RE: Price Drop5 May 2020 01:39
Daramuda - regarding your recent posts.....
I can assure you I am very familiar with the Oxus case but even so, I followed your advice and Googled "Oxus Gold" to be sure that I wasn't missing anything blindingly obvious. It came as no great surprise that I struggled to find anything to suggest that Richard Wilkins, or indeed any of the other directors should be held responsible for the loss of Oxus's assets in Uzbekistan. Nor have I seen anything in the administrators' comprehensive reports of anything even remotely negative towards any of them.
If you believe otherwise, can I respectfully suggest that you provide evidence to substantiate your implied suggestion of blame rather than posting vague comments that appear to be designed to discredit him. Rather than suggesting that people 'Google it' which seems a bit lame, please explain exactly why blame should be directed at him or anyone else connected with Oxus, with specific examples of culpability please.
On your implied suggestion that Tom Winnifrith may have negative intentions towards Phoenix, do you have any evidence whatsoever that he has Phoenix in his sights or are you simply trying to plant the idea in people's minds?
Trying to use an article by Winnifrith on Martin Hughes, which by your own admission you have not even read, as some sort of link between Winnifrith and Phoenix comes across as a bit tenuous to say the least but if you can provide evidence of any negative intent by Winnifrith specifically towards Phoenix I'm more than happy to stand corrected. If you have no such evidence, why bother mentioning Winnifrith in the same breath as Phoenix? Unless of course your intention is to try to undermine Phoenix.
On the subject of the loan notes, there are any number of scenarios that would result in the loan notes being repaid on time, or indeed ahead of the time. Failing that, they do not absolutely have to be repaid on the date of maturity, and given that they are in 'friendly' hands, the likelihood is that the date would either be extended or some other form of settlement would be reached by mutual consent. It happens all the time as I'm sure you're aware so I really don't think that the board, the loan note holders or shareholders will be losing any sleep over it. I certainly won't be.
I'm all for contrarian views to ensure a healthy discussion board and I'm also all for directors being challenged but some of the stuff (but not all) that you've posted recently just comes across as nothing more than an unnecessary desperate attempt to undermine the company and certain directors.
Please go back and re-read your posts, both here and on ADVFN and try to view them through the eyes of an existing shareholder rather than as a disgruntled ex-shareholder (assuming you've completely sold out) and you might understand what I mean.