The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Filtered eh!!
Head in the sand, more like it.
I noticed yesterday, that one investor, very soon after your utter drivel postings sold 2500000 shares.
On todays share performance, that person lost almost 10%.
It is not out with the bounds that you may, in part be responsible for that.
What is said on these pages can have a direct input into some investors reasoning or thought processes.
People like you are dangerous and can be harmful to peoples wealth.
Please go away, I have not seen a single post here that welcomes your input.
And as far as filtering me and others, THE SUN GOD with his/hers giant ego will not be able to resist a sneaky peek.
Have you written to our CEO yet, thought not!
Will you be at the Time with the Team session, absolutely not.
All mouth and trousers or even culottes!! LOL!
WT
WT, I quote figures direct from company documents to assess the fundamentals and you project your own nonsense. Says it all. Filtered.
Hi Sun God!
Back again I see, you are not of the ramper persuasion that we saw late last year, you are the disruptor ilk seeking to put investors off buying shares or even trying to make a pathetic case for them to dispose of them.
Have you emailed Echo or Martin Hull with your self-obsessed "concerns," I do not think so?!!?
Have you purchased any shares? After describing the shares yesterday as a "blind punt," your words; then I think that you would be in common parlance a moron and a cretin, if you had had a "Eureka" moment overnight and ate your words.
So I ask myself, why are you posting here?
Are you being paid to do so?
So often paid posters go away, predominately out of working hours and weekends.
What do you hope to achieve, your posting history is a fairly dismal one.
I personally am of the opinion that you are a self-serving attention seeker who has far too much time on His/hers hands with little or no money to invest. You bounce around LSE Boards like a deflating football seeking validation and responses.
I feel really sorry for you.
Maybe you are unemployable, with the traits that you demonstrate, I think that this is entirely possible.
I would hope that I speak for many investors on this LSE Board, that you are wasting your time and that your deramping output is not welcome here.
SUN GOD, if the name and it's connotations did not make me laugh out loud, I would feel very sorry for you.
You have an inflated view of yourself, you look for followers and you seek recognition.
And you are probably posting from your bedroom, in your PJ's, is that your Mum calling you down for your lunch?? lol!
Get a life, preferably away from LSE Investor boards or even seek paid employment, once you are old enough.
WT
7.13 MMBOE [not BBOE] (225 x 0.19 / 6) net to ECHO for Lobe C at 34% COS and 7.19 MMBOE ((154 + 73) x 0.19 / 6) net to ECHO for the secondary targets of Lobes D and G combined @ 20% COS.
Fillybus 6'400+ posts!!!!! Life is passing you by son. It really smacks of "Look at Me"
After reading your posts of the last few days my eyes glazed over. SelfKidology I think it's called
Why not just spell out clearly what is being targeted by each well? Investors are left trying to piece together an assortment of data from the admissions document CPR appendices, investor presentation diagrams and RNS fragments with different names used in different contexts. I expect most folks don't even know this information exists. Also, since the admissions document CPR we've had another seismic campaign on Tapi Aike, so why no update on resource figures and COS? If today's RNS is referring to Lobes C, D and G, then on a P50 recoverable basis using the old data we get 7.13 BBOE (225 x 0.19 / 6) net to ECHO for Lobe C at 34% COS and 7.19 MMBOE ((154 + 73) x 0.19 / 6) net to ECHO for the secondary targets of Lobes D and G combined @ 20% COS, but it is unclear whether these are the actual targets of the well or what impact this years seismic has had on the figures.
Why not just spell out clearly what is being targeted by each well? Investors are left trying to piece together an assortment of data from the admissions document CPR appendices, investor presentation diagrams and RNS fragments with different names used in different contexts. I expect most folks don't even know this information exists. Also, since the admissions document CPR we've had another seismic campaign on Tapi Aike, so why no update on resource figures and COS? If today's RNS is referring to Lobes C, D and G, then on a P50 recoverable basis using the old data we get 7.13 BBOE (225 x 0.19 / 6) net to ECHO for Lobe C at 34% COS and 7.19 MMBOE ((154 + 73) x 0.19 / 6) net to ECHO for the secondary targets of Lobes D and G combined @ 20% COS, but it is unclear whether these are the actual targets of the well or what impact this years seismic has had on the figures.
The best guess is that the first well is tagetting Lobes C, G and D with COS of
If you cant be bothered to find out the information yourself your best off not investing.
I believe there may be a time with the team arranged soon so you could ask your questions on there.
Bye, bye!
It is so amusing that anyone who actually wishes to be taken seriously should employ the avatar of The Sun God!
More likely someone with an overinflated opinion of themselves.
WT
Obviously you jokers don't seem concerned that you don't really know what your investing in. Investors should not have to presss the BOD directly for this information, it should be front and center in their RNS statements and the fact that it isn't is a major red flag. The fact you try and deflect this by playing the man not the ball only adds to my concerns. Good luck if you have taken a position here, but despite previous hopes for Tapi Aike I no longer feel a rush to invest. GLA
Yes you should try to email the BOD, they communicate one to one
Agreed WT and NY
Hi Phoebus
You did not reply as to whether you are a current Echo shareholder.
I said that Martin Hull is available to all us long term shareholders or maybe even prospective ones for inquiries.
If you are not happy with the level information that has been released, and therefore draw the conclusion that it is "a blind punt," and do not seem willing to contact Martin Bell for clarification, might I suggest that you might look elsewhere for a place to invest.
Surely posting on a Board where the share, in your view is inadequately explained must be a waste of your time and my Wednesday afternoon wondering what your actual agenda is?
You appear to have posted 91 times in the last 30 days on 10 LSE Boards.
Clearly someone with far too much time on his hands and as you say, looking for a response.
We had similar as you last year attempt to cause discord, they came and went - as all bad smells do!?!
WT
agreed this chap obviously doesn't have any shares and its looking for a response.
The SP is not far off all time lows and a well has just been spudded so now looks like an opportune moment to invest. However, the lack of information makes it impossible to assess the investment case and take a big position in a considered manner. Not the way to treat investors.
Hi Phoebus
I read your last post with interest.
Since your opinion of ownership of Echo shares is a "bind punt!"
Am I therefore to conclude that you in fact own no Echo shares?
WT
The other three targets could be even more miniscule and in any case what COS are the 4 drills? Surely the key point is why are management failing to clearly disclose the most important data points required by investors when investing in exploration drilling? Usually small exploration companies are only to happy to showcase their P50 recoverable and COS data to lure in investors. If management has to be pressed directly it makes you wonder what they're trying to hide. How on earth investors are supposed to appraise this opportunity and commit funds is beyond me. Nothing but a blind punt.
Only 1 of 4 it’s the cumulative picture that the upside
Hi Phoebus
Might I suggest that you email Martin Hull with your questions and/or concerns?
I have previously found him unfailing helpful both in email format or even in one-to-one discussion.
He does have a very busy schedule, unsurprisingly but has got back to me as time allowed.
I hope that this helps.
WT
I presume you are referring to this:
https://www.echoenergyplc.com/media/1499/echo-energy-tapi-aike-drill-programme-presentation-nov2019.pdf
Already read it. Does not give the P50 recoverable figure only the GIIP and there is no COS. Even if we use a RF of 80% we get 420 BCF x 0.8 = 336 BCF P50 recoverable gross, which is only 63.8 BCF or 10.6 MMBOE net to ECHO. Hardly huge is it. No wonder they're not shouting the actual figures from the rooftops. Surprised they didn't use the P mean figure to obfuscate even more.
if you go on to the echo website they have a presentation of tapi aike and the first drill info on there.
Utterly meaningless.
Huge and very high :-)
What is P50 target size? What is the COS?