The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
Edark
Because the company hasn't replied to you, you have decided to post multiple times a day on this forum, hoping the company notices and replies to you. Quite childish.
"Doesn't even matter if my questions can't be answered at the time..."
Ah so the answers to your questions aren't that important to you. It's more you want the company to acknowledge you and say hello.
I can't be bothered with this. Onto filter list.
Edark
I've communicated with the board in the past and they've been helpful.
Now is not the time to be answering individual investors question.
Far more important things for the board to deal with currently. Things have been moving quickly.
As far as the IR firm is concerned, they can't give you any information that hasn't already been released by the company. Neither can the board. They've released what information they have chosen to for the time being. So I don't understand what you think you will gain from speaking to Paul?
Since you won't be getting a reply from the company, does that mean you won't invest and move on? It appears to be a significant weighting factor for you.
Or are you indecisive and prefer to stick around and moan?
"I have been advised not to comment further regarding the litigation"
Problem is you've already threatened him in public. That's not how you go about libel proceedings and his barrister can counter sue you.
As far as you lawyer obtaining jonnys identification,
LSE has his email, granted he used his genuine email address. They have no right to disclose that. There's nothing stopping jonny changing his linked email to a bogus one. Any other way to obtain his Identification will be challenged in court. You will need to disclose how that information was legally obtained.
For libel a barrister is required not a lawyer, it's a high court matter. I can recommend my one, she's based in Mayfair and served me and my colleagues well.
Better yet, save your money and move on. I don't know what Jonny said but nobody cares and the board has moved on.
Grh you still havent answered my question from when you started this attack on me.
You said I posted uninformed nonsense and the drilling team was in such high demand they couldn't wait a week.
What information do you have to back that up?
If you're going to call someone clueless then back it up.
I then said we were BOTH wrong in relation to funding in the past. That has clearly rattled you to go so far back into my posting history.
No one is right all the time, no one should expect to be either.
Grh I havent got the time to scroll through your 2k plus posts.
Androceles read it wrong so I didn't feel the need to correct him as it was clear.
I didn't say you said placing won't ever be required.
We were both wrong on how funding was going to be raised after we hit mudblock at mou2. You can go through your own posts at the time.
"so I will merely say that I was shocked by your personal position on several matters
not least of which:
regarding Mr Putin
regarding Ukraine
regarding the role of NATO
regarding the longevity of CEG"
Lol grow up.
So there's no confusion matt, I have nowhere near 8-10m shares. I wish. I own 1mil.
I think Tuesdays news alone could take us much higher, it was that good. A week or 2 later mou4 funding/spud date to add some fuel to the fire.
Same price 10.5p. They have thier discount and then news to make the sp run up. Other companies have pulled it off before when releasing good news.
Were digressing my point was to wait a week and raise at 20p. 9mil dilution vs 18mil.
My last comment on the matter.
Enjoy what we have here.
Matt my point is it was 24hours later and so paul was aware it was in the works. Thats not an ideal scenario mentioning it upcoming, better would be to release both rns the same time. That's granted there was an urgent reason it had to be so quick.
If he did the raise a week later then of course no need to mention it and let the sp run. My preffered method. Nothing stopping star valley moving to mou4 in the meantime.
Like I said yesterday, I've been diluted down from 1% to 0.22%. So it's my one irritation with prd.
To add,
As paul and lonny fell off thier chairs and knew they had to raise asap then they should've released the raise rns alongside mou3 update or mentioned they are in the process of securing funds.
Not let new buyers come in and then drop -15% the following day.
The results are great so the sp would obviously recover but regardless, I don't condone this type of behaviour. I also expect directors to do everything possible to reduce dilution. This doesn't mean don't raise and have nothing, it means time them.
Grh you've been wrong in regards to funding before and we've had a placing instead. I was wrong alongside you.
Paul has made haste regrettable decisions before. The cng interview comes to mind.
Anyways I don't want to detract from what is an exciting time for the company. I'm happy to be wrong, if it turns out there was an urgent reason we had to pay star valley right away and not next week.
(BTW...Forget about the total cobblers posted by Zebra re these drill guys and lady not being in high demand...
just uninformed nonsense...
The rig has been at guerciff since January when mou2 was suspended. Over 5 months incurring negligible costs.
Care to share what information you have that proves we couldn't wait a week before securing star valleys service for mou4. Or is it just a dream?
From the results of mou1/2/3 they know they have a long term partner in us.
@keith Of course the latter. However my point was we could've got to the there with less dilution.
@Grh I look forward to hearing more.
@livininhope. I've supported this company a long time from 3.5p. Seen this board grow from sometimes zero posts a day.
@PT I don't think it's fair to call me a detractor. Those that have been here long enough will know I don't agree with timings of raises.