Blue Star Regulatory News (BLU)

8 March 2012

Blue Star Capital Plc

Final Results for the year ended 30 September 2011

Chairman's Statement

I am pleased to report Blue Star Capital Plc's ("Blue Star Capital" or "the Company") results for the year ended 30 September 2011.

On 18 June 2011, the Company announced the acquisition of one of its investee companies, Zimiti Limited ("Zimiti") (the "Acquisition") by Digital Barriers Plc (AIM:DGB).

Under the terms of the Acquisition, Digital Barriers acquired the entire issued share capital of Zimiti on a cash-free, debt-free basis for an initial consideration of £1.5 million in cash. Dependent on the successful satisfaction by Zimiti of certain financial and operational targets in the period from completion of the acquisition to 30 September 2013, further deferred consideration may be paid up to a maximum total consideration of £10.0m. This deferred consideration would be satisfied by the payment of a maximum of £4,250,000 in cash, with the balance satisfied through the issue of new Ordinary Shares in Digital Barriers.

Blue Star Capital's fully diluted holding in Zimiti of 22.85% was valued at £687,289 on the date of disposal. The consideration receivable from the sale has been calculated as £1,001,354 giving rise to a profit on disposal of £314,065. The Zimiti holding has been derecognised and contingent consideration has been recognised based on a 50% expectation of the NPV of the various earnout criteria being achieved and using a 10% discount rate. The initial cash consideration to Blue Star was £249,690 which was corrected to £200,917 during November 2011. The subsequent Digital Barriers shares to be received, where the number of shares to be issued is calculated from their prior five day average close price at that time, will be in "lock-in" for twelve months from each issue. The cash received will be utilised to progress the Company.

On 25 February 2011, the Company announced the full impairment of Pedagog Limited which went into administration in June 2011. No residual value is anticipated.

The Company retains its investment in one Homeland Security Industry (HSI) company, OmniPerception Limited and in two unquoted non core holdings: eSeekers and Medcenter Inc. We have had to fully impair the value of Medcenter which has experienced significant problems and taken steps to refinance.

On 1 February 2012, the Company announced that it had raised £245,000 before expenses (£232,750 net of expenses) via the issue of 12,250,000 new Ordinary Shares (the "Placing Shares") at a price of 2 pence per share ("Placing Price") to new and existing investors. The Placing Price was at a discount of 30.6% to the closing mid price of 2.88 pence per Ordinary Share on 30 January 2012. The proceeds were used to make a loan of £150,000 to Overtis Group Limited ("Overtis").

The purpose of the loan is to provide Overtis with working capital and to secure a period of exclusivity as part of a process which the Company expects, subject to due diligence, further fund raising and shareholder approvals, will lead to the full acquisition of the issued share capital of Overtis in line with the Company's stated investment policy.

Overtis is a software company and a provider of User Activity Management solutions. It is an expert in information protection and compliance and has significant potential in the cyber security and data security space. The company has patents on its software and expects to be profitable in its first full year of operations post acquisition, working closely with development partner BAE Systems and channel partners including Hitachi and Panasonic.

Its enterprise solutions detect and prevent data misuse, which could be unintentional, malicious or otherwise and ensures both compliance and a clear audit trail with low overhead. Loss or leakage of confidential information can thereby be prevented. Examples of enterprise deployments include a significant number of police forces and customers in the financial services sector. Its retail solutions monitor till operations at store checkouts to reduce losses, with customers including fast food chains such as Itsu. The company also has a cloud-based product in development to deliver security for web applications.

Blue Star Capital reported a loss for the year of £485,423 (2010: £2,174,470). Operating Loss was £469,186 (2010: £2,240,269)

Administration costs were in line with expectations at £640,134 (2010: £615,439)

Blue Star Capital, continues to plan to take advantage of the fast growing major multi-billion dollar markets based on products and technologies in homeland security. We continue to see robust and quality HSI related deal-flow in detection, identification, screening and location, materials, sensors, communications, electronics and computing.

There has been significant activity within our portfolio, which I set out below. The investment holdings are set out in note 14.

1. OMNIPERCEPTION LIMITED (www.omniperception.com)

Omniperception Limited ("Omniperception") has developed unique biometric and computer vision technology for applications such as secure access, machine-readable travel documents, identification and personalisation. This software is unique in that it can be deployed not just in security applications including the Police services but also in civilian areas including social networking and broadcast, as well as variants which allow automatic logo brand recognition and quantification in video imagery for high value advertising tracking. This fulfils our dual-use criteria in a total addressable market of over $4bn with face recognition representing some $500m.

OmniPerception has successfully commercialised world leading research from the University of Surrey's Centre for Vision, Speech and Signal Processing led by Professor Josef Kittler and the intellectual property rights are 100% owned in-house by the company. The company enjoys preferential access to a pipeline of innovation from the University of Surrey which continues to maintain its shareholding in the company. OmniPerception's products and solutions address its four current main active markets - Law Enforcement, Gaming & Leisure, Banking and the Airport sector.

