Frontera Resources Regulatory News (FRR)

15 Aug 2008 07:00



FRONTERA RESOURCES CORPORATION

Houston, Texas, U.S.A. - 15 August 2008

SECOND QUARTER 2008 RESULTS AND OPERATIONS REVIEW

Frontera Resources Corporation (London Stock Exchange, AIM Market - Symbol: FRR; OTCQX Market, U.S.A. - Symbol: FRTE), an independent oil and gas exploration and production company, today announced results for the quarterly period ended 30 June 2008. 

2008 Q2 Financial Highlights

Revenues from crude oil sales for the quarter ending 30 June, 2008 were $2.9 million, an increase of $2.3 million from $0.6 million during the same period last year. Revenues for the first six months of 2008 were $1.1 million higher than in 2007.

Results for the quarter ended 30 June 2008 reflect a net loss of $5.5 million, or $0.08 per share on a fully-diluted basis, in line with the early stage nature of the company's asset portfolio and expenditures required to evaluate the company's undeveloped fields and exploration opportunities. 

Strong working capital position to continue planned investment programs.

2008 Q2 Operational Highlights

Taribani Field Unit - Increased production from continuation of Zone 9 development program. A rig is currently being mobilized within Block 12 to commence drilling the next Zone 9 well, Taribani South #1, in early September.

Shallow Fields Production Unit - Achieved a 30% increase in oil production through an aggressive new drilling campaign across the Unit that is ongoing. Drilling campaigns within the Mirzaani, Mtsare Khevi, Nazarlebi and Patara Shiraki fields have resulted in continued profitable production and Q2 oil revenues of $2.6 million. 

Basin Edge Play Unit - Continued exploration effort at "C" Prospect with reprocessing of 3D seismic survey to incorporate drilling results to date. Early results confirm large size and up-dip potential associated with this giant prospect. Efforts continue to secure a new rig for continuation of Lloyd #1 well operations.

Mirzaani Field Area Exploration Unit - Continued efforts to farm out the Mirzaani Deep Prospect in order to accelerate drilling of this large prospect situated beneath the currently producing Mirzaani Field.

Block 12 Area Wide Development Unit - Evolved Frontera's extensive inventory of undrilled prospects and undeveloped fields in anticipation of mid-term and long-term value creation opportunities. 

Additional background, details and updates of the company's ongoing progress can be found at www.fronteraresources.com.

  Enquiries:

Frontera Resources CorporationLiz Williamson Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications (713) 585-3216lwilliamson@fronteraresources.com 

Brunswick Group LLP Patrick Handley / Camilla Gore London: +44 207 4045959

Nominated Advisor:

Morgan StanleyJon Bathard-Smith

+44 20 7425 8000

Notes to Editors:

1. Frontera Resources Corporation is an independent Houston, Texas, U.S.A. - based international oil and gas exploration and production company whose strategy is to identify opportunities and operate in emerging markets around the world. Frontera has operated in Georgia since 1997 where it holds a 100 percent working interest in a production sharing agreement with the government of Georgia. This gives Frontera the exclusive right to explore for, develop and produce oil and gas from a 5,060 square kilometer area in eastern Georgia known as Block 12. For more information, please see www.fronteraresources.com.

2. This release may contain certain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, expectations, beliefs, plans and objectives regarding the potential transactions, potential drilling schedule, well results and ventures discussed in this release, as well as reserves, future drilling, development and production. Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements are: future exploration and development results; availability and performance of needed equipment and personnel; seismic data; evaluation of logs and cores from wells drilled; fluctuations in oil and gas prices; weather conditions; general economic conditions; and the political situation in Georgia and neighboring countries. There is no assurance that Frontera's expectations will be realized, and actual results may differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements.

Frontera Resources Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007

Page(s)

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Balance Sheets 1

Statements of Operations 2

Statement of Stockholders' Equity 3

Statements of Cash Flows 4

Notes to Financial Statements 5-12

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 13-20

1. Nature of Operations

Frontera Resources Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively "Frontera" or the "Company") are engaged in the development of oil and gas projects in emerging marketplaces. Frontera was founded in 1996 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas. The Company emphasizes development of reserves in known hydrocarbon-bearing basins, and is attracted to projects that have significant exploration upside. Since 2002, the Company has focused substantially all of its efforts on the exploration and development of oilfields within the Republic of Georgia ("Georgia"), a member of the Former Soviet Union.

