George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
low carb diet dubious, and if you look up the carbs for a piece of KFC (not the burgers or chips) the values are very good. I think it is around 9g per portion. Of course, a serving of 5 portions defeats the objective, but I can have one or maybe two pieces and with everything else be well under my 100g daily carb target.
B.B.
As regards risk: it's not the ups and downs of share prices that should concern you but rather your diet.
Big Blue, i said a cuddle, not that i was offering. You read too much into what i said and got it completly incorrect.
Fuagile, a cuddle form you with all those needles and goo all over your body? Err no thanks. If anything, it plays into my plan that the sp drops so if the switcheroo happens the IAG increase on announcement of transatlantic travel resuming UK to US could be a nice little earner. But, However, the damn Easy J price is being dragged down with the sector and is not decoupling properly. Although as the RNS is studied further IAG is on big dip today bigger than Easy J so ther eis some differential , but not much. You see, Easy J does not have a big news story in the near future to create a spike. IAG does! SO it is all down to the timing and waiting for the RNS is a gamble that seems to have worked for a lower IAG, but very annoyingly EAsy and SSP have been dragged down too. It is to do with the computers and this looks more and more like a distortion in the market and I do wonder if the computers are linking stocks to tightly and therefore in breach of exchange rules. It will be interesting to see what the disparity will be when the US market opens.
While BB puts different glasses on, i am booking my week long trip to Switzerland ;-)
"Travel is restarting and the vaccination roll out is gathering pace, two facts that might be of more use to you."
'However if' you take off the rose tinted glasses and put on the reading glasses, there are plain spoken phrases in the text which are red light warnings. This RNS is basically a warning. IAG [BA in particular] will not be able to take a continuing hit into Q4.
big blue, you said you don't hold IAG yet you're more depressed than any other poster?
You need a cuddle ?
"There is no however, followed by an if in the rns."
Phew, so it is just errant posters that do not understand the damage such phraseology can generate.
BB there is no certainty in investing and theres always risk. Not sure I understand your point? Travel is restarting and the vaccination roll out is gathering pace, two facts that might be of more use to you.
You know i can see 120p if USA corridor does not open up any thoughts guys
There are 7 "however" in the rns.
There are 176 "if" in the rns
There is no however, followed by an if in the rns.
yes new ball game now just going to watch the sp price before buying in but the usa corridor is stopping me investing and worried about the burn rate
"however if"
A single 'however' can set off alarm bells, but IAGlongtern's adding of the dreaded 'if' alongside the 'however' is enough to call up the devil himself. Two words that should never come together when assessing odds and investments, 'however' and 'if'. Cripes, the remaining hairs on my head stood up in fear when I saw that.
"The risk that IAG are referring to in their H1 report applies to all airlines;"
IAG are in a worse place than other airlines. This whiffs like TCG.
The risk that IAG are referring to in their H1 report applies to all airlines; new variants, availability of vaccines, travel restrictions by governments etc. If the situation worsens obviously actions will need to be taken and share price will drop, however if these risks subside and the industry opens back up with pent up demand, the opposite is true. To be honest it seems to be a very transparent half year report. After the past 18 months, we are all very unsure about the future and can only hope for the best.