Its products are in use by the UK Police Forces as well as chosen by certain high value installations for critical secure access applications. Whilst 2011 has seen some growth in the company's installed base within the Police sector, of more importance during this year has been the reported success for its niche, high security access control facial recognition product, CheckPoint. This product, which was first introduced into the airport sector in 2010, is now used to secure access to specific sensitive areas in many of the major airports in the UK. The continued success of a biometric enabled product in such mission critical applications provides a solid foundation for continued growth in the UK and beyond. The company aims to continue to target growth for facial recognition applications within the global airport security sector.

During 2011, the company also reported the successful launch of its unique covert facial recognition product called CheckPoint.S. This product is designed for the covert detection and automatic identification of "black-listed" people and has been proven to be more reliable than trained staff at detecting the presence of specific people. The product has been installed into numerous gaming and leisure installations in the UK and the company will, together with its partners, seek to maximise revenues of this product in the gaming and leisure market. The company also reports that CheckPoint.S has been selected as one component to covertly secure public areas within airports, thus underlining the strategic importance of this sector.

Aside from the OmniPerception's activities in the biometric and security sectors, the company provides valuable logo and brand exposure data for rights holders, advertising agencies and some of the world's major brand owners through its two subsidiary organisations AIR and Margaux Matrix. Both subsidiaries have demonstrated considerable resistance to the general downturn in the UK and AIR specifically has established new licencees further afield in Russia, USA and Slovenia. Of considerable promise in terms of revenue growth, AIR also reports its first successes outside its core market of sport brand exposure. Its image analysis product, Magellan, has been successfully used to assist the UK Police in analysing footage from the London riots in 2011 where it has been used to detect and track specific individuals using their clothing.

The company is chaired by me, and Dr Richard Leaver was a Non Executive Director by virtue of Blue Star's investment in the company until 22 March 2011. Subsequently Dr Richard Leaver has moved to become a board observer, following a £730,000 funding round at that point in which Blue Star Capital was not in a position to participate.

Blue Star invested a further £7,282 in December 2011 as part of a smaller funding round.

2. ESEEKERS LIMITED (www.sharenow.com)

Blue Star Capital has a minority holding in eSeekers Limited ("eSeekers"), which is a private limited company registered in England and Wales.

eSeekers is in the process of relocating its operations to Gibraltar. Implicit in that move is the formation of a new Group Holding Company, Xen Limited ("XenL"). Once the relocation process is complete, XenL will have equity holdings in three independent but synergistic Internet businesses.

The core element of the holdings is Xen, Inc. (www.xen.com - "Xen"), which operates from offices in Los Angeles and it is developing a platform that is designed to radically change the way in which the web of data that exists on the Internet can be viewed by everyone.

Xen, which is wholly owned by eSeekers, has just over 140 discrete developments in the company's technical roadmap that have started to be rolled out in the last two months. The rollout will continue throughout 2012.

The other two holdings are in Nektan Limited, which develops and operates skill and social games for lottery operators and on its own brand platforms, and in VNU Capital LLC, which owns and operates an online retail platform that allows consumers to acquire luxury goods using a variety of credit programs that are run by partner lenders.

3. MEDCENTER HOLDINGS INC (www.medcentersolutions.com www.medcenter.com)

Medcenter is a multinational pharmaceutical marketing company specialising in innovative solutions to increase drug sales and business effectiveness. Blue Star Capital owns a minority stake in this private company.

We have had to fully impair the value of Medcenter which has experienced significant problems and taken steps to refinance.

Financials

Blue Star Capital has continued reduce costs wherever possible, both in its cost base and ongoing investment operations. The Company's cash position at the end of the year was £276,764 (2010: £27,065).

The CEO, Dr Richard Leaver elected to receive 25% of his salary in the Company's shares from 1 July 2011. Anthony Fabrizi and Noel Lyons received all their fees in the Company's shares from the date of joining the Board (28 April 2011) and myself, General Sir Michael Wilkes and Peter Varnish have agreed to receive our fees likewise from 1 October 2011.

Outlook

The acquisition of Overtis is a major step forward in the Company's strategy to invest in promising security based companies and we anticipate further acquisitions to follow. Our remaining key HSI investment, OmniPerception continues to exhibit potential and is well positioned to deliver returns to the Blue Star Capital portfolio during 2012 and beyond. Furthermore, eSeekers is performing well and we expect good growth from this company without requiring further cash outlay.

The Lord Dear

Chairman

Date 7 March 2012

Results and dividends

The directors present their report together with the audited financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2011.

The statement of comprehensive income is set out below and shows the result for the year. The directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend (2010: £nil)

Principal activities & review of the business

The principal activity of the Company is to invest in Homeland Security Industry based companies which have dual use products and applications (those inclusive of both defence and civilian markets). A review of the business is included within the Chairman's Statement.