In June 1997, the Company entered into a 25 year production sharing agreement with the Ministry of Fuel and Energy of Georgia and State Company Georgian Oil ("Georgian Oil"), which gives the Company the exclusive right to explore, develop and produce crude oil in a 5500 square kilometer area in eastern Georgia known as Block 12, hereafter referred to as the "Block 12 PSA". The Block 12 PSA can be extended if commercial production remains viable upon its expiration in June 2022.

Under the terms of the Block 12 PSA, the Company is entitled to conduct exploration and production activities and is entitled to recover its cumulative costs and expenses from the crude oil produced from Block 12. Following recovery of cumulative costs and expenses from Block 12 production, the remaining crude oil sales, referred to as Profit Oil, are allocated between Georgian Oil and Frontera in the proportion of 51% and 49%, respectively.

Under the terms of the Block 12 PSA, Frontera is exempt from all taxes imposed by the government of Georgia, and any taxes imposed on the Company shall be paid by Georgian Oil on behalf of the Company from Georgian Oil's 51% share of Profit Oil. Taxes are defined by the Block 12 PSA to mean all levies, duties, payments, fees, taxes or contributions payable to or imposed by any government agency, subdivision, municipal or local authorities within the Government of Georgia.

Frontera's future revenues depend on operating results from its operations in the Republic of Georgia. The success of Frontera's operations is subject to various contingencies beyond management control. These contingencies include general and regional economic conditions, prices for crude oil, competition and changes in regulation. Frontera is subject to various additional political and economic uncertainties in Georgia which could include restrictions on transfer of funds, import and export duties, quotas and embargoes, domestic and international customs and tariffs, and changing taxation policies, foreign exchange restrictions, political conditions and regulations. The recent hostilities between Georgia and the Russian Federation over the separatist regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia may interrupt and adversely affect the Company's operations and ability to market production from Block 12, in particular if military operations escalate and extend to Frontera's operating areas. At present, the Company's operations are continuing without disruption. Frontera's business units within Block 12 are located approximately 100 miles or more east of South Ossetia. The Company is closely monitoring the situation and the international efforts to bring about a negotiated solution, and will take measures to secure worksites, assets and personnel as appropriate.

2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The condensed consolidated balance sheet of the Company at December 31, 2007 was derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements as of that date. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2008, the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the condensed consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity for the six month period ended June 30, 2008, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were prepared by the Company.

In the opinion of Company management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows were recorded. The results of operations for the three month period ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for a full year or of future operations.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007.

For a description of the Company's accounting policies, refer to Note 2 of the 2007 consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company implemented Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 157, Fair Value Measurements for its financial assets and liabilities that are being measured on a recurring basis. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 did not have an effect on the Company's financial statements other than requiring additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. See Note 3 for further discussion of the Company's fair value measurement.

Restricted Cash

At June 30, 2008 the Company had approximately $10.0 million of restricted cash. Restricted cash in the amount of $5.0 million serves as collateral for a $5.0 million line of credit that is used from time to time to support letters of credit that provide financial assurance that the Company will fulfill its obligations with respect to service contracts with certain vendors. The remaining $5.0 million is a portion of the proceeds from the convertible note issuance in May 2007 of approximately $67.0 million, which was being held in escrow until the Company's stock price met certain agreed benchmarks. In July 2008, the $5.0 million was released from escrow by unanimous consent of the noteholders in connection with the Company's private placement of new convertible notes. See Note 10 for further discussion of the new convertible notes.

Short-Term Investments

Short-term investments consist of Municipal Short Term Auction Rate Securities ("M-STARS") and corporate bonds both of which represent funds available for current operations. In accordance with the SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, these M-STARS are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at cost or par value, which approximates the fair market value. These securities have stated maturities beyond three months but are priced and traded as short-term instruments due to the liquidity provided through the interest rate mechanism of 7 to 35 days.

