Member Info for zumore

Bambos you said:

"Very sensible investment at this time. Plain and simple"
....
I must point this out but you are always over optimistic about RGM. Looking back at your posts and taking the share consolidations into consideration, you was tipping RGM when it was 10 times higher in price, 50 times higher, 100 times higher, 500 times higher.

Why should I or others follow your advice on RGM when you always get it wrong?

Okay thank you Bambos for informing me that I'm now on a 24 hour ban.

Both players have $10,000.

Player one takes his entire $10,000 to play it in a cash game.

Player two uses strict bankroll management were he is only willing to risk 1/50th of his entire bankroll in any one cash game. So he buys in for $200 at a smaller limit cash game.

Poker experts would say that player one is much likely to go bust (probably that night). Conversely they would say that player 2 more conservative bankroll management is more likely to succeed.
.....
I guess investing in shares that would be the equivalent of a person sticking their entire $10,000 in one company; the second person would be investing smaller amounts in lots of companies.

I'm sure investment experts would say that the person who invested $10,000 in one company is much more likely to go bust.

Mr Magic, to your 21.42 post.

What is considered a tiny investment to others may be considered a big investment for that person investing. So we can't judge whether a person is confident by the size of their investment. I mean somebody may start investing in shares with £500, so we can't say to that Investor if you don't hold over 3% in the company that you've invested in then you are lacking confidence in your investment. Of course that would be silly.

Mr Magic, I see RRR like a 3 legged horse with a useless fat jockey Andrew on top. So if someone went into a bookies and bet £424 on it I would think that was a reckless big bet.

Back to my earlier post. You see many say they lose big in their first year on AIM and once they are more knowing about AIM they start to slowly claw back their first year losses. So these days to newbies I would say keep it small until you learn.

Mr Magic, in regards to the £424 investment. I recall a couple of years ago somebody posted on one of these threads saying they were new to investing. They said they were beginning with £500 and they had invested £50 in 10 different companies.

Knowing what I learnt about the perils of AIM I thought that was a sensible strategy to begin investing on AIM. Too many of us foolishly began investing on AIM with big amounts and then our investments severely dwindle and then we regret we didn't begin investing on AIM with smaller amounts so we could learn the harsher realities of AIM with not too much risk.

So no criticism from me on the £424. As we know we've seen the occasional person investing around a million in RRR and I recall they said they ended up with a tenth of that original investment.

So to sum up, nothing wrong with beginning with smaller amounts on AIM.

is fully behind these reopenings. On twitter he says:

"I welcome
@TaylorWimpey
intention to reopen the majority of their sites next month
- following careful consideration of how to respect social distancing rules on site.

Work in construction can and should continue, so long as it safe to do so"

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobertJenrick/status/1253244020232466434

"And also the news that Vistry will reopen their sites.

I hope to see further housebuilders choose to reopen shortly - once they’ve also worked through how to meet social distancing and protect their workforce"

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobertJenrick/status/1253253951291564032

One of the many problems with Kaintz is that in interviews he says RGM have a "new team" but he is the only member of the team who is associated with all the bad past at RGM. And bizarrely this guy Kaintz associated with all of RGMs dreadful past is RGMs face doing all the interviews. That's insane.

I personally wasn't familiar with JP until he came here but many say he is a smooth talking lying c*nman who is great at exaggerating and tricking PIs into parting with their money. So that begs the question, why the hell isn't he doing the interviews then?

Let's be honest little chance of great price movement with Kaintz doing the interviews. With his dreadful RGM past he should have been sacked long ago.

Yes that Scott Kaintz interview with D*c Holiday was a very peculiar interview by Scott.

I won't listen again but I recall Scott saying that the Mambare nickel exploration asset that RGM have a stake in was inferior to the WoWo Gap nickel exploration asset that RGM don't have a stake in. So in effect he was deramping Mambare.

From 20 minute mark in interview Scott revealed very little money to be made from Peaker Plants. Plus he revealed very little commitment to the project because he said they might try instead to flip it for a profit.

He pretty much said nothing will be happening in Canadian Vanadium exploration project. Nothing surprising there because RGM have never done anything there ever anyway.

From James Parson's viewpoint I can understand why he's letting Kaintz do all the interviews and promotions because let's be honest RGM is a disaster. James has done two big RGM placings these past few months and must be raking in the money. So if this is heading for disaster why not sit in the background like James and let useless Scott be the face of the company and take the blame?

