Member Info for zooropa

I love a company where the share price is depressed along with frustrated comments from PI's, the CEO says he will avoid dilutive financing at all costs, multiple good quality assets delivering and on the verge of delivering revenue. The share price has been sitting around this level for several months now. I think there is accumulation going on in anticipation of news on several fronts. Been keeping quiet and accumulating for a while now to point where VAST is now my largest holding. It's going to be an interesting year.

993444's views are so balanced he reaches for the Filter button if you disagree with him. I think the word you were looking for is biased, not balanced 😄 Seems I'm not the only one who doesn't get the business case here

Ha ha you read it

and it's zooropa

I bow to your considerable experience (member for 5 week) - dusterhaters Roooooaaar posts are more in line with your level of comprehension and level of debate

Suit yourself

I'm not a troll / deramper looking to wind folks up or get a lower entry (people who have been on LSE for years know that). My posts will be lost by tomorrow. GB seems like an interesting product (although just a copycat idea with, I'm sure, a different, possibly better implementation than competitors) and the share price seems not unreasonable (think 1p would be fair value) . Lots of big news flow to come during 2018 which could rocket the sp. The only thing that worries me is the lack of interest thus far. If that is repeated for forthcoming news, could see this sub 1p.

DJWall, I just don't know who will take up GB. Not the ordinary man in the street that's for sure. Only those on this board and in fintech circles will have heard of or are even likely to hear of Goldbloc and Lionsgold (a small bit actor on Eastenders has infinitely more visibility than Lionsgold)

I've just watched the Stocktube interview from 3 months ago. Very weak interview. CP says twice about GB being a product that the public will want. I don't want it. I don't see why I would want it. Seem to remember a figure of 20,000 user uptake target by end of 2018. That seems laughably unambitious. I do see an opportunity to make money from an increase in share price but mainly based on hype, not on earth shattering demand for GB. Maybe I just don't get it but CP hasn't explained WHY someone like me would want to own GB in a way that convinces me. Is the idea that my money would be more secure (in terms of its value) being backed by physical gold? What is my money in my RBS accounts backed by? If the price of gold rose 5x does that mean that I'd be able to buy 5x more mars bars with my money? Maybe both of those points are the answer. This isn't a deramp. I'm trying to understand why I might want or need or would even consider storing all my wealth in gold bloc. Be interested to hear everyone's views (I've probably just shown myself up with my ignorance)

Think it's qpr. He'll either do fantastically well or lose it all on here. Expect garnets and placings long before any worthwhile diamond find. At least the prof can throw the green diamond into all future RNS's instead of just garnets. This company has delivered zilch since it started.

There were over 1,000 posts a day for many days before the Newmont announcement. Now struggling to reach 5. Only news will reverse this.

Your ramping is reaching new heights : )

You two are funny : )

Could you draw a line under the squabbling please (and ramping on various boards isn't helpful - you know who you are). It's ok to be positive but all this 10p by month's end nonsense doesn't do your credibility much good.

Hi Mibo, I'm thinking of investing here and wondered if you are currently invested or were looking to invest when you feel the share price reaches what you feel is fair value?

Simon Buckingham is flogging a dead horse with MOS. At least he managed to buy himself a nice house from PI's money but time to call time on this dog Simon. Life is short and you're just wasting your life and PI's money now. Game over.

It's because this sites developer is incompetent and the founder has a lazy attitude towards site quality. It's been going on for years. It's a chat site run by incompetents

Valhalla, don't copy to any other board as don't want to spam but do report me please and please like my post if y'all agree

ADMIN, PLEASE READ ALL OF THIS MESSAGE. Valhalla, the team at LSE are incompetent. The slow performance for hours on end every other day, missing risers fallers data, loss of css file formatting etc has been going on for many years now. Any complaint is met with a sorry but never any long term solution. Whoever is in charge of LSE really needs to let someone competent take over. It's a great site run by an amateur. Could you do me a favour and report me but copy and paste to few other boards as a means of protest. Could other users please repost too as this incompetence has gone on long enough. Most long term posters on here know who I am and that I'm no trouble maker. If I'm removed by Admin it'll tell you what they think of their members. If, on the other hand, they issue an apology and plan for resolution on the front page header then that would be the correct and decent thing to do.

Wow! More Garnets : ) What a surprise. Placing ahoy?