Directors serving during the year

General Sir Michael Wilkes, Lord Dear, Dr Richard Leaver, Peter Varnish all served as directors during the year. Anthony Fabrizi and Noel Lyons both joined the Board on 28 April 2011.

Directors' Interests

The Directors at the date of these financial statements who served and their interest in the ordinary shares of the Company are as follows:

Investing Policy

Assets or Companies in which the Company can invest

The principal activity of the Company is to invest in Homeland Security Industry based companies which have dual use products and applications (those inclusive of both defence and civilian markets). These include:

·; Security & Surveillance - including overt/covert autonomous face & voice recognition;

·; Explosives Detection Systems;

·; Surveillance, Border & Perimeter Security Systems;

·; Bio-Terror: Detection, Diagnostics & Treatment;

·; Training & Simulation Systems;

·; Access Control/Biometrics;

·; People Screening;

·; Cyber Security & Data Security;

·; Container Screening;

·; Emergency Planning and Integrated Response Systems.

The Company also holds a small number of investments in investee companies in other sectors.

The Company's geographical range is mainly UK companies but considers opportunities in the mainland EU and will actively co-invest in larger deals.

The Company can take positions in investee companies by way of equity, debt or convertible or hybrid securities.

Whether investments will be active or passive investments

The Company's investments are passive in nature, but may be actively managed. The Company may be represented on, or observe, the boards of its investee companies.

Holding period for investments

The Company's investments are likely to be illiquid and consequently are to be held for the medium to long term.

Spread of investments and maximum exposure limits, Policy in relation to cross-holdings and Investing Restrictions

The Company does not have any maximum exposure limits, limits on cross-holdings or other investing restrictions. It is the Directors intention not to invest more than 10% of the Company's gross assets in any individual company (calculated at the time of investment).

Policy in relation to gearing

The Directors may exercise the powers of the Company to borrow money and to give security over its assets. The Company may also be indirectly exposed to the effects of gearing to the extent that investee companies have outstanding borrowings.

Returns and Distribution Policy

It is anticipated that returns from the Company's investment portfolio will arise upon realisation or sale of its investee companies, rather than from dividends received. Whilst it is not possible to determine the timing of exits, the Board will seek to return capital to shareholders when appropriate.

Life of the Company

The Company has an indefinite life.

Future Developments

The Company is continuing to develop an investment portfolio in the Homeland Security sector with a focus on prevention, protection, reaction and recovery. However the financial climate continues to place unforeseen pressures on the ability of our portfolio companies and ourselves to raise funds. This has been seen with the impairment of Pedagog and very recently with Medcenter and the Company's strategy, commencing with Overtis, is to acquire companies with strong revenues which will both mitigate its burn rate and free up funds for supporting and extending the portfolio. We are actively working to exit some of our investments for potentially significant returns, as the normal investment cycle progresses.

Principal risks and uncertainties

The Company is focussed in Homeland Security, which embraces a number of application sectors rather than being a vertical and undifferentiated narrow sector of itself. It seeks investments in late stage dual usage opportunities, which by their very nature allow a diverse portfolio of investments with different application sectors and geographic locations whilst maintaining the overarching Homeland Security focus. The risk is loss or impairment of investments.

 This is mitigated by careful management of the investment and in particular, only continuing to support those investments which demonstrate potential to achieve a positive exit and decisively determining those which do not. Portfolio and capital management techniques are fully applied according to industry standard practice.

It may be necessary to raise additional funds in the future by a further issue of new Ordinary Shares or by other means. However the ability to fund future investments and overheads in Blue Star Capital Plc as well as the ability of investments to return suitable profit cannot be guaranteed, particularly in the current economic climate. Blue Star Capital Plc is dependent on a small key manager team; however this is mitigated by a very active and experienced group of non-executive directors which complement the management.

The Company may not be able to identify suitable investment opportunities and there is no guarantee that investment opportunities will be available and the Company may incur costs in conducting due diligence into potential investment opportunities that may not result in an investment being made.

The value of publicly traded companies similar to those in Blue Star Capital's portfolio and in particular those at an early stage of development, can be highly volatile. The price at which investments are made, and the price which the Company may realise for its investment, will be influenced by a large number of factors, some specific to the Company and its operations and some which may affect the sector.

Significant shareholders

As at 5 March 2012 so far as the directors are aware, the parties (other than the interests held by Directors) who are directly or indirectly interested in 3% or more of the nominal value of the Company's share capital is as follows:

General 

The Company has third party Directors and Officers indemnity insurance in place.

Related party transactions

The Company has entered into certain related party transactions and these are disclosed in note 22.

Post balance sheet events 

Events subsequent to the balance sheet date are detailed in note 20 to the financial statements

Policy and practice on the payment of creditors

The Company has no formal code or standard, which deals specifically with the payment of suppliers. However, the Company's policy on the payment of all creditors is to ensure that the terms of payment, as specified and agreed with the supplier, are not exceeded. At the year end, trade creditors represented 77 days purchases (2010: 39 days).

Donations

There were no charitable or political donations during the current or prior year.

