We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Hubbabubbas, you seem to be at ease with everything, when do you think Amit going to finally pay someone instead of these meaningless updates, which have thus far proven consistently wide of the mark, by some distance?
I reckon there will be a lot more updates, because those are simply enough to keep Hubba and other happy enough
Nearly a week without an update, got to be one due, surely🤣.
I’m guessing tomorrow as the pressure is building, Action Fraud, FCA, SFO, Columbo, Vera, The Sweeney, maybe even Jonny English will get involved 🤣
Of course Beastie is directing his anger at Amit, isn’t he, 🤣, that’s why he seems to target shareholders on this chat instead. Joker
It's not anger, it's an observation, you're not significant enough to get me angry
Pity you can't find something more useful for your hands, although I'm sure they get plenty of exercise as it is
So the agents have had shareholder emails for a while now, I do hope they're hands are ok as seems like all of them can't type an email or click the send button.
Havegun is a numpty because he/she has no opinion. Check out the last 50 posts. Every one just says filtered bye. There's zero point in coming on to a chat forum and filtering everyone it's complete madness.
According to trombone anyone posting against amit is a numpty, classic case of 'its everyone else, never me'.
Wonder if anyone is brave enough to post that shareholders or brokers will get notifications from the agent this week?
Any takers??? Hubba, Helx, Trombone, 1984....?
Had enough of you too,Bye.
Is there any way you can filter yourself havegun? What a numpty
Havegun
Recommend 👍🏻
I am bored to death with your rubbish.Filtered.
Whether Amit/Cloudtag Inc/ SB Corp meets the necessary criteria for a ‘serious fraud investigation’ … well, that is way beyond my remit, and yet to be considered by the powers that be…
AIM4
You have replied to me before, also I
appreciate your comments … thank you
I think it’s good for shareholders to have balance, to also have trust… whether that be with Amit himself, and if not, then other organisations such as the SFO
‘Can the SFO take action against both UK and foreign companies?
First, the SFO may still use its powers under section 2(3) of the CJA to compel a UK company or a foreign company with a fixed place of business in the UK to produce documents held outside the UK.’
Though Amit without doubt, other than an NDA… has a clear paper trail...
..As I’ve posted before in reply to you, of course wrongdoing in any sphere that resulted in a conviction would potentially impact holding a FCA credential - but that doesn’t mean it is the job of the FCA to investigate or prosecute.
If you sleep better by believing that every single activity an individual undertakes within the separate legal entities they are connected to automatically comes under the regulatory and legislative regimes that variously attach to individual enterprises then my apologies for troubling you with my understanding.
Unless you can directly link SB corporate into the Cloudtag saga, the FCA registration for that entity is completely irrelevant to activity conducted in connection with Cloudtag.
Consider it done… also his name is no other than… guess what… ?
Though let’s face it… it’s not for me to investigate :)
Unless you can directly link SB corporate into the Cloudtag saga, the FCA registration for that entity is completely irrelevant to activity conducted in connection with Cloudtag. I gave a personal example of how a product I held with a wholly owned subsidiary of Nationwide BS was completely outside of FCA protection despite NBS being FCA regulated. Can’t post any link as it will be behind a paywall, but last Sunday’s Sunday Telegraph had an article about Newcastle BS members being totally abandoned by them and the FCA over an associated party who were introduced by them and put assets in trusts which later involved huge losses - the setting up of the trusts was not under FCA protection. There was a quote along the lines of the FCA having a very narrow focus on what was strictly within its remit - which is difficult to actually argue with. It would need legislation changes to put those activities within the FCA remit.
Oh… least I forget and whilst I’m at it… for absolute clarity
The regulator has a wide range of disciplinary and enforcement tools in its armoury including private warnings and public censures. However,
the imposition of financial penalties is the most frequent sanction it employs. It is worth remembering that FCA prosecutions can and will impose custodial sentences.
I’m sure I read somewhere Amit disclosed himself as a lawyer…???
Who knows for sure. It’s always good to question
Hellie…
‘but I gave them as much detail as possible including SB Corp details, Amit's UK company. This saga has dragged on long enough.’
Interestingly 20 readers have recommended your post, though none seemingly are willing to offer their opinions in respect, so one could presume they hold similar opinions to yourself …
Your post is somewhat astute… the SFO have a clear ‘paper trail…’ should they choose to investigate.
Given that ABH (Amit) has without doubt has laid down this clear ‘paper trail’
Via companies house…
Given registered, also regulated details re the FCA…
Also more importantly, information conveyed to shareholders via the Cloudtag website … $50 million sat awaiting to be paid out to shareholders… c$230 million sale, to swiftly follow.
And I kinda like this, essentially because to me - well - it is without doubt transparent. Well, let’s just say, I’m not confused, it’s what I expect… because it’s what we as shareholders were told.
It’s all there… openness, for anyone to see, also make their own judgements. Therefore making the job of any investigating officer (SFO) a clear avenue to pursue (should it be necessary?)
It’s not my intention to be adversarial/contentious … though I kinda like it in some perverse way… to challenge :))
‘fools talk, cowards are silent, wise men listen' …. Courtesy of Dougie …
Choose your poison …. ;)
If all else fails… copy in your MP… looool …
Apologies for being facetious, I couldn’t help myself 😈…
Personally I would report it to the city of London police who have the national lead on fraud Action fruad is really just a filter system to pass low level stuff down to plod locally. The city f London use foresenic accounts if they think there is a realistic chance of prosecution. They have a limit of about £22 million for them to take a serious interest. I once had good contacts with them. It needs to made clear that although your actual loss is peanut money in the schem of things the
whole action ie all of the shareholder loss number is a lot more than 22 mill.
I would also just quickly check on what the legal definiition of fraud is on the dot gove law site, certainly when I had contact with the city of london plolice they found many cases of losses but did not fall within the definition of fraud.
I would aslo copy in the complaint to your MP
To Crystal Palace today 👏👏👏👏👏
I've submitted the Cloudtag web site to Action Fraud and received a case number. I'll see if anything comes of it, but I gave them as much detail as possible including SB Corp details, Amit's UK company. This saga has dragged on long enough.
Wolf or Wor Street - Twitter..
I’ve just had correspondence with
Amit Ben-Haim CEO of #CTAG
Confirmation that emails from the ‘paying agent’ will be received by the close of play on Wednesday 17th April 2024
The greater the pressure, the brighter the diamond