The auction process resets the applicable interest rates at prescribed calendar intervals and is intended to provide liquidity to the holders of auction rate securities by matching buyers and sellers in a market context, enabling the holders to gain immediate liquidity by selling such securities at par, or rolling over their investment. If there is an imbalance between buyers and sellers, there is a risk of a failed auction. Due to recent credit issues experienced by short-term funding markets, some of these securities, including our M-STARS, have failed at auction in 2008. An auction failure is not a default, and in some cases it could reset the applicable interest rates to a higher rate as outlined by the security. The Company does not currently intend to liquidate these investments at below par value or prior to a reset date but has recorded a temporary impairment of $0.5 million with regards to these investments (see Note 3). The Company will continue to assess the fair value of these securities at the end of each quarter. Based on the Company's ability to access cash and cash equivalents, expected operating cash flows and other sources of cash, we do not anticipate that any lack of short-term liquidity related to these securities will materially affect the Company's ability to operate its business.

Short-term investments consisted of investments in M-STARS with an estimated fair value of $12.1 million and $25.6 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively (see Note 3).

3. Fair Value Measurements

The Company implemented SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008 for its financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis. SFAS No. 157 applies to all financial assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 by one year for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities.

As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 requires disclosure that establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The statement requires fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. The Company considers active markets as those in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3: Measured based on prices or valuation models that required inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and less observable for objective sources (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

As required by SFAS No. 157, financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. Per SFAS No. 157, the Company has classified its short-term investments into one of the three levels based upon the data relied upon to determine the fair value.

Liquidity in certain auction rate securities markets was also significantly reduced during the first six months of 2008, resulting in wide-spread auction failures and increasing rates for auction rate securities. Third-party pricing services are either no longer providing valuations for failed auction rate securities or are valuing such securities at par (which may not necessarily reflect prices that would be obtained in the secondary market for such securities if such a market were to develop). As a result, the Company assigned these securities to level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. In the absence of a secondary market, fair value was estimated based on a number of factors including the credit quality of the obligor, the credit quality of the bond insurer, the coupon, and the likelihood of refinancing by the issuer.  Based on this analysis, a temporary impairment of $0.5 million was recorded at June 30, 2008 to accumulated other comprehensive loss on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company's financial assets by SFAS No. 157 pricing levels as of June 30, 2008.

The table below sets forth a reconciliation for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the first quarter of 2008:

4. Detail of Certain Balance Sheet Accounts

Inventory consists primarily of materials to be used in the Company's foreign oilfield operations and crude oil held in stock tanks. Inventory is valued using the first-in, first-out method and is stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventory consists of the following:

5. Notes Payable

Line of Credit

During 2007 the Company established a $5.0 million line of credit with a commercial bank by agreeing to collateralize $5.0 million of cash and cash equivalents. The line was primarily set up to support letters of credit issued by the Company from time to time in support of its oil and gas operations.  The line of credit remains in place during 2008 and approximately $2.0 million had been borrowed against the line at June 30, 2008. No amounts were borrowed at December 31, 2007.

In February 2008, warrant holders exercised warrants to purchase 377,418 shares of common stock in a cashless exercise, pursuant to the warrant agreement. After this exercise no warrants remain outstanding.

In April 2008, the Company borrowed approximately $9.5 million under a short term note agreement with a bank, collateralized by its short term investments in M-STARS. The note was due in July 2008 and was subsequently renewed in July for 90 days.

6. Convertible Notes

During May 2007, the Company raised approximately $67.0 million through a private placement of convertible unsecured notes due May 2012.  The notes were issued at par and bear interest at 10%, payable quarterly in arrears in cash or in kind at the Company's discretion.  The notes are convertible into shares of common stock at conversion price of $1.67 per share.  The notes will be automatically converted into common stock at the conversion price if the stock price exceeds two times the conversion price for at least 20 consecutive trading days. As part of the closing of the notes, debt issuance costs of approximately $2.7 million were incurred, of which approximately $1.5 million was paid in cash and $1.2 million of additional convertible notes and stock options were issued for the remainder.

During June 2007, note holders holding $100,000 of convertible notes elected to convert their notes into 59,880 shares of common stock.

During January 2008, note holders holding $110,500 of convertible notes elected to convert their notes into 65,906 shares of common stock.

During the second quarter of 2008, noteholders holding $2.6 million of convertible notes elected to convert their notes into 1,556,880 shares of common stock. Noteholders also elected to convert approximately $310,000 of related interest into 135,094 shares of common stock.

At December 31, 2007, March 31, 2008  and June 30, 2008 the Company elected to pay their quarterly interest payments in kind and issued approximately $1.7 million for each period, respectively, in additional convertible notes in accordance with terms of the note purchase agreement.