Auditors

All of the current directors have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any information needed by the company's auditors for the purposes of their audit and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information. The directors are not aware of any relevant audit information of which the auditors are unaware.

BDO LLP resigned as auditors and Adler Shine LLP were appointed in their place. Adler Shine LLP has expressed their willingness to continue in office and a resolution to re‑appoint them will be proposed at the Annual General Meeting.

On behalf of the board of directors

Dr Richard Leaver

Chief Executive Officer

Directors' responsibilities

The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors have elected to prepare the company financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union. Under company law the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of the profit or loss of the company for that period. The directors are also required to prepare financial statements in accordance with the rules of the London Stock Exchange for companies trading securities on the Alternative Investment Market.

In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:

·; select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

·; make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

·; state whether they have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;

·; prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business.

The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

Website publication

The directors are responsible for ensuring the annual report and the financial statements are made available on a website. Financial statements are published on the company's website in accordance with legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements, which may vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance and integrity of the company's website is the responsibility of the directors. The directors' responsibility also extends to the ongoing integrity of the financial statements contained therein.

We have audited the financial statements of Blue Star Capital Plc for the year ended 30 September 2011, which comprise the Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Statement of Financial Position, the Statement of Changes in Equity, the Cash Flow Statement and the related notes. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union.

This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an Auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors

As explained more fully in the statement of directors' responsibilities set out below, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board's (APB's) Ethical Standards for Auditors.

Scope of the audit of the financial statements

An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the company's circumstances and have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors; and the overall presentation of the financial statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in the annual report to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements. If we become aware of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report.

Opinion on financial statements

In our opinion the financial statements:

·; give a true and fair view of the state of the company's affairs as at 30 September 2011 and of the company's result for the year then ended;

·; have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union; and

·; have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

Emphasis of matter - Going concern

In forming our opinion, which is not qualified, we have considered the adequacy of the disclosures made in note 1 to the financial statements concerning the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The going concern assumption is predicated on the receipt of funds from a fundraising and from the sale of certain investments in order to fund working capital and the repayment of the shareholder loan. The receipt of these funds is not yet certain. These conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include the adjustments that would result if the Company were unable to continue as a going concern.

Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006

In our opinion the information given in the directors' report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements.

Matters on which we are required to report by exception

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters where the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:

·; adequate accounting records have not been kept by the company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or

·; the company financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or

·; certain disclosures of directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or

·; we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.

Christopher Taylor (Senior Statutory Auditor)

For and on behalf of Adler Shine LLP, statutory auditor

Aston House

Cornwall Avenue

London N3 1LF

Date

Adler Shine LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number OC301724).

Blue Star Capital Plc

Statement of Comprehensive Income

for the year ended 30 September 2011

The loss for the year was derived from continuing operations and is attributable to equity shareholdings.

Blue Star Capital Plc

Statement of Financial Position

for the year ended 30 September 2011

The financial statements were approved by the board and authorised for issue on 7 March 2012 and were signed on its behalf by:

Dr Richard Leaver

Chief Executive Officer

Registered number: 05174441

Blue Star Capital Plc

Statement of Changes in Equity

for the year ended 30 September 2011

Share Capital

Share capital represents the nominal value on the issue of the Company's equity share capital, comprising £0.001 ordinary shares.

Share Premium

Share premium represents the amount subscribed for the Company's equity share capital in excess of nominal value.

Retained Earnings

Retained earnings represent the cumulative net income and losses of the Company recognised through the statement of comprehensive income along with the fair value of the equity settled share based payments.

Blue Star Capital Plc

Cash Flow Statement

for the year ended 30 September 2011

Blue Star Capital Plc

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the year ended 30 September 2011

1. Accounting policies

Basis of preparation

The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the financial statements are set out below. The policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, International Accounting Standards and Interpretations (collectively IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) as adopted by the European Union ("adopted IFRSs").

Going concern

The financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which assumes that the company will be able to meet its liabilities as they fall due.

The Company entered into a shareholder loan agreement on 28 April 2011 with certain existing shareholders. These shareholders have loaned the Company £400,000. The shareholder loan, together with the accrued 10% interest, is due for repayment by 30 May 2012.

The Company has sold its investment in Zimiti Limited. Part of the consideration receivable is contingent on certain criteria being satisfied. The Directors have a reasonable expectation that the criteria will be satisfied.

As announced on 1 February 2012, the Company is in a period of exclusivity with Overtis Limited which, subject to due diligence, further fund raising and shareholder approvals, will lead to the full acquisition of the issued share capital of that company.

The amount to be realised from the sale of Zimiti and the fundraising exercise in order to complete the acquisition of Overtis may or may not provide sufficient funds to cover the repayment of the above shareholder loan by 30 May 2012 and the on-going working capital needs of the Company. Should the contingent consideration not be received or should the fundraising not be successful, the Company would need to obtain alternative finance. The Directors are confident that they will be able to achieve this, although it has not yet been explored.

