Member Info for zumore

Yes i'm sure tomorrow it will rise. :)

No need to respond. But it must have filled you with relief when the awful Andrew departed; then deflated you when you realised how many PIs dislike James Parsons. Let's be honest those who dislike Andrew could stop posting on lse but this thread would still be full with posters who dislike James Parsons.

I'm only being nosey.

Also remember when the PJ coal pump was happening a few years back this tripled in price. Many non positive RGM posters were posting on this thread back then. So i guess if it's going to rise it will rise. People whinge too much about posters. I suspect every big fall at RGM happened these past few years was because Bell and Kaintz overamped and ultimately let RGM shareholders down.

What percentage will you have from tomorrow?

On the FCA i'm sure you don't mean that Stephen. Imagine many familiar names would probably be on the inside: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RK1iAwlhsnQ

Hi Patridge. It was actually Brokermandaniel: https://twitter.com/BrokermanDaniel/status/1201820113680445440

But we could all see what Doc Holiday, Stephen Pearce and others were doing by trying to manipulate the price on twitter by creating fiction. Bear in mind you could say that 16% RGM shareholder Stephen Pearce was sat on price sensitive company information because he knew how he would vote but he was trying to trick others by making out he would vote against the resolutions. Of course he didn't. So very low of him.

I know people say the FCA are weak and don't care about AIM manipulation. But if they weren't Stephen they would be all over you (and others) from that RGM twitter thread the other week.

Simple facts are you were the 16% RGM shareholder. You knew you would vote through the resolutions but you were making out to investors on twitter that you may not. A 16% shareholder has great influence. You knew that!!

So please don't make out your whiter than white by threatening booboo.

on lse you can make posts that can give "strong buy opinions" and you can also make posts that give "strong sell opinions"?

I've only become aware of you on lse this past month and you seem to make hundreds of needless posts moaning about other posters posts you don't like. You seem totally unaware that posters can make posts on lse that don't praise the company or the management: in other words a "strong sell post"

You can save yourself hundreds of needless posts a month if you can get that into your head.

Here is that RGM ramp thread on twitter:

https://mobile.twitter.com/spearce999/status/1204846916397387777

I hardly think you've conducted yourself well on twitter these past few weeks Stephen. I'm sure many would think that you being the 16% RGM largest shareholder you were trying to manipulate the RGM share price (luring in wet behind the ears investors) by giving the impression you might vote down the resolutions at todays RGM general meeting and thus create a short squeeze that would force the forward sellers to buy back their forward sold RGM placing shares on the open market, which would in turn rocket the RGM share price.

Here was some of your RGM exchanges on twitter.

Doc Holiday tweets: "Imagine if the major holders BLOCKED THE GM . I wonder do you know any of the major shareholders???

Stephen Pearce tweets: "Oh man, could you imagine.. With approx 120% of the entire share capital traded in the last few days already, how much of that has been forward sold, and how much would have to be bought back"

Oneup tweets: "Think some have positioned and are now hyping the ifs and maybes, in an attempt to maximise their out. Short squeeze! FFS look at the amount in circulation. It won't get voted down. Keep it honest chaps"

Stephen Pearce tweets: "Well.... Considering they're special resolutions. I could kill it off on my own"
.....................

You were definitely trying to manipulate the RGM share price because with you being a 16% RGM shareholder you were giving the misleading impression you might vote down todays resolutions. Clearly you didn't vote them down.

It looks like James tried to bury that Mambare bad news in the general meeting RNS. Sneakily no mention of Mambare in the RNS title instead it reads "Result of GM, Board Changes, Consolidation & TVR".

Plus he isn't going into much detail of what the issue with the Mambare JV partner is. So I guess you could say withholding price sensitive information from investors.

So definitely not impressed with the new guy in charge.

I think you'll be happy on Tuesday because RGM share price will probably be between 2p to 2.5p. :)

When I said:

"But i do sense you are annoying the two Stephen's by telling them that's it's highly likely RGM now only have a tiny stake in Mambare"

Of course I'm not bothered if they would be unhappy. You probably are correct.

was purchased by HZM for $2 million. HZM pay another $6 million if it goes into production.

Previous owners VALE spent an estimated $200 million on Vermelho and drilled over 152,000 metres.
................

Mambare has had around 8.000 metres drilled. It has a lowly inferred resource.

You would think mining giants would value Mambare pretty worthless. I'm sure they would think virtually nothing has been done there.

Booboo, you misunderstood my post. When i said:

"Apart from money the unknowledgeable RGM management seem of little use to the Mambare JV partners"

I meant that money was all that RGM would have to offer the JV partners. I didn't mean RGM had been giving the JV partners money.

Like i said the other day you seem to like Mambare. I on the other hand do not. I don't think it will ever be producing . I rate it worthless. On a scale of 0 to 100 my enthusiasm for it is 0. On the other hand the two Stephen's are with you and also rate Mambare. But i do sense you are annoying the two Stephen's by telling them that's it's highly likely RGM now only have a tiny stake in Mambare.

"Regency owns liquid assets that it can sell to fund operations, the most significant being its 8.55% stake in Curzon Energy Plc, listed on the Standard List of the London Stock Exchange (LSE:CZN) The value of this holding, following in Q4 2019, was approximately £53,000"

Your posts are persuading me booboo.

Apart from money the unknowledgeable RGM management seem of little use to the Mambare JV partners.

"Regency's general inability to access the capital markets since the 25 of January 2019 has further exacerbated this situation, with Regency's capital contributions to the project having fallen behind that of its JV partners. The Company currently estimates that a deficit funding situation with its JV partners of approximately $565,000 thus currently exists. Regency's ability to support its obligated share of required investments into MET remains uncertain over the short term."

Believe what you want to believe Stephen. I can remember the days when you used to heap praise on Saradhi Rajan.

Stephen it's sad to say but you are beyond help. Yoga is some people addiction yours is losing money in RGM.

Stephen, I'll also help you out with this part of the RNS. They are talked about MET Coal:

"the failure of the joint venture to agree and borrow the level of originally expected debt led to the project running short of funds and being unable to continue production. As a result, the entire value of the Company's investment has been written of"
................

Without mentioning your name you do realise they are blaming you for you blocking some resolutions at the last AGM? Bell and Kaintz never took responsibility for their disastrous investment in MET COAL and instead shifted their disastrous investment failure onto you.

I'm always baffled why you are so loyal to Kaintz. All this forthcoming massive dilution is because of the rubbish investments by Bell and Kaintz. Yet you don't blame Scott. Utterly bizarre.

Stephen I told you they were lying about the radar ground penetrating work.

From RNS:

"Following the year end, the joint venture has been active, performing line-cutting activities in anticipation of a ground penetrating radar programme, which is expected to finish in early 2020 "
...,........

I guess the vague early 2020 could mean upto 30th June 2020. That date would still be considered early 2020.