Member Info for zumore

Because with that last post you've just to number 7 on todays top rampers list: http://www.pumpedordumped.com/rampchecker/rampcheck.php

I think with Andrew Bell still being in charge at RGM then very few AIM pi's will care about a coal mine. Just like very few care at RRR when Andrew Bell occasionally announces they've come into money. So it's not unfair to conclude that a similar indifference pi's reaction could happen here in a few months time if RGM chairman Andrew Bell announces they've made some money from the coal JV. An insight into my mind when i occasionally read these incoming money announcements is "who gives a &&&& if Andrew Bell's just come into money!"

Fridays lack of share price reaction proved that very few pi's care. So why do i think a lack of interest?

Andrew Bell's been at Regency mines for almost 14 years and in that time an huge number of AIM investors will feel they have been totally &&&&&& over by investing in an Andrew Bell company. So the bridge gets burnt and those PI's will never ever return over that bridge to invest in an Andrew Bell company. Which could be an huge problem if many thousands of them still invest on AIM.

So the huge problem for those big shareholders who highly regard Andrew Bell and have therefore invested huge amounts in RGM, is they may patiently wait for an huge number of new RGM shareholders to come along and so they can eventually offload........but it may never happen........so they get stuck here.....indefinitely.

My personal opinion, out with the old in with the new, it's the only way to appeal to everybody again.

The thing is Colin, like most others on these forums i prefer to keep my anonymity by using the made up username of "Zumore". So his disgusting post was made towards the made up username of Zumore and not towards me personally.

But Bell's disgusting post does highlight to posters to NEVER USE your real name on a public forum. Can you imagine the catastrophic consequences if he had done that lying disgusting post towards a person using their real name? It's the worst possible thing you could call a person and it could totally destroy a life.

So stick to a username: lots of lying sick puppies out there.

Yes MrMagic, i've just replied to your post and you did the perfect (title) copy because i can only see your post. :) I guess the big problem is that a poster could reply to your new but identical thread post and that post gets reported and then all the posts also get removed from your thread. So it does seem a bit silly if that is still the lse rule.

Here's a reminder of a post AB did on the sh*repr*ph8ts site a few years ago:

"Brilliant analysis throughout.
You’ve called this one right from early on based on the simplest fundamental analysis and common sense – as did Paul Scott at Stockopedia – till he was shut up by the QPP ‘activist shareholders’. He told me about this.
When a company or its ‘true believers/useful idiots’ resort to trying to terrorise dissenting voices, you know that something is badly, badly wrong. The best response to nay-sayers is proof of performance; the best answer to shorts is solid progress"

with AB. Nick Tweets: https://mobile.twitter.com/autonick5289/status/1025770939898720256 :) :)

I guess Nick is another potential RGM shareholder that AB lost.

Sorry bad link. Try this:

https://mobile.twitter.com/DrEstellePrnq/status/1025828078122135552?p=v

Here's a good example this evening why AB shouldn't do twitter. His previous armcmb twitter account got closed down and a couple weeks ago he unlocked his (business only) AndrewRRR twitter account and slowly but surely he's tweeting about non business topics.

So tonight i look at his business twitter and he's tweeting to this Dr about no business matters and quite frankly annoying her. So that's another potential RGM shareholder lost. By the way isn't she a clever doctor at how quickly she worked out AB?

https://mobile.twitter.com/DrEstellePrnq/status/1025824305995821056?p=v

Booboo, i wouldn't be surprised if Spurs (or Faz) sold because he did say he bought at 0.50p and he could've sold yesterday morning (first thing) at around 0.65p (so 30% profit). So let's hope he wisely locked in that nice profit. And lol on Mambare, i guess he's just trying to build a reputation that he's a good ramper. Who knows though maybe in a year or two we'll see a company share price rocketing and it'll be because KING ramper Spurs (or Faz) gave his new share tip and thousands of his eager followers quickly bought in. We'll see. :)

And yes Luke is strangely loyal to RGM. He freely admits his RGM investment is over £100,000 down but he keeps topping up. That's bizarre,

on share talk: "apparently PI's have the "attention span of a goldfish".
........
I actually believe the opposite is true because most PI's have elephant long term memories and so they won't invest in a company or a CEO because they remember the past. On the other hand often CEOs will have the goldfish memory because they quickly forget the share price devastation that their management decisions have caused to the share price.

Luckily you had a twitter m*r*n (aka spurs) who found it hilarious. So he copied it: https://twitter.com/hacksupreme/status/1025153711847473152

My post that caused his disgusting response? Because i suggested to him with being at the helm at RGM, there is no greater offputter to investors. I believe that is true and here's why:

I've been both long and strong(ish) in both RRR and RGM over the years and i use to cringe at how he use to conduct himself on his now closed armcmb twitter account. I remember him causing outrage from twitter users when he did unsympathetic tweets about that immigrant child years ago that got washed up on the beach. The same again when he was tweeting that a newly erected Gandhi statue (i believe in London) should be smashed down. Even years ago he was doing tweets supporting Max Clifford when he was on trial, i recall him tweeting that these stories shouldn't be heard in court instead they should instead be for his memoirs. Also seen him tweeting controversial views on gay people + also tweeting that fat women air hostesses should be on less pay than the slimmer air hostesses. He's also tweeted supportive Tommy Robinson tweets, he supports Donald Trump, he's a Brexit supporter, and he doesn't believe in Global warming.