These conditions constitute a material uncertainty that may cast doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not contain the adjustments that would result if the Company were unable to continue as a going concern.

Property, plant and equipment 

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses.

The charge for depreciation is calculated to write down the cost of tangible fixed assets to their estimated residual values over their expected useful lives as follows:

Plant and machinery 25 % straight line

Fixture and fittings 25 % straight line

Motor vehicles 25 % straight line

Impairment provisions are made where carrying value of tangible fixed assets exceeds the recoverable amount.

Financial assets

The Company classifies its financial assets into one of the categories discussed below, depending on the purpose for which the asset was acquired. The Company has not classified any of its financial assets as held to maturity or available for sale.

The Company's accounting policy for each category is as follows;

1. Accounting policies (continued)

Fair value through profit or loss

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are either financial assets held for trading or other investments that have been designated at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition.

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value and any gains or losses arising from subsequent changes in fair value are presented in the statement of comprehensive income in the period in which they arise.

The fair value of unlisted securities is established using International Private Equity and Venture Capital ("IPEVC") guidelines. The valuation methodology used most commonly by the Company is the 'price of recent investment' contained in the IPEVC valuation guidelines. The following considerations are used when calculating the fair value using the 'price of recent investment' guidelines:

·; Where the investment being valued was itself made recently, its cost will generally provide a good indication of fair value;

·; Where there has been any recent investment by third parties, the price of that investment will provide a basis of the valuation;

·; If there is no readily ascertainable value from following the 'price of recent investment' methodology, the company considers alternative methodologies in the IPEVC guidelines, being principally discounted cash flows and price earnings multiples requiring management to make assumptions over the timing and nature of future earnings and cash flows when calculating fair value;

·; Where a fair value cannot be readily estimated the investment is reported at the carrying value at the previous reporting date unless there is evidence that the investment has been impaired.

Loans and receivables

The Company's loans and receivables comprise cash and cash investment in the balance sheet and loans receivable from third parties.

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

For the purpose of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash equivalents as defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.

Loans receivable from third parties are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.

Financial liabilities

The Company classifies its financial liabilities in the category of financial liabilities measured at amortised cost. The Company does not have any financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss.

Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost:

Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost include:

Trade payables and other short-term monetary liabilities, which are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method

Finance income

Finance income relates to interest income arising on cash and cash equivalents held on deposit and interest accrued on loans receivable. Finance income is accrued on a time basis, by reference to the principal outstanding and at the effective interest rate applicable.

1. Accounting policies (continued)

Leased assets

Where substantially all of the risks and rewards incidental to ownership are not transferred to the group (an "operating lease"), the total rentals payable under the lease are charged to the statement of comprehensive income on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The aggregate benefit of lease incentives is recognised as a reduction of the rental expense over the lease term on a straight-line basis.

Pension costs

Company contributions to defined contribution pension schemes are charged to the statement of comprehensive income in the period in which they become payable.

Operating loss

Operating loss is stated after crediting all items of operating income and charging all items of operating expense, but before recognising the Company's share of the results of associated undertakings.

Foreign currency

The functional and presentational currency of the Company is Sterling, which is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates.

Foreign currency transactions are translated into sterling at the rate of exchange at the date of the transaction. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation of foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities at the year end rate are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.

Foreign currency gains or losses arising on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are included in the statement of comprehensive income in fair value gains or losses.

Deferred taxation

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised where the carrying amount of an asset or liability in the balance sheet differs from its tax base.

Recognition of deferred tax assets is restricted to those instances where it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the difference can be utilised.

The amount of the asset or liability is determined using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the deferred tax liabilities/ (assets) are settled/ (recovered).

Share-based payments

Where equity settled share options are awarded to employees, the fair value of the options at the date of grant is charged to the statement of comprehensive income over the vesting period.

Provisions

Provisions are recognised when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that the Company will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.

The amount recognised as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. When a provision is measured using the cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation, its carrying amount is the present value of the cash flows (when the effect of the time value of money is material).

1. Accounting policies (continued)

When some or all of the economic benefits required to settle a provision are expected to be recovered from a third party, a receivable is recognised as an asset if it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received and the amount of the receivable can be measured reliably.

Present obligations under onerous leases are recognised and measured as provisions. An onerous contract is considered to exist where the company has a contract under which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received from the contract.

Standards, Amendments and Interpretations in issue not yet effective

The Company has not applied the following new and revised IFRSs that have been issued but are not yet effective:

The directors anticipate that the adoption of these standards and interpretations in future periods will have no material impact on the financial statements other than in terms of presentation.

2. Critical accounting estimates and judgements

The Company makes certain estimates and assumptions regarding the future. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. In the future, actual experience may differ from these estimates and assumptions. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed in note 3 below.

