Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
GS,
It always useful to have facts, not information or opinions that have somehow been tainted or manipulated. On that I think we agree.
I wouldn't want anyone to go anywhere, simply because it didn't fit with my opinion or or contradicted it. As you know, in the other place you mentioned, to refer to PANR is a treasonable offence. I quite like to do that because it is relevant to them in the case of the linkages with Talitha. They don't like to admit this linkage; IMHO it is probably their best chance of success and in a very sustainable location. The link is even referenced by their own board of Directors in its corporate communiques and presentations. Ah well.
Good luck.
Thanks cbaron. Yes, honestly I am invested.
To be honest again, I've been pulled up time and time again by others on what, to me, seem minor details. I am simply trying to follow LSE rules on what can be posted. Ie mainly facts, useful info with a few opinions. But I sense ulterior motives by others and that troubles me, especially if they are protecting activities that could be construed as, well, a bit bent. Perhaps it's my training that makes me a bit of an over enthusiastic detail cop.
I'm sure we can all work together if certain posters stop their constant contradictions of others posts. I post only what I see as the truth. Sorry if you want me ramp just because I hold shares but I hold shares because I expect them to go up regardless of these boards. Otherwise, why would I be here reading this stuff.
If you want me to go back to 88e and leave you alone I could do that, but then all the readers on here would not get the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
You get my drift?
GS
PS. The shares converted from non-voting status (circa 34m) were only circa 5% of the total number of shares currently in issue (circa 693m). (RNS dated 29 July 2021).
19.56
The 17.99% represents all shares held and which comprise voting shares only, including those which were recently converted from non-voting shares.
Your argument appears to sway with the flow when the detail is queried. Why are you being so contrarian on such detail?Anyone holding a slightly contrarian view in the other place is roundly rebuked. Are you a holder? Are you a deramper? What are you doing here if you are a non-conformist?
Get my drift?
All views welcome.
I do know that the RNS was after the market closed today. However the transaction was last week, plenty of time for market makers to cotton onto what took place. I don't believe they are bound to wait for RNSs to capitalise on what they know. Common practice as far as I can see.
Yes, the interview and report out today helped the SP hike no doubt, but there was little new information in them, albeit well presented, and the comment about another listing in US was hardly a promise, was it?
As I've said its just my opinion. Thats what these boards are for.
I also know that the 17.99% share holding left in CHONS are voting shares. I simply said that all the non voting shares have now been converted and sold. Its is these shares that were the main part of the GB debt. If Im wrong on this point please let me know.
GS
18:31
GS - I roundly disagree with your explanation for today's rise. I offer as an alternative explanation a) the publication of Conor Maguire's excellent article published on substack yesterday and b) Jay's interview by Proactive Investors published today on YouTube, minutes after which the stock moved up smartly from 66p. I may have been at least partly responsible for the buying in the minutes after the interview was published......because I noted I was only the 7th or 8th person to start watching it!
The TR-1 was received after the market shut this afternoon. In addition there is absolutely no consensus across any of the shareholder forums about Farallon having a set percentage at which all selling activity automatically stops. Mathematically I have not yet seen sufficient proof for this contention and I note many posters have pointed out these supposed percentage thresholds v's absolute number of ordinary voting shares in issue v's the intra-party debt are still far too opaque to make an accurate prediction with any confidence.
For any newcomers, I'll repost the substack article and will provide a link to the CEO's interview of today.
........but the RNS was timed at 5.23pm BST
The news was therefore not known until after the market closed.
The 17.99% remaining are voting shares.
With a little luck that is now the lot sold. The last non voting shares 33,890,478 converted on 29th July have now been sold. The 17.99% level is roughly where they were just before the last conversion.
Most of todays rise is probably because the market recognises this milestone. IMO
GS
So Farallon went through the 17.99% notified today, but that is history. What or who has driven todays rise????