I am personally a selfish shareholder who wants a boss of a company to appeal to the widest possible investor base. So that means i want an AIM boss to talk only about company matters and to keep his gob shut on the views of the world. I know many will disagree with me and say he should be allowed to express his views of the world but i believe many of his views have put certain investors off.

Of course the greatest reason this chairman has limited appeal is because RGM first listed at 2p and reversing the 2015 20-1 share consolidation this share price would now be 0.03p, so just under 70 times smaller share price than when it first listed. Yes some will have made money investing in RGM but many will have not and so will no longer invest in an Andrew Bell company.

New AIM company bosses have wide investor appeal but the consequence of Bell being in charge at RGM for almost 14 years is that he's p**sed many investors off over the years and so the AIM pool of investors for him gets smaller and smaller. I guess that is the consequence of having long termers like AB still in charge. You often need fresh blood in charge and then you start to appeal to everybody again.

On numerous browsers (on both laptop and mobile phone) i can't hear any of your podcasts. On the other hand the Doc Holiday dlc through the soundcloud platform (i'm not using a soundcloud app) can be heard on everything.

"And that garden shed comment. Wow."
.....................
Yes it was a sick disgusting post by him but on the other hand it was somewhat amusing seeing fellow posters heaping praise on him (that taught Zumore!) and egging him on. Of course AB bright but dim lapped it up and then thickly continued posting. So not only did he pee off shareholders last night by releasing an after hours rns (lol that was a clever move) but he was also acting like a d*** on here last night. Lol what more could you ask for from a chairman when you are hoping for a big price rise the next day?

"That was absolute classic from Mr Bell absolutely ripped that Z shorter brilliant it was hhahaha"
..........
I would have imagined you were in the minority who thought that repulsive post last evening was amusing. I'm sure most RGM shareholders was shocked that the RGM CEO was posting disgusting posts on a public forum.

So his disgusting posting last night in my opinion definitely didn't help RGM shareholders today.

"Has (not) spoken. It obviously needs to read this board. And I doubt even ChooChoo would suggest that Zumore watches kiddy films. Some people need to calm down. It is Rosa 2."
........
Hi Cgull, it was a disgusting post that got quickly removed.

And as we know Mr B is an Elon Musk wannabe because you'll remember the other month RGM invested in a Tesla car hire company? You may also recall the other week when a Thailand cave rescuer laughed at Elon Musk's submarine idea to rescue those Thai children? Mr Musk didn't like getting laughed at and he then went into an massive hissy fit on his twitter account and resorted to similar disgusting name calling like Bell did to me last night.

He was bullish last night and i pointed out to him that maybe no great price rise because he's in charge. He couldn't take it and then he resorted to disgusting insults.

"For the year ended 31 December 2017, Omega sold 749,000 tons of coal, generating revenues of $34m. Omega employs approximately 70 employees"
..................................
$45 a ton is a pretty awful average coal price when you consider that met coal was hitting $300 a ton during 2017. So highly likely that the $34 million revenue was loss making considering revenue only takes into account the coal sales. So it doesn't take into account all the other various costs.

Here's investopedia talking simply about REVENUE: https://www.investopedia.com/video/play/what-revenue/
........
Just seen your post Stephen. Yes rats clackers quite hilarious (sorry i didn't know you would take that post to heart). And knowing how you ramp these past two years, i bet the first thing you did was to work out the average sales price of those 749,000 tons and you were hoping for an average of $150 a ton?: lol it came to average of $45 a ton. And you'll know those off take agreements will not be easy to renegotiate. So how do LH/RGM possibly make a profit?

I briefly had you on filter but i took you off a few minutes ago when i saw your over the top swearing celebrations on RGM hashtag.

That $2 million + $1 million is the combined amount RGM/LH contributed. Tonights RNS doesn't say how much of that money was paid to Omaha holdings. So tonights RNS was very vague and PIs should be updated of how much of that $3 million was spent.

Please link me to those Omaha holdings reports of profits because i don't believe you.

No mentions of how much money it cost RGM/LH to take over Omega holdings?

The Legacy hill website says "Legacy Hill Resources is a private mining company majority owned by its employees. We have a track record in turning around troubled assets that suffer from either poor operational or financial management decisions"
.......................................

So i suppose we can assume (because of what LH specialise in taking over bombed out companies) that Omega holdings was loss making? You would've thought RGM would've told shareholders of this?
...................

Lastly on the Mining equity trust website they say "Omega sold 749,000 tons of coal, generating revenues of $34m. Omega employs approximately 70 employees with strong mining experience, competencies and customer insights".

So if REVENUES only = COAL SALES (and nothing else. so doesn't take into account other various company costs), then 749,000 of SOLD TONS x $45 (for each ton of coal) would according to my calculator, comes to around $34 million in revenue.

So if Omaha holdings only received $45 for each sold ton, then all of the other costs had to be taken out of that $45, then imo pretty a big chance Omaha holdings weren't making a profit. So with no doubt already previous locked in off take agreements how do RGM/LH possibly now make a profit? .

No need to respond anybody. Many of you are probably going out tonight to celebrate.

but RGM chairman Andrew Bell took out RGMs $1.6 million loan almost 2 months ago. So the RGM loan payment schedule is getting ever nearer and still no new coal asset news from RGM.

Albeit a much bigger loan i see Amur minerals took a loan with the same lenders as RGM (for $1.6 million loan). http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=AMC&ArticleCode=ue0p0uic&ArticleHeadline=Up_To_US10_Million_Loan_Facility

From glancing at Amur it seems if RGM move to a payment schedule after 6 months then it would then the lenders would convert every month.