I recall at the end of the interview D*c Holiday tell Kaintz he should be a politician. By that I assume he meant whenever he asked Kaintz a question Kaintz would witter on and on, trying to run the clock down so D*c couldn't get all his questions in. So to me he wasn't giving Kaintz a compliment.

FROM INTERVIEW

(1). Kaintz revealed there is very little money to be made from Peaker Plants. Kaintz said if successful the money may cover some of the companies overhead costs.

(2). I recall it was Jan 2019 RGM bought into a Canadian Vanadium exploration asset. They have never done anything there. It's near the Dempster Highway, there the temperatures are usually minus 30 Celsius. Today around minus 3 Celsius. So warming up a little but I doubt any exploration will happen there this year.

(3) RGM have a stake in Mambare nickel exploration asset. Hardly any Investor is interested in it. So what do RGM do. Yes they try to make out they've got a stake in another nickel asset. RGM at present don't own a single share in the Aussie company RMI who own the WoWo gap nickel exploration asset. But in RGMs recent presentation they have diagrams along with grades of the WoWo gap asset. RMI managing director little Warwick Davies must be absolutely livid with RGM.

In interview full of bluster from Scott Kaintz. But from interview I wasn't convinced D*c Holiday was believing. Like me he seemed totally unimpressed.

will be doing an interview next week. He's been useless for years How is he still employed at RGM?

https://mobile.twitter.com/Regency_Mines/status/1248270299075928065

Just like Partridge said. RGM are misleadingly trying to make you believe they have gained another nickel asset:

https://mobile.twitter.com/Regency_Mines/status/1247488806586060800

Hi CDF. Most would agree that RRR was a poor investment decision. It certainly was for me.

I recall investing in RRR in 2013 and I calculate if I had held all that time (I didn't ) my investment would now be 150 times smaller.

These days i have no confidence in the ability of RRR chairman Andrew Bell. Yes he makes good money at RRR but he never delivers and this share price always gets smaller. So I don't think RRR is a good investment.
......
Lots of the top FTSE companies have plummeted in price over these past few months and most would think in the long run many of their shares prices would rebound. So I would look at them for a more safer investment.

Should be Sinom. Not Sunom.

Good point Partridge.

In RNS RGM are giving the WoWo gap grades and they are obviously trying to give the false impression that they have acquired a new nickel exploration asset. Also on twitter some rampers are doing exactly the same.

To simplify. Australian company RMI owed Hong Kong company Sunom a lot of money. Sunom sold some of that debt to RGM and now Aussie company RMI owe RGM that money.

Though I'm sure RGM are going to try to pressurise RMI to ultimately get that asset. I'm also sure RMI will see RGM purchasing the Sumon debt as an agressive move. So I suspect their will quickly be bad blood between both companies.

To end. RMI presently own the WoWo gap nickel asset and not RGM.

I've always deemed him to be a conman who should be stuck in prison. Over the years continually trying to sucker PIs into his garbage investments by telling them absolute b***sh**.

I'm pleased it's not you. He's a conman sc*****.

Cgull, on Bambos twitter account he's been posting links that RGM will be releasing a presentation next week:. https://mobile.twitter.com/SHARES_FTSE_AIM/status/1248222044204011520

RMI have released an RNS and at the end of the RNS it says:

"RMI notes that Regency’s announcement refers to its “…plan to initiate constructive discussions with
RMI management regarding synergies between its Mambare project and the WoWo Gap nickel-cobalt
project in PNG”. At this stage, Regency have not made any contact with RMI, and no such discussions
have commenced"

Your sincerely

Warwick Davies
.....

Partridge, many who invested in RGM also invested in RRR. RRR chairman/CEO Andrew Bell was running RGM for around 15 years, milking it for everything it's worth. Useless inexplicable deal after the next.

Like earlier mentioned RRR and RGM still share the same office. RGMs Scott Kaintz also works at RRR and so Andrew Bell still hovers around RGM.

So the RRR shares were probably sold on the quiet anyway. If not then I doubt anybody would feel sorry about RRR being locked in because most loathe the useless dodgy Andrew Bell.

Yes they did a 100-1 share consolidation in December 2019. So with that consolidation the RGM price went to around 3p. Big fall since. Before that they also did a 20-1 share consolidation a few years ago.

When the placing hits there will be around 166 million RGM shares in issue. But if we reverse both the 100-1 and 20-1 share consolidations RGM would soon have had just over 330 billion shares in issue.

So management are notorious huge diluters. So it's pretty reckless to invest in RGM.

You can see the desperateness coming out of Helpful's posts.

He's desperately trying to prop this price up. Obviously took part in the placing.