Member Info for yasx

Noted. It does not bother me what TradeNonsense thinks or says - but, it does bother him that I tell it as it is as regards ANR. You see, I am firmly of the view that he is looking for an exit, hence his garbled nonsense on the MRS thread a while ago about a merger between MRS and ANR which had nil substance.It was that issue that directed me here and caused me to appraise this stock I will draw a line under matters with you. On balance, I think you mean well and perhaps believe in the investment case unlike others. I will cease posting anything that agitates you inadvertently or otherwise.

It is highly hypocritical of you to suggest you are disenchanted re comments which you (unjustifiably) feel are personal in nature, that seemingly cause you to suggest that commentary be engineered in a different tone. Funny that when the ghastly TradeNonsense made highly inflammatory and aggressive remarks in my direction none of you so called ethical contributors flinched. I will take a lecture on ethics from those able to spell it, not from those with a hypocritical tilt. What this really boils down to is that you don't like the bear case I present re ANR, and this has nothing to do with anything other than that. What we have here is a bunch of failed rampers who are not enjoying the fact that the market is not reacting to their twaddle. As for Hogan and my alleged disenchantment - give me strength. I have no interest in him or his views since I consider him entirely insignificant. I am long MRS in which I know from official publications he has a holding. I have only (to my knowledge) ever commented on this stock in which he has a holding because egregious nuts (like TradeNonsense) went on to make a fictitious association between MRS and ANR, which MRS quite rightly (no doubt to TradeNonsense's chagrin) repudiated and have no idea what other stocks he holds, and would certainly not follow his lead into anything. I undertake my own research and have forgotten more than he (and some of the bulls on here) ever knew. As for ANR, I continue to maintain it is overvalued on known metrics in my view. It takes two opinions to make a market. Hope that helps.

13:31 He has just attacked my investment and mocked me.I want pay back, 18:37 As for threats, of course it is very uncool to threaten somebody on a forum, pointless really. Errr, make your mind up. Chuckle chuckle.

I note BF/Investorworld/TradeNonsense all use the same words incorrectly. Coincidental? Chuckle chuckle.

I think one can readily speculate as to what news is likely to be advanced - I suspect very bullish seismic and so on. Does it alter the bear case? Not one jot. Just a jam tomorrow type of announcement says this gracious chap.

I cannot recall who it was that declared on here that having sustained a portfolio loss of 60% this year, he had decided to put the remnants in this Co at 0.75p. I mean, far be it from me to suggest what anyone ought to do, but that was clearly another failed initiative. So, after being down 60% for the year, that chap (I think it was that Fadden or Guzzler but I pay little attention to their contributions so cannot recall) is nursing an even bigger loss. Chuckle chuckle.

Or shall we cal you Tradenonsense? You ought to be more subtle, but your poor command of language keeps reappearing in the same form. Chuckle chuckle. As for Mr Khan, whoever that might be I know not, well, keep living in the land of fiction. I see from your posting history that you are involved in this and MAC. I wonder who else is... Chuckle chuckle. Anyone wish to buy some data?

I do not think you should concern yourself with the definition of a tweet. But, you perhaps might be concerned that other than you and a few deluded bulls on here, there is no interest in this alleged colossal coal asset. Price sinking again...

Well, that leaves us in no doubt as to why this is vastly overvalued. Surprised it has not cratered this morning - do people not read the results? Or do they just look at silly tweets? Oh well.

Well, I am not privy to anything but I suspect fairly soon we will see this report land and the twitter crowd (as well as those on here) already in will seek to promote on the basis of the same. Needless to point out, I expect the report to talk about the potential and the outstanding seismic and so on - none if it will amount to much if anything at all in m y view.. I expect any transient spike to be sold into.

I see reality starting to set in here - down considerably since I first appeared on here indicating why I did not think any of this twaddle relating to the securing of considerable funds for this alleged gargantuan asset had much merit at all. Nor do I think any of this coal will ever be produced. Problem for TradeNonsense is how does he exit his position (incidentally, we can all see how several others using precisely the same command of language as TradeNonsense are permeating the same message on here - of course it is not him Chuckle chuckle.). Talk about desperation...

Well, sentiment appears punctured, and down it goes again - I did explain at 0.75p why this was fundamentally detached from any underlying value, but, instead bulls sought to lambast this gracious chap. be that as it may, I see no buyers stepping up here. How TradeNonsense (the purveyor of untruths) will exit his position remains to be seen (and others on here who also din't really believe the hype but pretend so to do) - but, I expect a lot of Wow! Amazing! Pow! type of comments and tweets when the seismic analysis and report arrives (likely before the end of the year). Of course, some of us just ignore the noise and know what the asset is worth (one clue is what the Co. was able to fetch for it when they went out with the finance bowl several weeks ago and found few takers - read the RNS from October).

