
Ha ha should be fothy
Good morning my little frothy friend
And what doom and gloom are you and Heid going to write about today
"GBNews says temperature s falling to minus 10 .
Greta will be furious!"
Erm, Adrian, I'm not sure you've qhite grasped the difference between Temperature Change and Climate Change. Can't say I'm surprised though...
And penguin, there was nothing in that "waffle" that isn't true
Penguin, that would be because Ocelot is also positive.......i know that's a crime as far as you're concerned but as you keep saying it's about opinions
You see anyone who has an alternative view to you, you criticise. You couldn't have a reasonable discussion unless it's with your negative agenda....c'est la vie
Waffle, waffle. There has been plenty of 'company news' since you joined the board yet I'm pretty sure you've never discussed anything except other posters, mostly with yourself and ocelot strangely enough.
Penguin, I don't do guesswork, as I have said before on many occasions i await news updates from the company, you are acting like a child with your "I'm right your wrong attitude" you may delve into information from other sources but you then make it suit your negative agenda, I used to be criticised by you for the amount of posts i made but i came to the conclusion there is no point trying to be reasonable with obsessive megalomaniacs like yourself.....I reiterate.....when there is company news i will have something to discuss.....until then do you want me to discuss what i would like to happen.....or past/ recent history......factual? or what you would like us to believe........yes it appears mr Sanderson only likes to give out good news, so at the moment as their isn't any he is silent. it is also apparent that you only like to talk about bad news and when there isn't any you are noisy , shouting from the rooftops about past history......you may be invested like you say.....only not in UKOG....or you would be totally stupid......which you are definitely not
Yes I do criticise what other posters post - but not every post say's- he's a ramper so ignor it, or therefore everything they say is rubbish - even though it often is.
No - I'll explain why I disagree.
You just snipe and aren't prepared to comment about UKOG:-
'I have my theories but im keeping them to myself until things become clearer.....personal guesswork doesn't prove anything,'
What's the matter afraid your 'guesswork' will be exposed as wrong? You've kept your theories quiet for nearly a year - I don't think I've ever seen a substantive comment about UKOG from you, but hundreds about other posters who presumably you don't agree with - but aren't prepared to 'discuss' - but maybe you can prove me wrong?
please don't think we're all stupid - here's your opinion of 'respected poster ocelot':-
'Freeasabird@davethedrill1 Jun 3
Ocelot or Ocebot :) on lse must be on speed or something. You can't keep posting like that night and day. #ukog
But yes Sando & PR team desperate to get his placing away. What's his bonus for this time?
Tarmacing a road in Turkey maybe?
Freeasabird@davethedrill1 Apr 13
#ukog Just had a look in on the LSE BB. Think Wizard125, ocelot and ninetails have all been on the Happy baccy tonight.'
Adrian you are the most multiple faced, Transparent, Hypocritical swing trader I have come across…And what’s more every one knows that you ramp when you’re invested and bash when you’re out, it’s quite sickening the thought you might con new investors either way depending on your own investment…. You are no more than a wannabe con man but so transparent, I have to get some sleep now early start tomorrow, you will probably be justifiably banned by the time I look in again.
Penguin, it wasn't a joke, it was an answer given in a fit of pique, as usual you 're not fooling anyone....while I'm here you do criticise other posters often....just not the negative trolls, which in effect means you are supporting them. your opinions on the prospects of UKOG are just that, your opinions......albeit based on Sanderson track record which is not very good, what is really going on at UKOG none of us know, I have my theories but im keeping them to myself until things become clearer.....personal guesswork doesn't prove anything, only arguments, as I have said before the future is ours to see.......good or bad......talks cheap......even cheaper when you've nothing to lose..........and patronising........me.......I don't think so.
Can't help but noticing DENSIL has the word LIES in it.
Of course cash flow will improve if water injection works - but for some reason you ignore that UKOG say that's all it will do, not improve production levels - though they probably hope they can tweak it up a bit - maybe a lot for an initial rate to please the punters, as ozzy says what will be etc, opinion is just that.....and so on.
But assuming injection works the cash won't be enough for what UKOG need and it will need to be retained by HHDL for forward plans at HH.
PS when have I said it will fail? Might, could and I give reasons which aren't 'imo'. - haven't you noticed that not everything goes as expected at HH.