7. Income Taxes

The Company has incurred losses since inception and, therefore, has not been required to pay federal income taxes. In accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles, the Company estimates for each interim reporting period the effective tax rate expected for the full fiscal year and uses that estimated rate in providing income taxes on a current year to date basis. The Company has established a valuation allowance that is primarily attributable to U.S. federal deferred tax assets. Management believes enough uncertainty exists regarding the realization of the deferred items and has recorded a full valuation allowance.

For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, no income tax payments were made.

8. Commitments and Contingencies

SOCAR Arbitration

In June 1998, Frontera Resources Azerbaijan Corporation, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a production sharing agreement with the State Oil Company of the  Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR), hereafter referred to as the "Azerbaijan PSA". The Azerbaijan PSA covered the Kursangi and Karabagli onshore oilfields in an area of Azerbaijan known as the "K&K Block". The Company and an operating partner undertook an exploration and development program on the K&K Block. The Company's relationship with SOCAR deteriorated as a result of several disputes under the Azerbaijan PSA and the Company was unsuccessful at reaching a settlement with SOCAR.

Frontera initiated binding arbitration against SOCAR in October 2003 related to claims resulting from SOCAR's halting of oil exports from the K&K Block during the fourth quarter of 2000. The arbitration was held in Stockholm under the rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. In January 2006, the arbitral panel found that the halting of exports of crude oil from the K&K Block was in violation of the Azerbaijan PSA and awarded Frontera approximately $1.2 million plus interest from 2000 until payment is made. The arbitral panel rejected all other claims and counterclaims between the parties.

SOCAR has refused to pay the award and filed an action in the Svea Court of Appeals in Stockholm to annul the award. The Company moved to dismiss on procedural grounds, and the court ruled in the Company's favor on a majority of the counts. The proceedings are continuing before the appeals court, a preliminary hearing is scheduled for September 2008, and final disposition is expected in 2008. As a result of SOCAR's refusal to pay the award, the Company commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in February 2006, seeking to enforce the award. In March 2007, the District Court granted SOCAR's motion to dismiss, and the Company appealed that decision in July 2007 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The hearing on the appeal is expected to occur in the third quarter of 2008.

GAC Arbitration

In June 2007, Frontera Resources Georgia Corporation, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company ("FRGC"), was served a notice of arbitration and claim by GAC Energy Company and an affiliated company (collectively, "GAC"). GAC and Frontera were parties to a Farmout Agreement dated June 2002 covering Block 12 (the "Farmout Agreement"), pursuant to which GAC would earn a 25% working interest in Block 12 and a 12.5% interest in Frontera Eastern Georgia Limited, an indirect consolidated subsidiary of the Company ("FEGL"), upon the fulfillment of certain financial and work program commitments. In September 2004, as required under the terms of the Farmout Agreement, GAC reassigned its interest in Block 12 to Frontera as a result of GAC's default on its financial and work program commitments. The notice of arbitration and claim alleges that GAC did not default on its obligations under the Farmout Agreement and should be awarded a 25% working interest in Block 12, a 12.5% ownership interest in FEGL and a proportionate share of the revenue from oil sales from July 2002 to August 2003. In August 2007, Frontera filed its statement of defense and counterclaims against GAC. Frontera considers the GAC claim to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against this claim. The evidentiary hearing in the GAC arbitration was held in July 2008. The arbitrator's decision is expected to be announced in the fourth quarter of 2008.

ARAR Arbitration

In January 2008, FEGL, served a notice of arbitration and claim on ARAR, Inc. ("ARAR"), for breach of contract under a drilling services contract dated May 2007, specifically for, among other things, failure to commence work by the time specified in the contract, failure of the drilling rig to meet required specifications and failure to reconcile advance payments made by FEGL with work actually performed. FEGL terminated the contract after ARAR failed to mobilize the rig to the required location and failed to commence work as otherwise required under the contract. FEGL seeks damages of approximately $7.0 million in the arbitration. ARAR denies FEGL's claims and has filed counterclaims against FEGL, seeking payments in excess of $3.0 million for, among other things, standby charges for the period of time the rig was undergoing inspection and repairs to bring it into contract specification, early termination fees and demobilization fees. Frontera considers the ARAR counterclaims to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself. The evidentiary hearing has been scheduled for December 2008.