3. Fair value of financial instruments

The Company holds other investments that have been designated at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition. The Company determines the fair value of these financial instruments that are not quoted, using valuation techniques such as Black Scholes option pricing. These techniques are significantly affected by certain key assumptions, such as discount rates. Other valuation methodologies such as discounted cash flow analysis assess estimates of future cash flows and it is important to recognise that in that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot always be substantiated by comparison with independent markets and, in many cases, may not be capable of being realised immediately.

In certain circumstances, where fair value cannot be readily established, the Company is required to make judgements over carrying value impairment, and evaluate the size of any impairment required.

The methods and assumptions applied, and the valuation techniques used, are disclosed in note 14.

4. Estimate of the fair value of contingent consideration

The Company has contingent consideration receivable on the disposal of certain unquoted investments. This has been designated at fair value based upon the discounted cash flows of the expected receivable using a post-tax discount rate.

The methods and assumptions applied, and the valuation techniques used, are disclosed in note 15.

5. Operating loss

6. Finance Income

7. Finance costs

8. Share based payment

The Company operates unapproved scheme for executive directors and employees, and a corresponding unapproved scheme for non executive directors. Under both unapproved schemes, one third of the options vest if the average share price of the Company exceeds 6p for three consecutive months; similarly one third vest if its average share price exceeds 9p for three consecutive months and the final third vest if the average share price exceeds 12p for three consecutive months.

The exercise price of options outstanding at the end of the year was 4.5p (2010: 4.5p) and their weighted average contractual life was 4 years (2010: 5 years).

Of the total number of options outstanding at the end of the year, nil (2010: nil) had vested and were exercisable at the end of the year.

The following information is relevant in the determination of the fair value of options granted during the year under the equity share based remuneration schemes operated by the Company.

The volatility assumption, measured at the standard deviation of expected share price returns, is based on a statistical analysis of daily share prices over the Company's life.

The Black-Scholes valuation technique was adopted because, in the opinion of the directors, the market based vesting conditions were not materially sensitive to the valuation.

Share warrants

The Company entered into a shareholder loan agreement on 28 April 2011 with certain existing shareholders. The arrangement also included the issue of 15,000,000 warrants to subscribe for ordinary shares at £0.02 pence per share, exercisable at any time within the next two years. The charge to the profit and loss account for the current year is £52,665; with the anticipated charge for 2012 of £70,558.

8. Share based payment (continued)

The exercise price of warrants outstanding at the end of the year was 2p (2010: n/a) and their weighted average contractual life was 3 years (2010: n/a).

Of the total number of warrants outstanding at the end of the year, nil (2010: n/a) had vested and were exercisable at the end of the year.

The following information is relevant in the determination of the fair value of warrants granted during the year under the equity share based remuneration schemes operated by the Company.

The volatility assumption, measured at the standard deviation of expected share price returns, is based on a statistical analysis of daily share prices over a three year period.

The Black-Scholes valuation technique was adopted because, in the opinion of the directors, the market based vesting conditions were not materially sensitive to the valuation.

The share-based expense (note 5) comprises:

9. Staff Costs including directors

During the year the company had an average of 2 employees who were both administrative (2010 - 2). One of the employees was both the director and the key management personnel of the company.

10. Directors' and key management personnel

There was one director in the Company's defined contribution pension scheme during the year (2010 - 1).

The value of the share options were computed using the Black Scholes option pricing methodology, with a 5 year volatility of 78% and evenly divided over the five year period from issue (6 October 2009).

11. Factors affecting the tax charge

The tax assessed on loss before tax for the year differs to the applicable rate of corporation tax in the UK for small companies of 20.5% (2010: 21%). The differences are explained below:

The Company has incurred tax losses for the period and a corporation tax expense is not anticipated. The amount of the unutilised tax losses has not been recognised in the financial statements as the recovery of this benefit is dependent on future profitability, the timing of which cannot be reasonably foreseen. The unrecognised deferred tax asset at 30 September 2011 is £459,452 (2010: £311,349).

12. Loss per ordinary share

The calculation of basic loss per share of £0.32p (2010: loss per share of £1.45p) is based on the loss for the year after tax of £485,423 (2010: loss of £2,174,470) and on the weighted average number of shares in issue during the period of 150,260,935 (2010:150,260,935).

The share options in issue do not have any dilutive effect at the year-end date.

13. Property, Plant & Equipment

14. Other investments

The above investments were split as follows

All of the above investments are incorporated in the United Kingdom barring Medcenter Holdings Inc, which is a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. The methods used to value these unquoted investments are described below.

Fair value

The fair value of unquoted investments is established using valuation techniques. These include the use of recent arm's length transactions, the Black-Scholes option pricing model and discounted cash flow analysis. Where a fair value cannot be estimated reliably the investment is reported at the carrying value at the previous reporting date in accordance with International Private Equity and Venture Capital ("IPEVC") guidelines.

The Company holds convertible loan notes that have been designated at fair value through profit or loss on initial recognition. Any changes in fair value are recognised through the fair value gains/ (losses) line in the statement of comprehensive income.

The Company also holds convertible loan notes where at inception, the option to convert to equity at a future point in time is valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The residual amount represents a loan receivable.

