If you would like to ask our webinar guest speakers from WS Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund a question please submit them here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Don't remember expressing myself in quite those terms, but there's nothing wrong in trying to buy in at the bottom, we are agreed on that.
Just mildly amused by your obvious agenda, "Ocelot".
By the way, thanks for the incredibly astute advice you offered earlier. You know, where you said people should in general look to buy into any share at its lowest pricepoint. Who would ever have thought of that? Pure genius...
Good to see, with your "realism", you maintain your interest in ANGS, HeadinThe Sand.
...and I'm surprised that at least one permanently positive poster here doesn't realise that, in basing his entire opinion on puff, spin and "jam tomorrow" PR as spouted by the CEO and not on any of the actually evidenced realities of the stock, he is openly revealing the complete lack of foundation for his opinion.
(And his agenda too).
Surprised people don't realise that, in focusing their comments on the poster and not on the stock, they are openly conceding the weakness of their arguments.
Funny that none of the Chartists spotted the imminent catastrophic decline in the share from 12p - they're all over the board posting their mathematical mumbo-jumbo when it's buy time but bloody useless when they might be useful.
Sconnybotland,
With the benefit of hindsight, one can certainly say it was a "strong sell" at 12p last year.
But today, at 0.775p, after a decline of 93.5%, it is, imho, very far from obvious ANGS constitutes a "strong sell".
Then you have still to see a paid ramper, jaffas.
a paid ramper if ever I've seen one
This board contains both positive and negative posters on ANGS.
Amongst those who are negative, suspect there are some who are waiting for a clear sign that the share price has bottomed before buying in.
Thought my posts were about ANGS, HeadinTheSand, but stand corrected by your good self.
Glad to see your "realism" has brought you back to posting on ANGS without too much of a delay.
Ocelot, that's pretty hypocritical, coming from you.
All you ever do while continuing to assure everyone that all is wonderful in the world of ANGS, is play the man, not the ball.
And what does "playing the man, not the ball" mean in your case? It means you just endlessly parrot unsubstantiated puff and spin from Georgie and present it as if it were fact, all while avoiding real and evidenced facts about the company.
So how about you take your own advice?
wealdpwr,
Why not play the ball (ANGS) instead of the man (the poster)?
Looks like Vonkey was on the Sauce last night.....LOL
Hope your heads ok this morning wealdpower!!
The point being if you are working for falstaff or angs , and saying the word ‘buy’ you would be in as much trouble ax Julianne Assange
Apologies
. I suspect a deep imvestigation will find you working for ANGS and crossing a red line. Carry on touting the lie, IMHO , it is a lie.
Apologies. :
t does not seem like AIM is for you as well. You deny giving advise or beii ok no an advocate for ANGS
Correction : you deny giving advice or being an advocate for ANGS.
Gee, Postalot
It does not seem like AIM is for you as well. You deny giving advise or beii ok no an advocate for ANGS. Yet if authorities found out you are working ANGS , I suspect you would be in a bit of trouble. Continue to pretend to play the middle and only quoteLord Lucan. I suspect a deep imvestigation will find you working for ANGS and crossing a red line. Carry on touting the lie, IMHO , it is a kid and will catch up with you. Ironically, the lackey Lucan will hang you out to dry. As I said, I hope ANGS is paying you by the word for your rubbish.
I also suspect that thsy are asking you to bait investors to keep conversation on this BB.
Therefore, I suggest we all ignore Postalot. And despite his legitimate points
JA 51. as they serve opposite POV but benefit fro the same dither.
GlA and pls DYOR
Best wishes, wherever your "realism" takes you next.
I agree. ANGS is not for realists.
It doesn't sound as if ANGS or, indeed, AIM is for you, HeadinTheSand.
You'll also find it not AT ALL unusual for company CEOs to be - shall we say - "unfortunately lacking in the accuracy department"? "Only acquainted with the truth in passing"? Or perhaps "significantly overoptimistic in their predictions"?
What would be unusual would be for any PI with even the smallest experience of the markets to set any store whatsoever by what a CEO may opine - especially in some puff piece interview - or rather adverview.
FFS this is AIM. More than half the time you can't even trust the information that companies release via RNS.
GL is Angus's MD.
This board is for discussion of Angus.
If you look at other boards, you'll find it is not unusual for the company's CEO to be quoted.
Given your Lucanista mantras, quoting Lord Lucan and cut+ pasting, as I said. you clearly may not either.
Have a good weekend.
PiranhaPires,
Given the importance of the mining sector to the FTSE100, I think you're being a bit harsh to suggest that the City doesn't know anything about what it's investing in.