9. Stockholders' Equity

Preferred Stock

The Company has the authority to issue up to 10,000,000 shares, par value $.00001, of serial preferred stock. No preferred stock was outstanding at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The Board of Directors may designate and authorize the issuance of such shares with such voting power and in such classes and series, and with such designation, preferences and relative participation, optional, or other special rights, qualifications, limitations, or restrictions as deemed appropriate by the Company's Board of Directors.

Common Stock

As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 the Company was authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.00004 per share. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had 72,696,676 and 70,463,408, respectively, of common shares issued and outstanding. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there were an additional 12,981,000 and 15,061,000 shares, respectively, of common stock reserved for the exercise of existing options and warrants.

Treasury Stock

At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had 5,739,855 shares of treasury stock, all held as common stock.

For the six months ended June 30, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense related to common stock options of approximately $1.3 million in 2008 and $1.2 million in 2007. Stock-based compensation expense is reflected in general and administrative expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

10. Subsequent Event

On July 3, 2008, the Company raised $23.5 million through a private placement of convertible unsecured notes due July 2013. The notes were issued at par and bear interest at 10% payable quarterly in arrears in cash or in kind at the Company's discretion.  The notes are initially convertible into common stock at a conversion price of $2.14 per share.  The conversion price was subsequently reset to $1.71 per share, pursuant to the terms of the notes, since the price of the common stock closed at or below $1.71 per share for 10 out of 20 consecutive trading days.

The notes will be automatically converted into common stock at the conversion price if the closing stock price exceeds two times the conversion price for at least 20 consecutive trading days.

The Company solicited consents from holders of its 10% convertible notes due 2007 to amend the note purchase agreements governing such notes to permit the issuance of the new notes and to release the remaining escrowed proceeds of $5.0 million from the May 2007 private placement.  In connection with the solicitation, each consenting holder received a warrant exercisable into shares of common stock in an amount equal to 7.5% of the number of shares of common stock into which such consenting holder's existing notes were convertible.  The warrants are exercisable for approximately 3,151,000 shares of common stock in the aggregate.  Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $3.50 per share, and includes a cashless exercise provision.  The warrants have a five-year term and contain other customary terms and provisions.

Introduction 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements and related notes thereto. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our future plans, estimates, beliefs and expected performance.  The forward-looking statements are dependent upon events, risks and uncertainties that may be outside our control.  Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements.  Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, market prices for natural gas and oil, economic and competitive conditions, regulatory changes, estimates of proved reserves, potential failure to achieve production from development projects, capital expenditures and other uncertainties, as well as those factors discussed below, particularly in "Risk Factors" and "Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements," all of which are difficult to predict.  In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed may not occur.

The financial information with respect to the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 that is discussed below is unaudited. In the opinion of management, this information contains all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, necessary for the fair presentation of the results for such periods. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full fiscal year.

Overview of Our Company 

Frontera Resources Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively "Frontera" or the "Company") are engaged in the development of oil and gas projects in emerging marketplaces. Frontera was founded in 1996 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas. The Company emphasizes development of reserves in known hydrocarbon-bearing basins, and is attracted to projects that have significant exploration upside. Since 2002, the Company has focused substantially all of its efforts on the exploration and development of oilfields within the Republic of Georgia ("Georgia"), a member of the Former Soviet Union. Prior to 2002, the Company's other significant operating focus was on the exploration and development of an oilfield within the Azerbaijan Republic ("Azerbaijan"), which was sold during 2002 and all operating activities in Azerbaijan ceased at that time.

In accordance with full cost accounting rules, we are subject to a limitation on capitalized costs.  The capitalized cost of natural gas and oil properties, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization, may not exceed the estimated future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves discounted at 10%, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of unproved properties as adjusted for related tax effects, which is known as the ceiling limitation.  If capitalized costs exceed the ceiling limitation, the excess must be charged to expense. We did not have any adjustment to earnings due to the ceiling limitation for the periods presented herein. 

Results of Operations  

Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2007

Revenue. Total revenue increased to $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $1.9 million in the same period in 2007.  This increase was primarily due to higher commodity prices in the 2008 period.

Operating Costs and Expenses. Total operating costs and expenses increased to $11.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $9.3 million for the same period in 2007. 

Field operating and project costs includes the costs associated with our exploration and production activities, including, but not limited to, drilling, field operating expense and processing costs. 