Out of curiousity I just searched ignor on FOTH's twitter feed - loads of examples.
ignore (correct spelling) - 3 recent ones - did you forget to spell check, or is your wife(?) writing some of them. Wonder what the 'laughing' you heard was.
Come on - writing posts about Adrian as if you aren't him - grow up - don't worry I won't tell anyone, don't think anyone else noticed, oops seems tollers noticed.
Ocelot - best bit is you won't see this - yawn - ozzy did I say it was a conspiracy, it was a joke so I apologise if it upset you- but if the cap fits, as they say.......
Adrian - is your wife fabricated too?
Unfiltered Penguins to read his post of 16:40 which mentioned yours truly - back on filter again.
what aspect of UKOG do you want to debate?
This board is for discussion about UKOG not posters so I do try to introduce something about the company in my posts even when pushing back - the fact that UKOG has seemingly poor projects is not my fault and I still await information from UKOG that fills in the substantial gaps in their statements about their projects that demonstrates the projects are in fact good rather than chosen excerpts without backup that prove nothing.
As for as 'Penguin, in my post at 00:30 (which was an honest consideration of many posters), which you obviously took to be personal,( i suppose if the cap fits etc)'
erm - as this was the start of your 00:32 post:- 'Penguin, why would anyone who does not have a financial interest in UKOG post so often on this forum, if not for disruptive purposes'
I suppose I could be forgiven for taking it personally.
as for 'opinions are only opinions until they are proven' that's true - but there's a difference between a fact based opinion (boring lecture) to someone believing 'imo' is the same as QED.
BTW both your 00:32 and 17:35 posts seem to be patronising lectures, not discussion - telling me what I should do. Unfortunately, like you, I can choose what and who I post about or reply to.
As you seem to think your role is to criticise posters you 'think' are naysayers I don't need to.
Oh and Penguin, speaking of conspiracy theories (in your 16:40 post to Tollesburystu) your "though Ocelot and Ozzy " pop up" when Ade appears as if commanded " BEATS THEM ALL........ ha ha ha.......careful you appear to be losing the plot
Should have said....."that was the time i was reading a succession of posts"
Penguin, I "popped up" at 00.30 this morning because that was the time I was reading re
Penguin, in my post at 00:30 (which was an honest consideration of many posters), which you obviously took to be personal,( i suppose if the cap fits etc), I asked for you not to give a patronising lecture answer but said i was open to honest debate....as you have not replied to me personally ( but I note you have mentioned me on two occasions to other posters) i can only assume you can not fulfil the honest debate request.....by the way i have never said i don't believe people's "research", what i did say was " opinions are only opinions until they are proven "......followed by......." the only thing that is certain is .....what will be will be "......that i think indicates that i am viewing things with an open mind......the only thing certain in life...... is it's uncertainty.......oh and taxes.....and death.........and naysayers posting on the UKOG chatboard.......for fun, distraction, dishonest and sp and UKOG destruction......I await honest debate
an honest shareholder in UKOG
thought this a more honest thread title (from the 2020 Annual Report and Accounts about HH-2z):- 'Unfortunately, as the test progressed the formation water cut significantly increased to over 70% rendering production of the well technically and commercially challenging.' - apologies, earlier I said 'up to 70%'.
whilst it might not be. as you posted, 'a crime to post positives.'
It has almost always been wrong and quite often not even positive - if not 'soon', eventually - and apparently pointing this out is 'being scared' rather than putting the record straight. More often than not to find out how bad the so called good news is - just wait.
Nobody's scared of what Adrian posts or tweets - don't kid yourself - his whinging about being banned from LSE and often begging to be allowed to return is pathetic - not realising that constantly sneaking backis a further break of the rules.
So the 'good news' is permission to drill a dodgy well, permission to try out water injection. Let's see how 'positive' these things turn out to be with fund raising needed, posssibly for both as the passing months erode UKOG's cash and need to ring fence funds for Turkey. Of course there's the hoped for short term spikes, but a long wait for results - certainly for Loxley.
unfortunately there's also a conspiracy theory promulgated by certain posters that anyone posting sensibly is xr, has no shares or hates UKOG and are acting together (though ocelot and ozzy 'pop up' when Ade appears as if commanded, and all three seem to comment mainly about other posters in the absence of 'positive' things to say about UKOG).