14. Other investments (continued)

The option is then fair valued at each reporting date, with any fair value gains/ (losses) recognised through the fair value gains/ (losses) line in the statement of comprehensive income. The loan receivable is measured at amortised cost, with any interest income recognised as finance income through the statement of comprehensive income using the effective interest rate method.

In the case of convertible loan notes where the fair value of the option cannot be separated and measured in a reliable manner, the instrument is recognised as a single financial asset at fair value through profit or loss.

The Company assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is any objective evidence that the unquoted investments are impaired. The unquoted investments are deemed to be impaired, if and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that have occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (an incurred 'loss event') and that loss event (or events) has an impact on the estimated future fair value of the investments that can be reliably measured.

15. Trade and other receivables

The directors consider that the carrying value of trade and other receivables approximates to their fair value.

Included within other receivables is an amount of £800,436 (2010: £nil) relating to contingent consideration receivable on the disposal of Zimiti Limited. The fair value of the contingent consideration is based upon the discounted cash flows of the expected receivable using a post-tax discount rate of 10%. The Directors have assessed the fair value of the deferred consideration receivable to be £970,000 and consequently this figure has been used in the calculation of discounted fair value.

16. Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at bank and other short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. The directors consider that the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates to their fair value.

17. Trade and other payables

All trade and other payables fall due for payment within one year. The directors consider that the carrying value of trade and other payables approximates to their fair value.

18. Borrowings

The Company entered into a shareholder loan agreement on 28 April 2011 with certain existing shareholders. These shareholders have loaned the Company £400,000. The shareholder loan, together with the accrued 10% interest, is due for repayment by 30 May 2012.

The shareholder loan is secured by an all assets debenture granted by the Company and the arrangement also included the issue of 15,000,000 warrants to subscribe for ordinary shares at £0.02 pence per share, exercisable at any time within the next two years.

19. Share capital

20. Post balance sheet events

From 1 October 2011, Lord Dear, General Sir Michael Wilkes and Peter Varnish elected to take all their fees in the Company's shares alongside existing share based payments to the other directors.

The following shares were issued on 20 January 2012 in respect of announced share based payments due to the end of December 2011:

Lord Dear - 210,084 shares

Dr Richard Leaver - 248,169 shares

Anthony Fabrizi - 157,563 shares

Noel Lyons - 157,563 shares

Peter Varnish - 157,563 shares

General Sir Michael Wilkes - 157,563 shares,

A total number shares of 1,088,505.

20 Post balance sheet events (continued)

On 14 December 2011, the Company invested £7,282 in a further funding round in OmniPerception.

On 1 February 2012, the Company announced that it had raised £245,000 before expenses (£232,750 net of expenses) via the issue of 12,250,000 new Ordinary Shares (the "Placing Shares") at a price of 2 pence per share ("Placing Price") to new and existing investors. The Placing Price was at a discount of 30.6% to the closing mid price of 2.88 pence per Ordinary Share on 30 January 2012. The proceeds were used to make a loan of £150,000 to Overtis Group Limited ("Overtis").

The purpose of the loan is to provide Overtis with working capital and to secure a period of exclusivity as part of a process which the Company expects, subject to due diligence, further fund raising and shareholder approvals, will lead to the full acquisition of the issued share capital of Overtis in line with the Company's stated investment policy.

Overtis is a software company and a provider of User Activity Management solutions. It is an expert in information protection and compliance and has significant potential in the cybersecurity and data security space. The company has patents on its software and expects to be profitable in its first full year of operations post acquisition, working closely with development partner BAE Systems and channel partners including Hitachi and Panasonic.

Its enterprise solutions detect and prevent data misuse, which could be unintentional, malicious or otherwise and ensures both compliance and a clear audit trail with low overhead. Loss or leakage of confidential information can thereby be prevented. Examples of enterprise deployments include a significant number of police forces and customers in the financial services sector. Its retail solutions monitor till operations at store checkouts to reduce losses, with customers including fast food chains such as Itsu. The company also has a cloud-based product in development to deliver security for web applications.

From 1 October 2011, the Company has entered into a 6 month rental agreement with Daniel Andrews Property Management at a monthly rent of £900 per month for the rental of temporary office space.

21. Financial instruments

Categories of financial assets and liabilities

The following tables set out the categories of financial instruments held by the company:

21. Financial instruments (continued)

The Company's financial instruments comprise other investments held for trading, cash and cash equivalents and trade payables that arise directly from the company's operations. The main purpose of these instruments is to invest in these companies. Investments held for trading and other investments have been held at fair value through profit and loss. The main risks arising from holding these financial instruments is market risk and credit risk. Market risk is also examined in post balance sheet events (note 20).

Interest rate risk

The Company's exposure to changes in interest rates relate primarily to cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents is held either on current or on short term deposits at floating rates of interest determined by the relevant bank's prevailing base rate. The Company seeks to obtain a favourable interest rate on its cash balances through the use of bank treasury deposits. Any reasonable change in interest rate would not have a material impact on finance income that the Company could receive in the course of a year, based on the current level of cash and cash equivalents either held in current accounts or short term deposits.