Field operating and project costs increased $0.2 million primarily due to the cost of oil sold in Q2 2008 versus cost of oil sold in Q1 and Q2 2007.

DD&A decreased $0.1 million primarily due to our oil processing facility becoming fully depreciated during 2007.

General and administrative expenses increased $1.8 million to $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $6.4 million for the comparable period in 2007. Salaries and wages accounted for $1.1 million of the increase primarily attributable to our staff in Georgia.  Approximately $0.8 million of the increase was due to the cost of ex-patriate staff added in the second half of 2007 and due to charging certain senior drilling staff to general and administrative expense in the 2008 period that had been charged to operating expense in the 2007 period.  The remaining $0.3 million increase was due to Georgian national staff salary increases, which are dollar denominated, to adjust for the weakening dollar and higher income tax rates which increased from 12% in the 2007 period to 25% in the 2008 period.  Legal expenses increased $0.8 million primarily due to expenses incurred in preparation for arbitration hearings and other general corporate matters during the first half of 2008. The remaining $0.1 million decrease was primarily attributable to lower shareholder relations expenses in the 6 months ended June 30, 2008 versus the comparable period in 2007. 

Other Income (Expense). Total other expense increased to $3.3 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2008 from other expense of $0.1 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2007. The $3.2 million increase in other expense is primarily attributable to an increase in interest expense of $3.0 million and a $0.1 million decrease in interest income. 

Interest income decreased to $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $0.8 million for the same period in 2006. This decrease was due to interest income from excess cash in investment accounts which was higher in 2007 due to the Company's May 2007 $67.0 million convertible debt offering.

Interest expense increased to $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $1.0 million for the same period in 2007.  This increase was primarily attributable to the Company's $67.0 million convertible debt offering which was outstanding for the full six months ended June 30, 2008 versus being outstanding for only 52 days in the comparable period in 2007.

Results of Operations 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2007

Revenue. Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased to $2.9 million from $0.6 million in the comparable 2007 period.  The increase is due to higher quantities sold and higher commodity prices in Q2 2008 versus Q2 2007.

Operating Costs and Expenses. Total operating costs and expenses increased to $6.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $4.9 million for the same period in 2007. 

Field operating and project costs includes the costs associated with our exploration and production activities, including, but not limited to, drilling, field operating expense and processing costs. 

Field operating and project costs increased $1.2 million to $2.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007.  This increase was primarily due to the higher quantities and related cost of oil sold in the 2008 period versus the 2007 period.

DD&A was unchanged during the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. 

General and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million to $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $3.7 million for the comparable period in 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to a $0.5 million increase in compensation expense related to our Georgian operations. The increase is attributable to additional ex-patriate staff and a change in classification for senior drilling managers from operations expense in the 2007 period to general and administrative expense in the 2008 period. Also national staff salaries, which are dollar denominated, were increased to adjust for a weakening dollar and an income tax increase from 12% in the 2007 period to 25% in the 2008 period. We also had a $0.3 million increase in legal expenses which is primarily attributable to preparation for arbitration proceedings and other general corporate matters.  These increases in the 2008 period were partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in other G&A including travel, consulting, office services and audit services as compared to the same period in 2007. 

Other Income (Expense). Total other expense increased to $1.9 million in the three month period ended June 30, 2008 from other expense of $0.5 million in the three month period ended June 30, 2007. The $1.4 million increase is primarily attributable to an increase in interest expense of $1.2 million and a $0.2 million decrease in interest income. 

Interest income decreased to $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $0.5 million for the same period in 2007. This decrease was due to lower available cash for investment in the 2008 period as compared to the same period in 2007.

Interest expense increased to $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $1.0 million for the same period in 2007.  This increase was attributable to the Company's $67.0 million convertible debt offering in May of 2007. The debt balances in the 2008 period were outstanding 90 days versus only 52 days outstanding in Q2 of 2007.

Liquidity and Capital Resources 

Summary 

Our operating cash flow is influenced mainly by the prices that we receive for our oil production; the quantity of oil we produce; and the success of our development and exploration activities.  Currently we do not generate sufficient operating cash flows to cover our general corporate activities or our planned capital expenditure programs.

