We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
LoL, that's the thing with Freddie, he always thinks he's being attacked and then plays the 'woe is me' card to posters biggl, etc. The problem for people is that it's difficult to know what side of the fence he really sits on, although he'll insist he's actually sitting on the fence.
He works for a charitable fund the gives away valuable golden tickets. But I think he will soon become a big purchaser. How many does he need?
Still no borders
Greatland Gold Fields £5+
Hi Hydro,
Let's just say we agree, IMHO part of the backgound 'Shorting Operation' ?
Freddie2,
No disrespect, but having read your posts for months and months now, I am somewhat concerned as to why you are even a shareholder of GGP at all?
Jiffy , sell up now at 14p ? Now why would i do that , i am in it to make money not lose it , no one knows the future i was just thinking out loud , touchy some people
Quite simply, all you have to do from now on is simply Hold :O)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaF5MAY1Wow
Bottom line.... Whom hold the most shares in GGP?
PI's :O)
Just to add, re the the other 25%. WE ARE GOING MINING, WE ARE GOING TO OBTAIN POSITIVE CASHFLOW FROM MINING, IN ORDER TO DEVELOP OF OUR OWN TENEMENTS!!!
If you cant' see this as part of our forward looking strategy then you may as well sell up now.
Freddie,
Re: 'If the 25% of hav is taken out could we see the return of gervaise ? '
The 25% has no bearing whatsoever on the current GGP Sp, it will be valued soley on mineral resource value, IMHO.
Why would GH suddenly appear back in the frame, what makes you think that?
RE: 'The 5% is very important as it values the other 25%, so could a big player be waiting on the sidelines ?'
The 5% will be valued as others have already stated, by independant valuers should GGP and NCM differ on value, and Shaun has already alluded to that, so stop fretting.
Still 'Greatland Gold plc' at Companies House as at 3rd December 2021
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05625107/filing-history
Suppose it saves ink to refer to it as just Greatland rather than Greatland Gold - tier 1 gold and copper ):
On the name change, SD has made his multi-commodity aspiration for the company clear, so taking ‘gold’ out of the name is logical enough, although the company website still refers to Greatland Gold.
One question that Freddie has brought up here is why the share chat has been renamed to only Greatland, rather than Greatland Gold. This is also consistent with the company website, in the text the company is only referred to as "Greatland" and the image for the latest presentation "Growth Update October 2021" shows a logo that only reads Greatland, rather than Greatland Gold, even though inside the presentation, the logo is the old one. Can somebody confirm if that was always the case on the website? I hadn't paid attention to it, but now that it was pointed out, could that be a rebranding?
If so, that might even be a signal for good news in the near future, such as a new (non-gold) deposit? Or maybe that's me being naively optimistic and it's just a general rebranding that sets GGP up for the future in a more accurate way - a player in several metals and not just gold?
Didnt need to canary you just did , i was just asking some questions , no need to fall off your perch
Burliegh-I was surprised Freddie didn’t trot out his favourite comparator , he usually mentions SXX when in full flight
That’s good point canary, they could have to pay a fair chunk out of their bank balance but it will underpin their own flagging sp. If it’s undervalued, it sends it down further and opens them up to a takeover.
Or, NCM swerve the situation completely and say no thank we’re happy with 70%.
At which point I’d like to see someone like Franco Nevada step in for a small royalty stream but to see us into production and debt free.
Canary was just some general questions tbf
Nice bit of Fear-mongering from Freddie though..
The key point for NCM is that the 5% must be valued as high as possible.. that means their other 70% will be fully valued.
If the 5% is massively undervalued, then they will be taken over by one of the big boys before you can say Jack frost.
IMO there is absolutely zero chance of an undervaluation of HAV.
Sorry Josh, I shouldn't have mentioned it, just a bit if fun, but rude of me all the same
Davielad, I wrote that post at 5:20am this morning, if you want to be that pedantic then yes, that would have read better. It was still perfectly coherent though.
Great summary Floater and I agree - the cake is big enough to share without anyone needing to get greedy. Shaun appointed a very experienced set of people, so GGP will be quite able to hold their own over a Board table. VGLA - hope the stranglehold on juniors relaxes soon!!!
Freddie, good points for speculation, to comment on some:-
Regarding the SP then many juniors are down this year and in my opinion it's just global economies, market forces and sentiment. IMO then SD has done a good job but unfortunately up for judgement because of the SP but as with my first point above then it is tied in with those current parameters. I don't think it would be any different with GH and actually it would probably actually be regarded a great failure, by many.
Concentrating on the 5% aspect:-
MH01 - similar reply as me, but it's for the 12 blocks of within the E45/4701 tenement which includes Havieron, Zipa, Hav North and the other targets within that boundary - although the whole area is generally regarded as Havieron.
If NCM were want to be sneaky and try and get the 12 blocks at a low price then why would they be drilling other targets in the area to try and prove mineralisation exists close to Havieron, and also why would Fraser MacCorquodale be saying there could be other Havierons close to the original :- “This is all about (finding if there) are there more Havierons floating around Havieron,” https://www.australianresourcesandinvestment.com.au/2021/08/03/newcrest-looking-to-find-more-havierons-in-the-paterson/
Any other reasonable find within the 12 blocks would add value to the 5%. Also lets not forget that Havieron is still open at depth and at the sides, so the 5 % might not just be for what is known and may include an uplift for some assumptions of the open extent and the possibility of mineralisation at the other targets. NCM are experts are what they do, so they are not silly when it comes to exploration.
Taking into account that NCM work in the ESG framework (and of course there is also the 3/2 committee at Havieron), then I'm quite sure NCM are not going to be dishonest or have GGP over with results, etc; they do work within the ESG framework. Let's not forget Shaun has put together a formidable experienced team which is not just forward thinking to where he wants the company to go; it is also there to provide the expertise when working with NCM on the JV’s. Some people on here go on about NCM hiding drill results or playing it down at Hav – if unexperienced people on here can think that then do you not think the GGP board would also think that; and do people think they are not up to the task of assessing and analysing the results from NCM - really? Also, GGP do have 2 members of the 5-person management committee at Hav and NCM might be the overall managers at Havieron but GGP are no mugs.
So IMO the NCM and GGP will negotiate to a fair agreement for the 5% of the 12 blocks and it will not be a rushed decision, so should come after at least the MRE upgrade.
I've got to go out now so others can speculate on your other points.
"I don’t think anything too untoward is going on personally."
Or do you mean - personally I don't think anything too untoward is going on?...lol
A good post josh. l agree with most of you post I also share your concerns about the possibility of a underpriced takeover As l previously held shares of another junior gold mining stock that had received a totally undervalued offer but the offer was recommended to be excepted buy B.O.D. Lucky the bid was rejected and within 18 months with the help of the mostly new B.O.D the company was later sold for 2 times the original offer….l will end by saying it is a very small word in the junior mining industry …
Simple reply. 5% of Havieron. Not 5% of GGP.