Petrel Resources Regulatory News (PET)

27 September 2011

Petrel Resources Plc

("Petrel" or the "Company")

Interim Statement for the period ended 30 June 2011

In a period of unprecedented uncertainty it is pleasant to be able to report that Petrel holds cash balances of almost $6 million and has no liabilities. This money came from payments for our original 50% stake in the Subba and Luhais EPC contract in Iraq. We continue to hold a 10% profit interest in the project but in the light of inflation in Iraq and design changes, there is unlikely to be a significant payoff. Petrel obtained final sign off on our involvement in May 2011. The new 100% operator, Makman, expects to complete the work shortly.

The other good news is that our Ghanaian licence application, where we hold a 30% interest, is making progress through the regulatory process in Accra. To remind you, in 2010, our group Ghanaian vehicle (owned 30% by Petrel, 60% by Clontarf Energy and 10% by Ghanaian interests) signed an agreement with the Ghanaian National Petroleum Company (GNPC) to explore Tano 2A, a 1,532 km2 onshore/offshore block close to the Kosmos/Tullow Jubilee block. The agreement, as with all such projects in Ghana, was subject to Cabinet and Parliamentary approvals. I am hopeful that this process is nearing finality. While awaiting acceptance we have not been idle. The Tano Cretaceous model is now well established. We target the same source rock and reservoir in our work. We have acquired and processed all of the available data capable of being reworked. We have identified a number of areas of interest which will be followed up. Petrel staff are playing a full part in operations. While the delay is frustrating to all, the rapid development of Ghana as an oil province in the past two years and the current high oil price make the concession more attractive now than when we signed.

Ratification of the Tano 2A concession by the Ghanaian parliament will trigger immediate and extensive activity. Technical and financial advisors are advising us on how best to progress an ambitious three year exploration programme. There is a high level of initial interest from potential partners. Rapidly evolving technology, attractive fiscal terms and international oil prices that seem stuck at high levels make Ghana a compelling story at a time when many other high-potential areas remain closed to investment due to poor economic terms or political uncertainty.

After 14 years in Iraq it continues to frustrate. The economy remains fragile, as does the security situation. There is still no hydrocarbon law. As such, our legal position is in limbo on the 10,000 sq km area of ground in the Western Desert formerly known as Block 6. We will protect our interest in this block. The terms on offer in the recent 4th licencing round were very tough. Indeed in numerous instances we remain nonplussed as to how the super-majors will ever make money. We struggled to explain the financial logic behind bidding for low returns in projects which involved geological, as well as operational and political risks. Required economic rates of return have risen with the enhanced uncertainty of recent years. Politicians do not always understand that risk and reward are correlated, but the financial markets do.

Nevertheless, because of our operating experience and long-standing commitment to Iraq, we prepared detailed comprehensive proposals for the 4th Licencing Round. We had high expectations of making the approved list but it did not happen. We are taking a fresh look at our approach in Iraq. This may lead to a change in strategy. Iraq still offers the best hydrocarbon potential worldwide but it does not make sense to work for inadequate returns.

Outside of Iraq and Ghana we see a flow of hydrocarbon proposals. As an established AIM company with cash and a wide base of shareholders we attract attention and interest but to date, with one exception, we have not seen anything which we deem to be superior to investing in Ghana and continuing to pursue an oil project in Iraq.

The one exception involves a return to our Irish roots. Petrel was, in 1982, a partner in offshore Irish exploration. It was unsuccessful at that time. Thirty years on, new technology and models, together with high oil prices have led to renewed interest. Petrel has bid on three separate packages in the prospective Porcupine area in the current Irish offshore Atlantic Margin bid round. We expect a decision from the authorities during the 4th quarter of 2011. We are quietly confident.

The potential in Ghana, the renewed prospects offshore Ireland and our ongoing interest in being part of Iraqi oil development provide a platform for developing Petrel.

John Teeling

Chairman

_____________________________________________________________________

Enquiries:

www.petrelresources.com

Notes:

1. INFORMATION

The financial information for the six months ended 30 June 2011 and the comparative amounts for the six months ended 30 June 2010 are unaudited. The financial information above does not constitute full statutory accounts within the meaning of section 148 of the Companies Act 1963.

The Interim Financial Report has been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting as adopted by the European Union. The accounting policies and methods of computation used in the preparation of the Interim Financial Report are consistent with those used in the Group 2010 Annual Report, which is available at www.petrelresources.com.

The interim financial statements have not been audited or reviewed by the auditors of the Group pursuant to the Auditing Practices board guidance on Review of Interim Financial Information.

2. No dividend is proposed in respect of the period.

3. LOSS PER SHARE

Basic and diluted loss per share is the same as the effect of the outstanding share options is anti-dilutive and is therefore excluded.

4. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Exploration and evaluation assets at 30 June 2011 represent exploration and related expenditure in respect of projects in Iraq, Africa and Ireland. The directors are aware that by its nature there is an inherent uncertainty in relation to the recoverability of amounts capitalised on the exploration projects. In addition, the current economic and political situation in Iraq is uncertain.

The group's activities are subject to a number of significant potential risks including:

- Foreign exchange risks;

- Uncertainties over development and operational costs;

- Political and legal risks, including arrangements for licenses, profit sharing and taxation;

- Foreign investment risks including increases in taxes, royalties and renegotiation of contracts;

- Liquidity risks;

- Operations and environmental risks.

The realisation of these intangible assets is dependent on the successful development of economic reserves, including the ability to raise finance to develop the projects. Should this prove unsuccessful the value included in the balance sheet would be written off to the statement of comprehensive income.

Regional Analysis - Group

5. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

In respect to the amounts due from Makman a total of $4.5 million had been received in 2010 and, the final payment of $2.5 million was received on 3 May 2011.

6. The Interim Report for the six months to 30 June 2011 was approved by the Directors on 26 September 2011.

7. Copies of the interim report will be sent to shareholders and will be available for inspection at the Companies Registered Office at 162 Clontarf Road, Dublin 3, Ireland. The Interim Report will also shortly be available for viewing at Petrel Resources plc's website at www.petrelresources.com.