Savannah Resources Regulatory News (SAV)

SAMPLE

Northing

Easting

Fe203 (%)

Li2O (%)

Cs (ppm)

Nb (ppm)

Rb (ppm)

Sn (ppm)

Ta (ppm)

FIN001

6732953

314874

0.64

4

21.7

43.9

4.9

FIN002

6733042

314481

1.16

0.02

39.3

69

163.5

16

31.6

FIN003

6829974

376485

1.12

1.29

1540

67

3020

356

162

Datum: ETRS-TM35FIN

David Archer

Savannah Resources plc

Tel: +44 20 7117 2489

David Hignell / Gerry Beaney (Nominated Adviser)

Northland Capital Partners Ltd

Tel: +44 20 3861 6625

Jon Belliss / Elliot Hance

(Corporate Broker)

Beaufort Securities Ltd

Tel: +44 20 7382 8300

Charlotte Page / Lottie Brocklehurst

St Brides Partners Ltd

Tel: +44 20 7236 1177

Sampling techniques

· Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

· Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

· Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.

· In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

· Assay results obtained relate to rock chip sampling

· All rock chip samples were random in nature to ensure that they were representative

· Total sample of around 1kg was pulverized for assaying

· Samples were geologically logged on site and there AMG co-ordinates recorded.

· Samples are then dispatched to ALS Laboratories in Perth for analysis using the following process route.

· Whole sample is dried at 85°C, Crush to 70% -10 mesh (2mm), 100% pulverize to 85%passing -200 mesh (75 μm).

· Al2O3, As, CaO, Co, Cr2O3, Cu, Fe2O3, K2O, Li2O, MgO, MnO, Ni, Pb, S, SiO2, TiO2, Zn all assayed via inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP - AES). A prepared sample (0.2g) is added to sodium peroxide flux (~2.6g), mixed well and then fused in a 670°C furnace. The resulting melt is cooled and then dissolved in 30% hydrochloric acid. This solution is then analysed by ICP-AES and the results are corrected for spectral inter-element interferences.

· Cs, Nb, Rb, Sn, Ta, Th, U all assayed via inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectroscopy (ICP - MS). A prepared sample (0.2g) is added to sodium peroxide flux (~2.6g), mixed well and then fused in a 670°C furnace. The resulting melt is cooled and then dissolved in 30% hydrochloric acid. This solution is then analysed by ICP-MS and the results are corrected for inter-element interferences.

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

· The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

· For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

· Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.

· The analytical techniques used are appropriate for the elements and mineralization styles being explored for.

· Savannahs QAQC protocol is to industry standards with standard reference material and blanks submitted at a minimum of 5% frequency rate.

Verification of sampling and assaying

· The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

· The use of twinned holes.

· Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

· Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

· No independent or alternative verification of the assays has been made

· No adjustments have been made to the assay data

Location of data points

· Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

· Specification of the grid system used.

· Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

· Holes have been located using a handheld GPS unit using WGS84

· No topographic data is available

Data spacing and distribution

· Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

· Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

· Whether sample compositing has been applied.

· Sample spacing was random and based on geological observations

· Samples were collected along or on potential mineralized rock types

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

· Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

· If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

· Sampling has predominantly targeted pegmatite bodies and at times the alteration halo around the pegmatites into the country rock

Sample security

· The measures taken to ensure sample security.

· Chain of custody is managed by Savannah. Samples are stored on site in a locked yard. Samples are then transported to Perth by airfreight. Savannah personnel have no contact with the samples once they have been dispatched.

Audits or reviews

· The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

· No audits or reviews of the sampling techniques or data have been completed.

Mineral tenement and land tenure status

· Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

· The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a license to operate in the area.

· Somero, 100% owned prospecting permit VA2016:0019

· Earajarvi, 100% owned prospecting permit VA2016:0018

· The tenement is in good standing with no known impediment to renewal.

Exploration done by other parties

· Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.

· Key Reference: Geological Survey of Finland Bulletin 134 (1981) Granitic pegmatites of the Erajarvi area in Orivesi, Southern Finland

Geology

· Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.

· The deposit type is LCT (Lithium, Cesium, Tantalum) pegmatites are a petrogenetically defined subset of granitic pegmatites that are associated with certain granites. They consist mostly of quartz, potassium feldspar, albite, and muscovite. Common accessory minerals include garnet, tourmaline, and apatite. The major lithium ore minerals are spodumene, petalite, and lepidolite; cesium mainly comes from pollucite; and tantalum mostly comes from columbite-tantalite.

Diagrams

· Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

· Relevant diagrams and maps have been included in the main body of the release.

Balanced reporting

· Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

· All results have been reported.

Other substantive exploration data

· Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

· Further exploration work is underway and will be reported when it becomes available.

Further work

· The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

· Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

· Further geological mapping and rock chip sampling is underway to further define the areas of potential anomalism