Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Mr LuckyLuciano,
I didn't mean to be so obtuse in my post, but so many times I have seen that sort of behaviour as I have expressed. Apologies if I misunderstood your position here.
Regards
ST
MR.Spacetomato
please allow me to make this clear. What made me keep posting afterwards is the ambiguity in which this rns has been written, together with the potential of this company future, (I am not sure if is understandable). In any case no hidden motives and sorry for been misinterpreted, I was not trying to drumm anything with deramping intentions, it was just my way to stimulate a meaningful debate on the matter. I did say that I was considering re-investing in FAR . I can see you point tough and in the future will try to keep my opinions to my self. My apologies.
LL
Can you private message me
Do do you post this board with unrelated and off topic info
Really nit right .
As The famous Arnie quote says ... I WILL BE BACK !
EyeGuy, I am with you on this. If I had sold here I would not be drumming the reasons here. I would not even say goodbye. I sell and get out. I guess there must be some "reason" to do continue posting on this bb; love for debate far? I guess not!
Please, either back or stay away. I am not interested, after your first post telling us why you sold, in hearing your continuous postings on your reasons. I think most here understood you no longer want the shares.
Goodbye
ST
Tra1
strange that you know the reason because I though I explained mine clearly before. But please what is your take?
Please tell me why I have lost money in the past?
I like to think that I have been the only one able to decipher this rns enigma, or that at least have been the one that tried harder. I am not excluding to re-invest in FAR at all, but for my rationale the way this rns was presented made this share a bit too expensive...and by the way I can be completely wrong. More over some other factors in the macroeconomy and vanadium renewable space have come in play and I rather wait to see how they develop.
Apologies if this has dragged on a little to long no intention to offend anyone for that matter.
Hazbeen
considering how lucky you are in picking the right moment to invest, I would be very interested to know which investment it is, it should be a rock bottom bargain price by now.
Just joking mate.
Please mention it (this board permitting) and then maybe we can meet in this other investment of yours board, to exchange views.
bye all
LL
I have another investment that I am holding . If you are interested let me know .
It is a class Tier 1 resource and the BoD are world class.
I have been invested in it since the last at least 7 years
*losing
Luciano, you said earlier you keep loosing money with your investments, now i know the reason!
Good luck Hazbeen and luckyluciano.
You have both said your are out.
You have both said your piece.
Respectively now move on.
I can't disagree with you Hazbeen.
Even if exaggerating a bit you make many valid points.
Thank you for correct gullible with naïve a true gentlemen.
I mean naive not gullible
Gawd you guys are are so gullible
Ppl will read into based on their emotional position on the stock
All will be revealed when results come out
RNS should not go be broken and deeper analysed to understand what it means
It is simple to me , learned to read in between the lines
Production and Revenues will significantly lower now
By product is a side show to confuse you and soften the RNS.
Basically trying to tell you indirectly that the cash we raised will now nit be enough
You will see when next update or results come out .
I am done now on this RNS
Good luck all
What it means is that due to on-going Covid-19 restrictions, which is expected to significantly reduce down-time (I had to reassemble the news to understand it better, the bit regarding the electricity is irrelevant because electricity outage was already a know factor and also because it would happen on and off, not permanently meaning that production wouldn't be affected as much as a complete shout down due to covid19) ....some interruptions to production in the next few months are expected.
The bit at the end "... the impact on revenues and earnings will be significant in the context of the current processing operation" therefore probably refer to the positive impact of by-product production.
I say probably because I wouldn't like to mislead anyone in here.