As of June 30, 2008, our cash and cash equivalents were $5.8 million, our short-term investments were $12.1 million and we had approximately $10.0 million of restricted cash. In July 2008, $5.0 million of the restricted cash was released in connection with the issuance of new convertible notes. The remaining $5.0 million serves as collateral for a $5.0 million line of credit that is used from time to time to support letters of credit that provide financial assurance that the Company will fulfill its obligations with respect to service contracts with certain vendors.  See Notes 2, 5, 6 and 10 of the attached financial statements for further discussion of the convertible notes, the line of credit, the restricted cash and the new convertible notes. At June 30, 2008 the Company had $69.3 million of convertible long term debt outstanding. The company also had a $9.5 million short term note payable to a bank which was collateralized by $12.1 million in short term investments in M-STARS, and $2.0 million dollars payable pursuant to funds drawn against a $5 million dollar line of credit with its primary bank. The Company had no other outstanding debt at June 30, 2008.

In July 2008, the Company received proceeds of $23.5 million pursuant to the private placement of convertible notes due July 2013. In connection with the placement, $5.0 million of restricted cash was released from escrow pursuant to unanimous consent of noteholders from the Company's $67.0 million dollar private placement of convertible debt in May 2007.  Also, in July 2008, the $9.5 million short term note payable was renewed for 90 days. See notes 5 and 10 in the attached financial statements for further discussion of these transactions.

Liquidity in certain auction rate securities markets was also significantly reduced in the first and second quarter of 2008, resulting in wide-spread auction failures, including our M-STARS, and increasing rates for auction rate securities.  Third-party pricing services are either no longer providing valuations for failed auction rate securities or are valuing such securities at par (which may not necessarily reflect prices that would be obtained in the secondary market for such securities if such a market were to develop). As a result, the Company assigned these securities to level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.  In the absence of a secondary market, fair value was estimated based on a number of factors including the credit quality of the obligor, the credit quality of the bond insurer, the coupon, and the likelihood of refinancing by the issuer.  Based on this analysis, a temporary impairment of $0.5 million was recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. See note 3 in the attached financial statements for further discussion.

Capital Expenditures 

We make and expect to continue to make substantial capital expenditures in the exploration, development, and production of natural gas and oil reserves.  We believe that our cash flows from operations, current cash and investments on hand will be sufficient to meet our capital expenditure budget for the next six months. 

We estimate that our total capital expenditures for 2008 will be approximately $44.2 million, of which $24.1 million had been spent as of June 30, 2008.  Our planned 2008 capital expenditures represent a 50% increase over actual 2007 capital expenditures. 

Our 2008 capital expenditures are focused on growing and developing our reserves and production on our existing Block 12 acreage. Of our total $44.2 million capital expenditure budget, approximately $44.0 million is budgeted for exploration and production activities in the Tarabani, Basin Edge and Shallow Fields Production Unit.

Cash Flow Activity 

Operating Activities. Cash flows used in operating activities decreased $0.5 million to $12.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $12.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily attributable to changes in operating assets and liabilities of $0.6 million and an increase in non cash interest expense and debt amortization of $4.0 million dollars. This was partially offset by a higher net loss of $11.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $7.5 million for the comparable period in 2007 and a $0.1 million increase in stock based compensation in the 2008 period versus the 2007 period.

Investing Activities. Cash flows used in investing activities decreased $30.3 million to $3.4 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2008 from $33.7 million in the 2007 period.  The decrease was primarily attributable to a net $27.2 million purchase of short term investments and auction rate securities and a $5.0 million balance in restricted cash in 2007 compared with a $13.0 million redemption in the 2008 period.  This was partially offset by a $14.9 million increase in capital expenditures for the six months ended 2008 as compared to 2007 as the Company's drilling campaign was launched later than originally expected in 2007 versus the substantial drilling campaign that was underway in Tarabani and Basin Edge units in the 2008 period.

Financing Activities. Since March 2005, we have used equity issuances, borrowings and, to a lesser extent, our cash flows from oil sales to fund our exploration and production costs and general corporate overhead.  Cash provided by financing activities decreased $33.4 million to $16.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $49.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Net proceeds from borrowings decreased to $11.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, from $65.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in 2008 versus the 2007 period was primarily attributable to the net proceeds of the $67.0 million convertible debt offering closed in Q2 2007 which was partially offset by $11.4 million of borrowings in the comparable 2008 period attributable to short term notes and the company's line of credit with a bank. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 $5.1 million of cash was provided by the release of previously escrowed loan proceeds and related interest. During the comparable 2007 period $15.1 million of proceeds were restricted as to use and classified as restricted cash. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 we received $0.1 million from the exercise of stock options and received zero from stock option exercises in the comparable 2007 period.  We used the net proceeds to fund our capital expenditure programs and for general corporate purposes and short term investments.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table outlines our contractual obligations and commitments by payment due dates as of June 30, 2008 (in millions):

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates 

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make assumptions and prepare estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and revenues and expenses.  We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable; however, actual results may differ.  See Notes 1 and 2 ("Nature of Operations" and "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies") to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our significant accounting policies.