Market risk

All trading instruments are subject to market risk, the potential that future changes in market conditions may make an instrument less valuable, due to fluctuations in security prices, as well as interest and foreign exchange rates. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded.

Sensitivity analysis

The following table looks at the impact on net result and net assets based on a given movement in the fair value of all the investments;

10% movement either way will result in £182,231 profit or (loss)

20% movement either way will result in £364,462 profit or (loss)

30% movement either way will result in £546,693 profit or (loss)

Currency risk

The Company's foreign currency risk is limited to two convertible loan notes and two equity investments denominated in US Dollars. The total value of these investments in US Dollars at the balance sheet date was $nil (2010: $860,255). A 10% increase or decrease in the $/£ exchange rate would have a £nil (2010: £55,917) impact on net result for the year and net assets, based on the rate prevailing at 30 September 2011.

21. Financial instruments (continued)

Liquidity risks

The Company seeks to manage liquidity risk by ensuring sufficient liquid assets are available to meet foreseeable needs and to invest liquid funds safely and profitably. All cash balances are immediately accessible and the Company holds no trades payable that mature in greater than 3 months, hence a contractual maturity analysis of financial liabilities has not been presented. Since these financial liabilities all mature within 3 months, the directors believe that their carrying value reasonably equates to fair value.

Borrowing facilities

The operations to date have been financed through the placing of shares and loans and it is Board policy to keep borrowing to a minimum where possible.

Credit risk

The Company's credit risk is attributable to cash held on deposit at financial institutions.

Cash is deposited with reputable financial institutions with a high credit rating. The maximum credit risk relating to cash and cash equivalents is equal to their carrying value of £276,764 (2010: £27,065).

The maximum credit risk relating to a loan receivable is equal to its carrying value of £nil (2010: £1,091,747).

The maximum credit risk relating to convertible loan notes is equal to 125% of the face value of the loan, being the amount that would be received on redemption of $nil (2010: $295,869).

Trade receivables arise as a result of day to day operations and at year end the company's maximum exposure to credit risk on trade receivables is £11,520 (2010: £ 8,791).

Capital Disclosure

As in previous years, the Company defines capital as issued capital, reserves and retained earnings as disclosed in statement of changes in equity. The Company manages its capital and debt to ensure that it will be able to continue to pursue strategic investments and continue as a going concern. The Company does not have any externally imposed financial requirements.

22. Related party transactions

Dr Richard Leaver was a director of Zimiti Limited (until 17 June 2011), a director of OmniPerception Limited (until 22 March 2011) and Pedagog Limited (until 25 February 2011) in order to represent the interests of the investors.

Lord Dear, chairman of Blue Star Capital, is also a director of OmniPerception Limited.

Dr Richard Leaver is a partner in PegasusBridge Fund Management LLP. As part of the Asset Purchase Agreement between Blue Star Capital and PegasusBridge Fund Management Limited, PegasusBridge Fund Management LLP invoiced monthly monitoring fees from Zimiti Limited of £1,500 per month (2010: £1,500 per month), OmniPerception Limited £700 per month (2010: £700 per month) and Pedagog Limited £1,500 per month (2010: £1,500 per month).

Dr Richard Leaver, Noel Lyons and Anthony Fabrizi were issued 209,815, 140,848 and 140,848 shares in the Company on 1 November 2011 respectively for announced share based payments accruing during the year.

Peter Varnish (as Closed Solutions Limited), was paid a total of £20,295 during the year in respect of director's fees and expenses (2010: £21,545)

General Sir Michael Wilkes (as Marbral Limited) was paid a total of £15,090 during the year in respect of director's fees and expenses. (2010: £15,000)

22. Related party transactions (continued)

During the year, Blue Star Capital made further investments as convertible loans in Zimiti Limited £nil (2010: £15,000) and OmniPerception Limited £nil (2010: £30,000).

Included in the £413,714 of long term borrowings is £51,479 relating to a loan and and the subsequent accrued interest due to Phoenix Opportunities Limited, a company in which Noel Lyons is a director.

Also during the year, Blue Star Capital gave a short term loan to Pedagog of £nil (2010: £17,000) at an interest rate of 10 % per annum. The loan was due to be paid by 31 January 2011 but our current view since the impairment of Pedagog, is that it is unlikely to be repaid.

23. Operating lease commitments

At the balance sheet date the company has outstanding commitments under operating leases of which the total future minimum lease payments were due as follows:

The Company has entered into a lease agreement with The Portman Estate, which is due to expire on 8 September 2014 with a three year breakpoint (8 September 2012) inclusive of a rent deposit of £20,346, at an annual rent of £35,385 for the rental of office premises.

There is a rent deposit deed in favour of The Portman Estate.

24. Ultimate Controlling Party

The Company considers that there is no ultimate controlling party.