I am sufficiently bored engaging the hardened bulls on here - I will be back when the company announces the next piece of news. Until then I will leave the uncouth and mendacious to it...

Given the abhorrent and malicious profanities hurled in my direction, I am perplexed why you consider anything I have said to be even remotely unpalatable. Whether I expect you to win or lose is immaterial - what will determine the outcome of your investment is willing buyers and sellers. I expect there will not be many buyers soaking up the thesis that there is an asset that no major entity decided to back with hard money when the Company was tapping potential funders for cash save for the two parties who took up a stake for 210k. If I am proven to be wrong, then so be it, but I very much doubt it and the desperation from Tradesense reinforces my view. The idea of these forums is not to engage in suppressing comment or hurling insults, but to discuss companies and the basis for investing or disinvesting in them. One sees a pertinacious and unyielding approach among bulls of preventing counter opinion on overhyped tiddlers which inevitably serves only one purpose (being to maintain the hype). Ungentlemanly conduct is the hallmark of the uncouth and although I resist the temptation to indulge in the same.

You really are a ghastly nut. It is fairly clear what you are up to. But, you might wish to prop this up to offload your position, however, that does not mean that I will assist you in propagating your garbage to flip to mug punters. Off you go you...chuckle chuckle. Incidentally, I did hear a rumour that one chap who is now a hardened bull was actively trying to talk this down prior to the placing using various pseudonyms on here and twitter - wonder what that might be Tradesense? Wink wink - chuckle chuckle.

I am not concerned about your investment - that is a matter for you. But, if I were you, I would be concerned. I appeared on here when the price was 0.75p - thus far, it is going as I indicated it would. I expect that to continue. Time will tell. I expect the next attempt to spike this will be when the report is released prior to year end - look for a lot of glowing jam tomorrow material in that. Words like 'potential' and so on...

Re the CEO interview - I have already listened to it and commented upon it in my post on Weds 23.08 Nothing in that which would lead me to alter my view - it merely reinforces what I think. Hope that helps.

Another few contributions from the bulls - but nothing that mentions the Co. They appear focused entirely on myself. I appreciate the fascination (they are merely deluded fans that I choose to ignore), but the purpose of this thread is to discuss ANR. My point is simple - even if this asset was a robust one (not accepted), it would require a considerable fortune to even begin to develop it. ANR has negligible funds and is seemingly unable to tap anyone for funds (apart from two investors who offer paltry sums in exchange for vast amounts of the Co). Before anyone says the Chinese are willing and ready to offer tens of millions of pounds for a stake in the asset, does it not occur to you that if the Chinese were so willing, surely they would have participated when the Co last month made it clear in the public domain that they wanted a tiny bit of cash and to obtain the same would give the backer a huge chunk of the asset. There is a reason nobody stepped up - does not take Sherlock Holmes to figure out the asset has negligible value to anyone. Now,I know that bulls on here and the CEO the other day indicated the reason they gave away so much for such a tiny amount was because of the expertise of the investors, but are these investors really better placed than the potential developers from China in terms of mining expertise? No, thought not. So what could they not see that a retail investor who has never visited a mine could see. Rhetorical question of course.

Another few contributions from the bulls - but nothing that mentions the Co. They appear focused entirely on myself. I appreciate the fascination (they are merely deluded fans that I choose to ignore), but the purpose of this thread is to discuss ANR. My point is simple - even if this asset was a robust one (not accepted), it would require a considerable fortune to even begin t develop. ANR has n funds and is unable to tap anyone for funds (apart from two investors who offer paltry suns in exchange for vast amounts of the Co). Before anyone says the Chinese are willing and ready to offer tens of millions of punds for a stake, does it not occur to you that if the Chinese were so willing, surely they would have participated when the Co last month made it clear in the public domain that they wanted a tiny bit of cash and to obtain the same would give the backer a huge chunk of the asset. There is a reason nobody stepped up - does not take Sherlock Holmes to figure out the asset has negligible value to anyone. Now,I know that bulls on here and the CEO the other day indicated the reason they gave away so much for such a tiny amount was because of the expertise of the investors, but are these investors really better placed than the potential developers from China in terms of mining expertise? No, thought not. So what could they not see that a retail investor who has never visited a mine could see. Rhetorical question of course.

Below 0.1p in 2018 - screenshot that says this sagacious chap. ..