Risk Factors

Risks Related to the Natural Gas and Oil Industry and Our Business 

Natural gas and oil prices are volatile, and a decline in natural gas and oil prices can significantly affect our financial results and impede our growth. 

Our revenue, profitability and cash flow depend upon the prices and demand for natural gas and oil.  The markets for these commodities are very volatile.  Even relatively modest drops in prices can significantly affect our financial results and impede our growth.  Changes in natural gas and oil prices have a significant impact on the value of our reserves and on our cash flow.  Prices for natural gas and oil may fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for natural gas and oil and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control, such as:

Lower oil and natural gas prices may not only decrease our revenues on a per share basis, but also may reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we can produce economically.  This may result in our having to make substantial downward adjustments to our estimated proved reserves.

Our estimated reserves are based on many assumptions that may turn out to be inaccurate. Any significant inaccuracies in these reserve estimates or underlying assumptions will materially affect the quantities and present value of our reserves.

The present value of future net cash flows from our proved reserves will not necessarily be the same as the current market value of our estimated natural gas and oil reserves.

Unless we replace our natural gas and oil reserves, our reserves and production will decline, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our potential drilling location inventories are scheduled over several years, making them susceptible to uncertainties that could materially alter the occurrence or timing of their drilling.

We will not know conclusively prior to drilling whether natural gas or oil will be present in sufficient quantities to be economically viable.

Our use of 2-D and 3-D seismic data is subject to interpretation and may not accurately identify the presence of natural gas and oil, which could adversely affect the results of our drilling operations.

Market conditions or operational impediments may hinder our access to natural gas and oil markets or delay our production.

Our development and exploration operations require substantial capital and we may be unable to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory terms.

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which may adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to operate our business.

Competition in the natural gas and oil industry is intense, which may adversely affect our ability to succeed.

Our operations expose us to potentially substantial costs and liabilities with respect to environmental, health and safety matters.

The inability of one or more of our customers to meet their obligations may adversely affect our financial results.

Our development and exploration operations require substantial capital and we may be unable to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory terms, which could lead to a loss of properties and a decline in our natural gas and oil reserves.

Foreign Operations

Frontera's future revenues depend on operating results from its operations in the Republic of Georgia. The success of Frontera's operations is subject to various contingencies beyond management control. These contingencies include general and regional economic and political conditions, prices for crude oil, competition and changes in regulation. Frontera is subject to various additional political and economic uncertainties in Georgia which could include restrictions on transfer of funds, import and export duties, quotas and embargoes, domestic and international customs and tariffs, and changing taxation policies, foreign exchange restrictions, political conditions and regulations. The recent hostilities between Georgia and the Russian Federation over the separatist regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia may interrupt and adversely affect the Company's operations and ability to market production from Block 12, in particular if military operations escalate and extend to Frontera's operating areas. At present, the Company's operations are continuing without disruption. Frontera's business units within Block 12 are located approximately 100 miles or more east of South Ossetia. The Company is closely monitoring the situation and the international efforts to bring about a negotiated solution, and will take measures to secure worksites, assets and personnel as appropriate.

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Various statements contained in this management's discussion and analysis (MD&A), including those that express a belief, expectation, or intention, as well as those that are not statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements.  The forward-looking statements may include projections and estimates concerning the timing and success of specific projects and our future production, revenues, income and capital spending. Our forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as "estimate," "project," "predict," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "potential," "could," "may," "foresee," "plan," "goal" or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes.  The forward-looking statements in this MD&A speak only as of the date of this MD&A; we disclaim any obligation to update these statements unless required by securities law, and we caution you not to rely on them unduly. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and assumptions about future events.  While our management considers these expectations and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business, economic, political, competitive, regulatory and other risks, contingencies and uncertainties relating to, among other matters, the risks discussed under the heading "Risk Factors" and the following: