Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
@johnpohn. I am kind of agreeing with you. I am expecting compromise agreement(s) being redlined at a law firm for whosoever mucked up the handling of the IPO to exit stage right. Going forward need calibre staff to meet firm's amazing potential.
Rorydinho your spot on with your post, all the investors signed up and where prepared to pay $18.40, so why just discount it another $3
Anyway I am disappointed but still no doubt we will be £2+ in the next few weeks
@Moneyman
"the-Chuz well done today with your decision today certainly paid off as is stands."
The theory was right but I lost my bottle and bought back in before lse closed today. Originally I thought the adr were going to start at 2pm so I could make some quick decisions and react.
When I found out it would be after the lse closed I had the FOMO and got back in 100%.
The logic was there, the emotion got me.
Not if you're sarcastic about ...
"When PW can talk about it" - absolute nonsense that he can't talk about it ... like previous time ... earlier today, we had Remitly CEO several newscasts talking about their IPO on Nasdaq which was also today
@Mwhite
It's up 16% from the listing price it's now $17.44, it's going up.
Of course it's all relative it always is.. If your someone who bought in earlier then youd think it was great.
Bothered face, bothered face... I ain't bothered.
Hiya johncon... Can you please give me the 15 pretty basic points please...need some bedtime reading.
Am I missing something? Up 16% on NAS. What were people expecting to happen?
the-Chuz well done today with your decision today certainly paid off as is stands.
GLA
MM80 ARB-£5
Johnnpon
"I'm concerned about how long we will have to wait until we get back to 150 pence ... I'm worried about the risk to the donwside here. And i'm long"
About a week should do it, probably less, frett not.
I can tell you - as someone who works with this stuff - this is a screw up for the ages ... I can give you ~15 pretty basic points where they went wrong ... the problem is: after a day like this, it takes the share price a very long time to 'forget' the vulnerability ... I'm concerned about how long we will have to wait until we get back to 150 pence ... I'm worried about the risk to the donwside here. And i'm long.
When PW can talk about it , will be interesting to get his side of it.
Surely if it was so oversubscribed the price would have rocketed as those people who missed out or got a smaller allocation would be piling in to buy more shares ?
Now you have NASDAQ holders looking at the OTC price and OTC holders looking at the NASDAQ price so they don’t get caught out, which may explain why the SP not moving.
I disagree entirely; I think the SP would be closer to $20 if it had been better managed.
I’ve seen lots of posts in various forums of how people were only allocated 1/3 of what they requested in the offering. So, arguably, 3x oversubscribed at $15.
I’d also say that a lot of the OTC holders sold up in the mayhem, which dropped the price and these people didn’t buy back in on NASDAQ because of the the mayhem.
The offering price should have been higher and the whole OTC - NASDAQ situation should have been much better managed.
Early days but as the share price is currently approx 10% up on the listing price doesn’t that show that PW and the Inst were pretty much spot on about how the market valued the company. Don’t see this as a failure at all and expect the price to increase steadily as Argo start to release more news on growth.
Any investor casting doubt or does nit understand sell and leave the other shall I say more savvy investors to make some money. To many kids trying to de ramp in an subtle way embarrassing
Well folks a fine mess it's turned into our big day on the nasdaq has went badly wrong imo
Yet again more share issues that's with all the warrents and mates rates share dilutions we have had to stand over past 9 months way way to much
Don't forget dilution is exactly that that's your shares and mine a company can only go so far till the share we own become more worthless
It's happened before company's having share issues left right and centre have went to far and become more or less worthless
Why didn't we list on the NASDAQ the day like if a person wanted to buy ARB or sell done it with ordinary share and ordinary share price all this has been a complete disasters
In peter we trust is starting to ware very thin with me far to much to soon and as ever the market says so as well
@Moog
"New share holders up around 10%
The loyal share holders down 28%"
Unfortinatly as I've posted.. What is good for the company is not always good for existing shareholders.
PW isn't anyone's 'mate', he will get as much money as he can for the company, existing shareholder have already been rinsed of thier money. The company is only interested in the money of new shareholders.
Existing shareholders are cash pigs who usually go to Slaughter.
BUT it means the IPO was priced right and the company maximimised the amount of cash it got from IPO investors.
Quarters and years according to PW (hate that saying BTW)
New share holders up around 10%
The loyal share holders down 28%
Not great at all to be honest matter about all the waffle on here
Nope. Not yet at least.
But you can buy on HL no?
I'd say it's clearly an artifically low price. It's significantly - very significantly - below the recent average price, probably partly due to confusion over the multiple listings, probably other non-company-specific reasons too. But it's clealry a screaming buy at sub-£1.20 equivalent.
But it doesn't really matter, as I have no plans to sell. I'm mostly just annoyed I can't buy at this price, because if I could, I would be, and if I can in the morning, I will be.
My question is has the Evergrande money come in to pay offshore bond holders (ie. banks) for money to flow here. Otherwise, happy voted against employee plan. Need to prove themselves, eg. getting ARBK set up on stockwits.
Amanensia; atm I said how would you rate this then
Hahaha that was predictable. Go join Tiger and denby you muppet.